form10q.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
__________________________________

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)

þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended:  September 30, 2011

OR

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ___________

Commission file number 1-8625
 
 
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
95-3885184
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
   
500 Citadel Drive, Suite 300
Commerce,  CA
(Address of principal executive offices)
90040
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (213) 235-2240

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  þ  No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):  Large accelerated filer ¨  Accelerated filer þ  Non-accelerated filer ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨  No  þ
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  As of November 3, 2011, there were 21,411,348 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share and 1,495,490 shares of Class B Voting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share outstanding.
 


 
 

 
 
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 Page
 
 
PART I – Financial Information
Item 1 – Financial Statements
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(U.S. dollars in thousands except par value amounts)
   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
ASSETS
     
Current Assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 26,757     $ 34,568  
Receivables
    4,664       5,470  
Inventory
    805       989  
Investment in marketable securities
    2,731       2,985  
Restricted cash
    2,253       2,159  
Deferred tax asset, net
    770       --  
Prepaid and other current assets
    3,868       3,536  
Assets held for sale
    4,155       55,210  
Total current assets
    46,003       104,917  
                 
Property held for and under development
    85,791       35,702  
Property & equipment, net
    212,985       220,250  
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    10,642       10,415  
Investment in Reading International Trust I
    838       838  
Goodwill
    21,342       21,535  
Intangible assets, net
    18,329       20,156  
Deferred tax asset, net
    12,996       --  
Other assets
    9,557       16,536  
Total assets
  $ 418,483     $ 430,349  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  $ 14,559     $ 15,930  
Film rent payable
    4,390       5,757  
Notes payable – current portion
    49,114       108,124  
Taxes payable
    25,778       23,872  
Deferred current revenue
    7,637       8,727  
Other current liabilities
    135       141  
Total current liabilities
    101,613       162,551  
Notes payable – long-term portion
    120,737       83,784  
Notes payable to related party – long-term
    9,000       9,000  
Subordinated debt
    27,913       27,913  
Noncurrent tax liabilities
    2,267       2,267  
Other liabilities
    36,057       32,195  
Total liabilities
    297,587       317,710  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Class A non-voting common stock, par value $0.01, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 31,675,518 issued and 21,411,348 outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 31,500,693 issued and 21,308,823 outstanding at December 31, 2010
    218       216  
Class B voting common stock, par value $0.01, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,495,490 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010
    15       15  
Nonvoting preferred stock, par value $0.01, 12,000 shares authorized and no issued or outstanding shares at September 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010
    --       --  
Additional paid-in capital
    134,376       134,236  
Accumulated deficit
    (61,045 )     (76,035 )
Treasury shares
    (4,093 )     (3,765 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    50,550       57,120  
Total Reading International, Inc. stockholders’ equity
    120,021       111,787  
Noncontrolling interests
    875       852  
Total stockholders’ equity
    120,896       112,639  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 418,483     $ 430,349  

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Operating Revenue
                       
Cinema
  $ 61,867     $ 55,303     $ 173,577     $ 161,582  
Real estate
    4,817       5,286       14,332       14,027  
Total operating revenue
    66,684       60,589       187,909       175,609  
Operating expense
                               
Cinema
    48,643       44,811       138,352       129,973  
Real estate
    2,496       2,142       7,371       6,519  
Depreciation and amortization
    4,297       3,874       12,718       11,626  
Impairment expense
    --       --       --       2,239  
General and administrative
    4,173       4,198       13,163       13,020  
Total operating expense
    59,609       55,025       171,604       163,377  
                                 
Operating income
    7,075       5,564       16,305       12,232  
                                 
Interest income
    466       340       1,307       986  
Interest expense
    (7,746 )     (3,955 )     (17,923 )     (11,765 )
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets
    1       --       (66 )     350  
Other income (expense)
    6       20       79       (690 )
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense), equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities, and discontinued operations
    (198 )     1,969       (298 )     1,113  
Income tax benefit (expense)
    39       (885 )     13,177       (13,669 )
Income (loss) before equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities, and discontinued operations
    (159 )      1,084        12,879       (12,556 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    454       293       1,087       910  
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
    295       1,377       13,966       (11,646 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (5 )     1       35       31  
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
    --       --       1,656       --  
Net income (loss)
  $ 290     $ 1,378     $ 15,657     $ (11,615 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (253 )     (136 )     (667 )     (505 )
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 37     $ 1,242     $ 14,990     $ (12,120 )
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders – basic and diluted:
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
  $ --     $ 0.05     $ 0.58     $ (0.53 )
Earnings from discontinued operations, net
    --       --       0.07       --  
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ --     $ 0.05     $ 0.65     $ (0.53 )
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic
    22,782,534       22,804,313       22,759,488       22,772,166  
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted
    22,979,952       22,850,811       22,956,906       22,772,166  

 
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Operating Activities
           
Net income (loss)
  $ 15,657     $ (11,615 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
(Gain) loss recognized on foreign currency transactions
    14       (12 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    (1,087 )     (910 )
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    598       910  
Loss provision on impairment of asset
    --       2,239  
Gain on sale of assets
    (1,590 )     (350 )
Change in valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets
    (15,127 )     --  
Gain on sale of marketable securities
    (8 )     --  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,718       11,642  
Amortization of prior service costs
    246       228  
Amortization of above and below market leases
    302       682  
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    1,001       982  
Amortization of straight-line rent
    689       (279 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    142       44  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease in receivables
    753       3,890  
Decrease in prepaid and other assets
    142       31  
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (1,171 )     (832 )
Decrease in film rent payable
    (1,323 )     (2,500 )
Increase taxes payable
    1,911       12,813  
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues and other liabilities
    3,214       (1,482 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    17,081       15,481  
Investing activities
               
Acquisitions
    (3,917 )     (5,359 )
Purchases of and additions to property and equipment
    (4,761 )     (9,057 )
Change in restricted cash
    (119 )     (1,573 )
Purchase of notes receivable
    (2,784 )     --  
Purchase of marketable securities
    --       (62 )
Sale of marketable securities
    124       30  
Distributions of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    --       200  
Collection of note receivable
    6,750       --  
Cinema sale proceeds from noncontrolling shareholder
    1,867       --  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (2,840 )     (15,821 )
Financing activities
               
Repayment of long-term borrowings
    (124,859 )     (15,370 )
Proceeds from borrowings
    105,311       15,525  
Capitalized borrowing costs
    (774 )     (265 )
Repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock
    (328 )     (251 )
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
    --       253  
Noncontrolling interest contributions
    163       200  
Noncontrolling interest distributions
    (655 )     (1,028 )
Net cash used in financing activities
    (21,142 )     (936 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (910 )     1,388  
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (7,811 )     112  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    34,568       24,612  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 26,757     $ 24,724  
                 
Supplemental Disclosures
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest on borrowings
  $ 12,907     $ 10,712  
Income taxes
  $ 1,881     $ 594  
Non-cash transactions
               
Foreclosure of a mortgage note to obtain title of the underlying property
  $ 1,125     $ --  
Reduction in note payable associated with acquisition purchase price adjustment
  $ --     $ 4,381  
Deemed distribution
  $ --     $ 877  
Capital lease asset addition
  $ --     $ 4,697  
Capital lease obligation
  $ --     $ 5,573  
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011


Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
Reading International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RDI” and collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, the “Company,” “Reading” and “we,” “us,” or “our”), was founded in 1983 as a Delaware corporation and reincorporated in 1999 in Nevada.  Our businesses consist primarily of:
 
·  
the development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand; and
 
·  
the development, ownership, and operation of retail and commercial real estate in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting.  As such, certain information and disclosures typically required by US GAAP for complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted.  The financial information presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the “September Report”) should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report which contains the latest audited financial statements and related notes.  The periods presented in this document are the three (“2011 Quarter”) and nine (“2011 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2011 and the three (“2010 Quarter”) and nine (“2010 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2010.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of our operations, and cash flows as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 have been made.  The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year.

Marketable Securities

We had investments in marketable securities of $2.7 million and $3.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  We account for these investments as available for sale investments.  We assess our investment in marketable securities for other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320-10 for each applicable reporting period.  These investments have a cumulative unrealized gain (loss) of $5,000 and $(43,000) included in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $138,000 and $30,000, respectively.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $263,000 and $520,000, respectively.  During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we sold $21,000 and $126,000, respectively, of our marketable securities with a realized gain of $11,000 and $2,000, respectively.

Refinanced Long-Term Debt

           On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility with BOS International (“BOSI”) of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with the proceeds from a new credit facility from National Australia Bank (“NAB”) of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million).  See Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities).
 
 
Plans to Refinance Credit Facility

The term of our New Zealand Credit Facility with Westpac matures on March 31, 2012.  Accordingly, the September 30, 2011 outstanding balance of this debt of $21.5 million (NZ$28.0 million) is classified as current on our balance sheet.  We are currently in discussions with our lender as to the renewal of this facility.

Deferred Leasing Costs

We amortize direct costs incurred in connection with obtaining tenants over the respective term of the lease on a straight-line basis.

Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize direct costs incurred in connection with obtaining financing over the term of the loan using the effective interest method, or the straight-line method, if the result is not materially different.  In addition, interest on loans with increasing interest rates and scheduled principal pre-payments, is also recognized using the effective interest method.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During 2011

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06 – Fair Value Measurements

ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about the transfers of classifications among the fair value classification levels and the reasons for those changes and separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the presentation of the roll forward of Level 3 assets and liabilities.  Those disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.  The adoption of this portion of the ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU No. 2011-05 - Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income

ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, eliminating the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity.  Under either choice, items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income are required to be presented on the face of the financial statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented.  This amendment is effective for our Company in 2012 and will be applied retrospectively.  This amendment will change the manner in which the Company presents comprehensive income but will not change any of the balances or activity.

FASB ASU No. 2011-08 - Intangibles—Goodwill and Other

ASU No. 2011-08 relates to a change in the annual test of goodwill for impairment.  The statement permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350.  This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  This amendment will change the manner in which the Company performs its goodwill impairment test.

 
Note 2 – Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we issued 174,825 and 148,616, respectively, of Class A Nonvoting shares to certain executive employees associated with the vesting of their prior years’ stock grants.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we accrued $188,000 and $563,000, respectively, in compensation expense associated with the vesting of executive employee stock grants.

Employee/Director Stock Option Plan

We have a long-term incentive stock option plan that provides for the grant to eligible employees, directors, and consultants of incentive or nonstatutory options to purchase shares of our Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and Class B Voting Common Stock. Our 1999 Stock Option Plan expired in November 2009, and was replaced by our new 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the holders of our Class B Voting Common Stock in May 2010.

When the Company’s tax deduction from an option exercise exceeds the compensation cost resulting from the option, a tax benefit is created.  FASB ASC 718-20 relating to Stock-Based Compensation (“FASB ASC 718-20”), requires that excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises be reflected as financing cash inflows instead of operating cash inflows.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was no impact to the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows because there were no recognized tax benefits from stock option exercises during these periods.

FASB ASC 718-20 requires companies to estimate forfeitures.  Based on our historical experience and the relative market price to strike price of the options, we do not currently estimate any forfeitures of vested or unvested options.

In accordance with FASB ASC 718-20, we estimate the fair value of our options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which takes into account assumptions such as the dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate, the expected stock price volatility, and the expected life of the options.  We exclude the dividend yield from the calculation, as we intend to retain all earnings.  We expense the estimated grant date fair values of options issued on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

For the 157,700 options granted during 2010, we estimated the fair value of these options at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

   
2010
 
Stock option exercise price
    $5.07  
Risk-free interest rate
    2.736%  
Expected dividend yield
    --  
Expected option yield      7.23 yrs  
Expected volatility
    33.01%  
Weighted average fair value
    $1.88  

We did not grant any options during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 
Based on prior years’ assumptions, and, in accordance with the FASB ASC 718-20, we recorded compensation expense for the total estimated grant date fair value of stock options that vested of $47,000 and $142,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $23,000 and $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.  At September 30, 2011, the total unrecognized estimated compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted was $156,000, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average vesting period of 0.95 years.  90,000 options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 having a realized value of $138,000 for which we received $253,000 of cash.  There were no options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  The grant date fair value of options vesting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $47,000 and $142,000, respectively, and $23,000 and $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.  The intrinsic, unrealized value of all options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, at September 30, 2011 was $273,000 of which 91.3% are currently exercisable.

Pursuant to both our 1999 Stock Option Plan and our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, all stock options expire within ten years of their grant date.  The aggregate total number of shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and Class B Voting Common Stock authorized for issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan is 1,250,000.  At the discretion of our Compensation and Stock Options Committee, the vesting period of stock options is usually between zero and four years.

We had the following stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

   
Common Stock Options Outstanding
   
Weighted Average Exercise
Price of Options Outstanding
   
Common Stock Exercisable
Options
   
Weighted Average
Price of Exercisable
Options
 
   
Class A
   
Class B
   
Class A
   
Class B
   
Class A
   
Class B
   
Class A
   
Class B
 
Outstanding- January 1, 2010
    589,750       150,000     $ 5.51     $ 10.24       534,750       150,000     $ 5.62     $ 10.24  
Granted
    122,600       35,100     $ 4.23     $ 8.47                                  
Exercised
    (90,000 )     --     $ 2.76     $ --                                  
Outstanding- December 31, 2010
    622,350       185,100     $ 5.65     $ 9.90       449,750       150,000     $ 6.22     $ 10.24  
No activity
    --       --     $ --     $ --                                  
Outstanding-September 30, 2011
    622,350       185,100     $ 5.65     $ 9.90       561,933       150,000     $ 5.68     $ 11.23  

The weighted average remaining contractual life of all options outstanding, vested, and expected to vest at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately 4.38 and 5.13 years, respectively.  The weighted average remaining contractual life of the exercisable options outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately 4.11 and 4.38 years, respectively.


Note 3 – Business Segments

We organize our operations into two reportable business segments within the meaning of FASB ASC 280-10 - Segment Reporting.  Our reportable segments are (1) cinema exhibition and (2) real estate.  The cinema exhibition segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of multiplex cinemas.  The real estate segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of commercial properties.  Incident to our real estate operations we have acquired, and continue to hold, raw land in urban and suburban centers in Australia and New Zealand.

 
The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and the management of rental properties including our live theater assets (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended September 30, 2011
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 61,867     $ 6,484     $ (1,667 )   $ 66,684  
Operating expense
    50,310       2,496       (1,667 )     51,139  
Depreciation & amortization
    2,966       1,126       --       4,092  
General & administrative expense
    649       130       --       779  
Segment operating income
  $ 7,942     $ 2,732     $ --     $ 10,674  
 
Three months ended September 30, 2010
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 55,303     $ 6,695     $ (1,409 )   $ 60,589  
Operating expense
    46,220       2,142       (1,409 )     46,953  
Depreciation & amortization
    2,526       1,136       --       3,662  
General & administrative expense
    669       216       --       885  
Segment operating income
  $ 5,888     $ 3,201     $ --     $ 9,089  

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:
 
2011 Quarter
   
2010 Quarter
 
Total segment operating income
  $ 10,674     $ 9,089  
Non-segment:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    205       212  
General and administrative expense
    3,394       3,313  
Operating income
    7,075       5,564  
Interest expense, net
    (7,280 )     (3,615 )
Other income
    6       20  
Net gain on sale of assets
    1       --  
Income tax expense
    39       (885 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    454       293  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (5 )     1  
Net income
    290       1,378  
   Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
    (253 )     (136 )
Net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 37     $ 1,242  


Nine months ended September 30, 2011
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 173,577     $ 19,332     $ (5,000 )   $ 187,909  
Operating expense
    143,352       7,371       (5,000 )     145,723  
Depreciation & amortization
    8,869       3,633       --       12,502  
General & administrative expense
    1,930       524       --       2,454  
Segment operating income
  $ 19,426     $ 7,804     $ --     $ 27,230  

 
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 161,582     $ 18,247     $ (4,220 )   $ 175,609  
Operating expense
    134,193       6,519       (4,220 )     136,492  
Depreciation & amortization
    7,635       3,390       --       11,025  
Impairment expense
    --       2,239       --       2,239  
General & administrative expense
    1,896       922       --       2,818  
Segment operating income
  $ 17,858     $ 5,177     $ --     $ 23,035  
 
 
Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:
 
2011 Nine Months
   
2010 Nine Months
 
Total segment operating income
  $ 27,230     $ 23,035  
Non-segment:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    216       601  
General and administrative expense
    10,709       10,202  
Operating income
    16,305       12,232  
Interest expense, net
    (16,616 )     (10,779 )
Other income (expense)
    79       (690 )
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets
    (66 )     350  
Income tax benefit (expense)
    13,177       (13,669 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    1,087       910  
Income from discontinued operations
    35       31  
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
    1,656       --  
Net income (loss)
    15,657       (11,615 )
   Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
    (667 )     (505 )
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 14,990     $ (12,120 )


Note 4 – Operations in Foreign Currency

We have significant assets in Australia and New Zealand.  To the extent possible, we conduct our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis.  The carrying value of our Australian and New Zealand assets and liabilities fluctuate due to changes in the exchange rates between the US dollar and the functional currency of Australia (Australian dollar) and New Zealand (New Zealand dollar).  We have no derivative financial instruments to hedge against the risk of foreign currency exposure.

Presented in the table below are the currency exchange rates for Australia and New Zealand as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

   
US Dollar
 
   
September 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
Australian Dollar
  $ 0.9744     $ 1.0122  
New Zealand Dollar
  $ 0.7675     $ 0.7687  


Note 5 – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period after giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common shares had been issued.  Stock options and non-vested stock awards give rise to potentially dilutive common shares.  In accordance with FASB ASC 260-10 - Earnings Per Share, these shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation under the treasury stock method.  As noted in the table below, due to the small difference between the basic and diluted weighted average common shares, the basic and the diluted earnings (loss) per share are the same for each of the periods presented.  The following is a calculation of earnings (loss) per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):

 
   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 42     $ 1,241     $ 13,299     $ (12,151 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    (5 )     1       1,691       31  
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 37     $ 1,242     $ 14,990     $ (12,120 )
                                 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common share holders:
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
  $ --     $ 0.05     $ 0.58     $ (0.53 )
Earnings from discontinued operations
    --       --       0.07       --  
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common share holders:
  $ --     $ 0.05     $ 0.65     $ (0.53 )
Weighted average common stock – basic
    22,782,534       22,804,313       22,759,488       22,772,166  
Weighted average common stock – dilutive
    22,979,952       22,850,811       22,956,906       22,772,166  


For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the weighted average common stock – diluted included 197,418 of stock compensation and in-the-money incremental stock options.  For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the weighted average common stock – diluted included 46,498 of in-the-money incremental stock options.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded losses from continuing operations; therefore, we excluded 46,498 of in-the-money incremental stock options from the computation of diluted loss per share because they were anti-dilutive in that period.  In addition, 726,975 of out-of-the-money stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 760,952 of out-of-the-money stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.


Note 6 – Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment

Acquisition

On August 25, 2011, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California (the “CalOaks Cinema”) for $4.3 million made up of $3.9 million of cash and a $250,000 holdback note for certain offset charges to the purchase price (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities).  Pursuant to ASC 805-10-25, we are in the process of finalizing the purchase accounting for this acquisition.

On May 15, 2011, in conjunction with a potential purchase of the CalOaks cinema, we lent $2.3 million to the owner of the CalOaks cinema in exchange for a 90-day note receivable.  The note was securitized by three cinemas’ leases and had an annualized interest of 9.9%.  On August 25, 2011, as part of the CalOaks cinema acquisition, the note was paid off.

Disposal

On April 14, 2011, we sold our 66.7% share of the 5-screen Elsternwick Classic cinema located in Melbourne, Australia to our joint venture partner for $1.9 million (AUS$1.8 million) and recognized a gain on sale of a discontinued operation of $1.7 million (AUS$1.6 million).

 
Assets Held for Sale

Lake Taupo Motel – Held For Sale

Having obtained a rezoning of the property for multifamily residential use and completed the renovation of the existing motel into condominium units, we listed this property for sale in the fourth quarter of 2010.  The condensed statement of operations of Lake Taupo is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Total revenue
  $ 78     $ 49     $ 268     $ 209  
Total expenses
    82       48       233       179  


Taringa

While an anticipated sale earlier this year failed to mature, we continue to pursue selling this property.  Accordingly, it is held for sale at September 30, 2011.

Property Held For and Under Development

Held For Sale Property Reclassified to Held For Development – Burwood

In May 2010, we announced our intent to sell and began actively marketing our 50.6-acre Burwood development site in suburban Melbourne.  At June 30, 2011, we had not yet achieved that aim.  Pursuant to ASC 360-10-45, as twelve months had passed since this announcement and we lacked a firm commitment from a buyer, we reclassified the current carrying value of this property of $55.9 million (AUS$52.1 million) from assets held for sale to property held for development on our September 30, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet.  Nevertheless, discussions with qualified buyers continue, and it remains our plan to monetize at least the residential portions of this property.  Based on recent valuations, we continue to believe that the fair market value of the property less costs to sell is greater than the current carrying value; therefore, no asset impairment loss was recorded at the time of the reclassification.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned property held for and under development summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property Held For and Under Development
 
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Land
  $ 80,956     $ 31,689  
Construction-in-progress (including capitalized interest)
    4,835       4,013  
Property Held For and Under Development
  $ 85,791     $ 35,702  


At the beginning of 2010, we curtailed the development activities of our properties under development and are not currently capitalizing interest expense.  As a result, we did not capitalize any interest during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.

 
Property and Equipment

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned investments in property and equipment as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property and equipment
 
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Land
  $ 63,925     $ 64,845  
Building and improvements
    143,238       142,077  
Leasehold interests
    37,400       37,262  
Construction-in-progress
    406       408  
Fixtures and equipment
    100,342       99,399  
Total cost
    345,311       343,991  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (132,326 )     (123,741 )
Property and equipment, net
  $ 212,985     $ 220,250  

Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $4.0 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $11.7 million and $9.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.


Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Entities

Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting except for Rialto Distribution, which is accounted for as a cost method investment, and, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, included the following (dollars in thousands):

   
Interest
   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Rialto Distribution
    33.3%     $ --     $ --  
Rialto Cinemas
    50.0%       4,491       4,580  
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC
    25.0%       33       --  
Mt. Gravatt Cinema
    33.3%       6,118       5,835  
Total investments
          $ 10,642     $ 10,415  

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded our share of equity earnings (loss) from our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Rialto Distribution
  $ 234     $ 53     $ 346     $ 89  
Rialto Cinemas
    (35 )     23       (87 )     107  
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC
    --       --       33       --  
Mt. Gravatt Cinema
    255       217       795       714  
Total equity earnings
  $ 454     $ 293     $ 1,087     $ 910  

The 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date.  Pursuant to the lease on this property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease.
 
 
Note 8 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 350-20-35, Goodwill - Subsequent Measurement and Impairment, we perform an annual impairment review in the fourth quarter of our goodwill and other intangible assets on a reporting unit basis, or earlier if changes in circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired.  No such circumstances existed during the 2011 Nine Months.  As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had goodwill consisting of the following (dollars in thousands):

   
Cinema
   
Real Estate
   
Total
 
Balance as of December 31, 2010
  $ 16,311     $ 5,224     $ 21,535  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    (193 )     --       (193 )
Balance at September 30, 2011
  $ 16,118     $ 5,224     $ 21,342  

We have intangible assets other than goodwill that are subject to amortization, which we amortize over various periods.  We amortize our beneficial leases over the lease period, the longest of which is 30 years; our trade name using an accelerated amortization method over its estimated useful life of 45 years; and our other intangible assets over 10 years.  For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the amortization expense of intangibles totaled $525,000 and $692,000, respectively; and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the amortization expense of intangibles totaled $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively.  The accumulated amortization of intangibles includes $808,000 and $794,000 of the amortization of acquired leases which are recorded in operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

 
As of September 30, 2011
 
Beneficial Leases
   
Trade name
   
Other Intangible Assets
   
Total
 
Gross carrying amount
  $ 24,164     $ 7,220     $ 455     $ 31,839  
Less: Accumulated amortization
    10,762       2,413       335       13,510  
   Total, net
  $ 13,402     $ 4,807     $ 120     $ 18,329  

 
As of December 31, 2010
 
Beneficial Leases
   
Trade name
   
Other Intangible Assets
   
Total
 
Gross carrying amount
  $ 24,180     $ 7,220     $ 456     $ 31,856  
Less: Accumulated amortization
    9,435       1,993       272       11,700  
   Total, net
  $ 14,745     $ 5,227     $ 184     $ 20,156  


 
Note 9 – Prepaid and Other Assets

Prepaid and other assets are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Prepaid and other current assets
           
Prepaid expenses
  $ 1,469     $ 1,145  
Prepaid taxes
    840       1,044  
Deposits
    405       151  
Other
    1,154       1,196  
Total prepaid and other current assets
  $ 3,868     $ 3,536  
                 
Other non-current assets
               
Other non-cinema and non-rental real estate assets
  $ 1,134     $ 1,134  
Long-term deposits
    251       294  
Deferred financing costs, net
    3,622       3,830  
Interest rate swap at fair value – non-qualifying hedge
    --       446  
Other receivable
    --       6,750  
Tenant inducement asset
    1,081       1,327  
Straight-line rent asset
    2,632       2,627  
Mortgage notes receivable
    837       --  
Other
    --       128  
Total non-current assets
  $ 9,557     $ 16,536  

Investment in Notes Receivable

Other Receivable

On June 14, 2011, we received $6.8 million with respect to the principal and interest owed on a note previously received in connection with a settlement agreement.  We believe that further amounts are owed under that note, and we have begun litigation to collect such amounts.

Mortgage Notes Receivable

On February 14, 2011, we purchased for $2.8 million mortgage notes secured by certain properties.  These mortgage notes were in default on the date of acquisition and were acquired with the intention of acquiring the underlying properties.  In February 2011 and in September 2011, we foreclosed on two of these properties valued at $859,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, which are now classified as a part of properties held for development.  We are currently pursuing our remedies for the remaining mortgage note, which at September 30, 2011 remained in default.  We anticipate that we will ultimately acquire the remaining property.

 
Note 10 – Income Tax

The provision for income taxes is different from the amount computed by applying U.S. statutory rates to consolidated losses before taxes.  The significant reason for these differences is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Expected tax provision (benefit)
  $ (1 )   $ 259     $ 635     $ 186  
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
                               
Change in valuation allowance, other
    (881 )     (108 )     (15,721 )     41  
Foreign income tax provision
    59       204       354       497  
Foreign withholding tax provision
    112       319       326       586  
Tax effect of foreign tax rates on current income
    (1 )     (151 )     (148 )     (227 )
State and local tax provision
    180       129       414       342  
Federal tax litigation accrual
    493       233       963       12,244  
Actual tax provision (benefit)
  $ (39 )   $ 885     $ (13,177 )   $ 13,669  

Pursuant to ASC 740-10, a provision should be made for the tax effect of earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are not permanently invested outside the United States.  Our intent is that earnings of our foreign subsidiaries not be permanently invested outside the United States.

The Reading Australia consolidated group of subsidiaries generated earnings in the nine months ending September 30, 2011, but had no cumulative earnings available for distribution.  No current or cumulative earnings were available for distribution in the Reading New Zealand consolidated group of subsidiaries or in the Puerto Rico subsidiary as of September 30, 2011.  We have provided $453,000 in foreign withholding taxes connected with foreign retained earnings.

Deferred income taxes reflect the “temporary differences” between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, adjusted by the relevant tax rate.  In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10 – Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”), we record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized.  In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance.  ASC 740-10 presumes that a valuation allowance is required when there is substantial negative evidence about realization of deferred tax assets, such as a pattern of losses in recent years, coupled with facts that suggest such losses may continue.

In the period ending June 30, 2011, the Company determined that substantial negative evidence regarding the realizable nature of deferred tax assets continues to exist in the U.S., New Zealand, and Puerto Rico subsidiaries, arising from ongoing pre-tax financial losses.  Accordingly, the Company continues to record a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets available in these subsidiaries.  After consideration of a number of factors for the Reading Australia group, including its recent history of pretax financial income, its expected future earnings, the increase in market value of its real estate assets, which would cause taxable gain if sold, and having executed in June 2011 a credit facility of over $100 million to resolve potential liquidity issues, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets in Reading Australia will be realized.  Accordingly, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Reading Australia reversed $13.8 million of the valuation allowance previously recorded against its net deferred tax, which mainly reflects the loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income in Australia.

We have accrued $28.0 million in income tax liabilities as of September 30, 2011, of which $25.8 million has been classified as income taxes payable and $2.3 million have been classified as non-current tax liabilities.  As part of current tax liabilities, we have accrued $20.3 in connection with the negotiated Tax Court judgment, dated January 6, 2011, implementing our agreement with the IRS as to the final disposition of the 1996 tax litigation matter discussed in Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies below.  We believe these amounts represent an adequate provision for our income tax exposures, including income tax contingencies related to foreign withholding taxes described in Note 12 – Other Liabilities.

In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10-25 – Income Taxes - Uncertain Tax Positions (“ASC 740-10-25”), we record interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of income tax expense.

 
The following table is a summary of the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, for the periods ending September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
   
Year Ended December 31, 2010
   
Year Ended December 31, 2009
 
Unrecognized tax benefits – gross beginning balance
  $ 8,058     $ 11,412     $ 11,271  
Gross increases – prior period tax provisions
    199       --       92  
Gross decreases – prior period tax positions
    (6,035 )     --       --  
Gross increases – current period tax positions
    --       405       219  
Settlements
    --       (3,189 )     --  
Statute of limitations lapse
    --       (570 )     (170 )
Unrecognized tax benefits – gross ending balance
  $ 2,222     $ 8,058     $ 11,412  

At December 31, 2010, the total balance of the gross unrecognized tax benefit was $20.6 million (of which approximately $12.6 million represents interest).  Of this $20.6 million, approximately $19.5 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized.  For the nine months ending September 30, 2011 we recorded a reduction to our gross unrecognized tax benefits of $6.0 million and a decrease to tax interest of $10.5 million, reflecting the negotiated Tax Court judgment referenced above, which is a liability no longer in the nature of a reserve for uncertain positions.  The net tax balance is approximately $2.2 million, of which $1.1 million would impact the effective rate if recognized.

It is difficult to predict the timing and resolution of uncertain tax positions.  Based upon the Company’s assessment of many factors, including past experience and judgments about future events, it is probable that within the next 12 months the reserve for uncertain tax positions will increase within a range of $0.6 million to $0.9 million.  The reasons for such changes include but are not limited to tax positions expected to be taken during the next twelve months, reevaluation of current uncertain tax positions, expiring statutes of limitations, and interest related to the ”Tax Audit/Litigation” matter discussed below.

Our company and subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, income tax in various U.S. states, and income tax in Australia, New Zealand, and Puerto Rico.

Generally, changes to our federal and most state income tax returns for the calendar year 2007 and earlier are barred by statutes of limitations.  Certain domestic subsidiaries filed federal and state tax returns for periods before these entities became consolidated with us.  These subsidiaries were examined by the IRS for the years 1996 to 1999 and significant tax deficiencies were assessed for those years.  Those deficiencies have been settled, as discussed in “Tax Audit/Litigation,” Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies.  Our income tax returns of Australia filed since inception in 1995 are generally open for examination because of operating losses.  The income tax returns filed in New Zealand and Puerto Rico for calendar year 2006 and afterward generally remain open for examination as of September 30, 2011.
 
 
Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities)

Notes payable and subordinated debt (trust preferred securities) are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Name of Note Payable or Security
 
September 30, 2011
Interest Rate
   
December 31, 2010
Interest Rate
   
Maturity Date
   
September 30, 2011
Balance
   
December 31, 2010
Balance
 
BOSI Australian Corporate Credit Facility
    --       6.31%    
June 30, 2011
    $ --     $ 101,726  
NAB Australian Corporate Term Loan
    7.83%       --    
June 30, 2014
      85,991       --  
NAB Australian Corporate Revolver
    7.83%       --    
June 30, 2014
      --       --  
Australian Shopping Center Loans
    --       --      2011-2014       487       633  
New Zealand Corporate Credit Facility
    4.35%       4.75%    
March 31, 2012
      21,490       20,370  
Trust Preferred Securities
    9.22%       9.22%    
April 30, 2027
      27,913       27,913  
US Cinemas 1, 2, 3 Term Loan
    6.73%       6.73%    
July 1, 2012
      15,000       15,000  
US GE Capital Term Loan
    5.50%       5.50%    
December 1, 2015
      32,188       37,500  
US Liberty Theaters Term Loans
    6.20%       6.20%    
April 1, 2013
      6,620       6,727  
US Nationwide Loan 1
    8.50%       8.50%    
February 21, 2013
      598       730  
US Nationwide Loan 2
    --       8.50%    
February 21, 2011
      --       1,839  
US Sanborn Note
    7.00%       --    
January 31, 2012
      250       --  
US Sutton Hill Capital Note – Related Party
    8.25%       8.25%    
December 31, 2013
      9,000       9,000  
US Union Square Term Loan – Sun Life
    5.92%       5.92%    
May 1, 2015
      7,227       7,383  
Total
                        $ 206,764     $ 228,821  

NAB Australian Corporate Term Loan

On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with BOS International (“BOSI”) with a new credit facility from National Australia Bank (“NAB”) of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million).  NAB provided us term debt of $94.7 million (AUS$90.0 million) and $9.5 million (AUS$9.0 million) in line of credit which we used combined with our cash of $1.6 million (AUS$1.5 million) to pay down our $105.8 million (AUS$100.5 million) of outstanding BOSI debt.

The new three-tiered credit facility from NAB (the “NAB Credit Facility”) has a term of three years, due and payable June 30, 2014, and comprises a $87.7 million (AUS$90.0 million) term loan; a $9.7 million (AUS$10.0 million) revolving facility for which we do not have a balance at September 30, 2011; and a $4.9 million (AUS$5.0 million) guarantee facility.  This loan to Reading Entertainment Australia commenced on June 24, 2011 with an interest rate of between 2.90% and 2.15% above the BBSY bid rate.  The collateral pledged as security under the NAB Credit Facility is equivalent to that pledged to secure the expired BOSI Facility.  The NAB Credit Facility requires annual principal payments of between $6.8 million (AUS$7.0 million) and $8.8 million (AUS$9.0 million) which, it is anticipated, will be paid from Reading Entertainment Australia operating cash flows.  The covenants of the NAB Credit Facility include a fixed charge coverage ratio, a debt service cover ratio, an operating leverage ratio, a loan to value ratio, and other financial covenants.  Additionally, the NAB Credit Facility allows us to transfer only $3.9 million (AUS$4.0 million) per year outside of Australia.  On August 2, 2011, we paid down our NAB revolver by $9.7 million (AUS$9.0 million) resulting in a zero balance on that date.

In conjunction with this NAB Credit Facility, we entered into a five-year interest swap agreement which swaps 100% of our $86.0 million (AUS$88.3 million) variable rate term loan (decreasing in line with scheduled principal repayments) based on BBSY, for a 5.50% fixed rate.  For further information regarding our swap agreements, see Note 17 – Derivative Instruments.

US Nationwide Notes 1 & 2

Pursuant to the terms of the notes, on February 21, 2011, we paid off our Nationwide Loan 2 of $1.5 million with its $359,000 of accrued interest and paid off the accrued interest of $134,000 included in the Nationwide Loan 1 balance.

US Sanborn Note

On August 25, 2011, we issued a $250,000 note in partial payment of the purchase price for the CalOaks Cinema in Murrieta, California.  Under the applicable purchase and sale agreement and the terms of the note, our liability under this note is subject to reduction in the event that post-closing adjustments result in a reduction of the purchase price paid for that cinema.  The note carries an interest rate of 7.00% and a maturity date of January 31, 2012 (see Note 6 – Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment).

 
Bank of America Line of Credit

On July 21, 2011, we used $2.5 million of our $3.0 million line of credit with Bank of America for a letter of credit associated with the lease of our under construction new 8-screen Angelika Film Center cinema in the Mosaic District in the Greater Washington D.C. area.

 
Note 12 – Other Liabilities

Other liabilities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
September 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
Current liabilities
           
Security deposit payable
  $ 135     $ 141  
                 
Other liabilities
               
Foreign withholding taxes
  $ 5,944     $ 5,944  
Straight-line rent liability
    7,904       7,559  
Capital lease liability
    5,719       5,637  
Environmental reserve
    1,656       1,656  
Accrued pension
    4,695       4,406  
Interest rate swap – non-qualifying hedge
    4,301       181  
Acquired leases
    2,901       3,264  
Other payable
    2,246       2,603  
Other
    691       945  
Other liabilities
  $ 36,057     $ 32,195  

Included in our other liabilities are accrued pension costs of $4.7 million at September 30, 2011.  The benefits of our pension plans are fully vested, and, as such, no service costs were recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.  Our pension plans are unfunded; therefore, the actuarial assumptions do not include an estimate for expected return on plan assets.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $99,000 and $289,000, respectively, of interest cost and $82,000 and $246,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized $76,000 and $228,000, respectively, of interest cost and $76,000 and $228,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost.


Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

Unconsolidated Debt

Total debt of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities was $652,000 and $653,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Our share of unconsolidated debt, based on our ownership percentage, was $217,000 and $218,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  This debt is guaranteed by one of our subsidiaries to the extent of our ownership percentage.
 
 
U.S. Federal Tax Settlement

    As indicated in our 2010 Annual Report, our subsidiary, Craig Corporation (“Craig”), and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in July 2010, settled the proposed assessment by the IRS against Craig for the 1996 tax year.  The original assessment of $20.1 million plus interest was settled for $5.4 million plus interest, as reflected in the final judgment of the Tax Court dated January 6, 2011.  On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”)  agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000 (see Note 20 – Subsequent Events).  We anticipate federal and state tax deductions will be available for interest paid to the IRS and to state tax agencies, and that a federal deduction will be available for taxes paid to state tax agencies.

The impact of the settlement upon our liability for state taxes remains uncertain but if the adjustment to income agreed with the IRS were reflected on state returns, it would cause a state tax obligation of approximately $1.4 million plus interest and penalty, if any.  As of September 30, 2011, no deficiency has been asserted by the State of California, and we have made no final decision as to the course of action to be followed if a deficiency were to be asserted.


Note 14 – Noncontrolling interests

Noncontrolling interests are composed of the following enterprises:
 
·  
50% membership interest in Angelika Film Centers LLC (“AFC LLC”) owned by a subsidiary of iDNA, Inc.;
 
·  
25% noncontrolling interest in Australia Country Cinemas Pty Ltd (“ACC”) owned by Panorama Cinemas for the 21st Century Pty Ltd.; and
 
·  
25% noncontrolling interest in the Sutton Hill Properties, LLC owned by SHC.

The components of noncontrolling interests are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
September 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
AFC LLC
  $ 772     $ 681  
Australia Country Cinemas
    297       162  
Elsternwick unincorporated joint venture
    --       176  
Sutton Hill Properties
    (194 )     (167 )
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries
  $ 875     $ 852  

The components of income attributable to noncontrolling interests are as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
AFC LLC
  $ 192     $ 116     $ 566     $ 461  
Australia Country Cinemas
    129       83       265       201  
Elsternwick Unincorporated Joint Venture
    --       (3 )     25       41  
Sutton Hill Properties
    (68 )     (60 )     (189 )     (198 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
  $ 253     $ 136     $ 667     $ 505  

Elsternwick Sale

On April 14, 2011, we sold our 66.7% share of the 5-screen Elsternwick Classic cinema located in Melbourne, Australia to our joint venture partner for $1.9 million (AUS$1.8 million) and recognized a gain on sale of a discontinued operation of $1.7 million (AUS$1.6 million).

 
A summary of the changes in controlling and noncontrolling stockholders’ equity is as follows (dollars in thousands):

   
Reading International, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
   
Noncontrolling Interests
   
Total Stockholders’ Equity
 
Equity at – January 1, 2011
  $ 111,787     $ 852     $ 112,639  
Net income
    14,990       667       15,657  
Increase in additional paid in capital
    142       163       305  
Treasury stock purchased
    (328 )     --       (328 )
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    --       (655 )     (655 )
Cinema sale to noncontrolling shareholder
    --       (147 )     (147 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (6,570 )     (5 )     (6,575 )
Equity at – September 30, 2011
  $ 120,021     $ 875     $ 120,896  

   
Reading International, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
   
Noncontrolling Stockholders’ Equity
   
Total Stockholders’ Equity
 
Equity at – January 1, 2010
  $ 108,889     $ 1,374     $ 110,263  
Net income (loss)
    (12,120 )     505       (11,615 )
Decrease in additional paid in capital
    (581 )     --       (581 )
Treasury stock purchased
    (251 )     --       (251 )
Contributions to noncontrolling interests
    --       200       200  
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    --       (1,028 )     (1,028 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    7,808       30       7,838  
Equity at – September 30, 2010
  $ 103,745     $ 1,081     $ 104,826  


Note 15 – Common Stock

Common Stock Issuance

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we issued 174,825 and 148,616, respectively, of Class A Nonvoting shares to certain executive employees associated with their prior years’ stock grants.

For the stock options exercised during 2010, we issued for cash to employees of the corporation under our employee stock option plan 90,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.76 per share.

Treasury Stock Purchases

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we purchased 72,300 and 62,375, respectively, of Class A Nonvoting shares on the open market for $328,000 and $251,000, respectively.

 
Note 16 – Comprehensive Income (Loss)

U.S. GAAP requires that the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and/or losses on securities that are available-for-sale (“AFS”) be classified as comprehensive income (loss).  The following table sets forth our comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 290     $ 1,378     $ 15,657     $ (11,615 )
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)
    (18,218 )     16,538       (6,782 )     8,131  
Amortization of pension prior service costs
    82       76       246       228  
Realized gain (loss) on available for sale investments
    15       --       (9 )     --  
Unrealized loss on available for sale investments
    (138 )     (263 )     (30 )     (520 )
Comprehensive income (loss)
    (17,969 )     17,729       9,082       (3,776 )
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (253 )     (136 )     (667 )     (505 )
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    29       (51 )     5       (30 )
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc.
  $ (18,193 )   $ 17,542     $ 8,420     $ (4,311 )

The above foreign currency translation loss of $18.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 is as a result of the Australia to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 1.0732 to 0.9744 and the New Zealand to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 0.8284 to 0.7675 during the 2011 Quarter.  Additionally, the above foreign currency translation loss of $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as a result of the Australia to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 1.0122 to 0.9744 and the New Zealand to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 0.7687 to 0.7675 during the 2011 Nine Months.


Note 17 – Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to interest rate changes from our outstanding floating rate borrowings.  We manage our fixed to floating rate debt mix to mitigate the impact of adverse changes in interest rates on earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings.  From time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedging contracts, which effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to a fixed rate over the term of the interest rate swap.  In the case of our Australian borrowings, we are presently required to swap no less than 75% of our drawdowns under our Australian Corporate Credit Facility into fixed interest rate obligations.  In conjunction with this NAB Credit Facility, we entered into a five-year interest swap agreement, which swaps 100% of our variable rate loan based on BBSY for a 5.50% fixed rate loan.  Under our GE Capital Term Loan, we are required to swap no less than 50% of our variable rate drawdowns for the first three years of the loan agreement. We elected to swap 100% of the original loan balance on the GE Capital Term Loan and have contracted for balance step-downs that correspond with the loan’s principal payments through December 31, 2013.

The following table sets forth the terms of our interest rate swap derivative instruments at September 30, 2011:

Type of Instrument
 
Notional Amount
   
Pay Fixed Rate
   
Receive
Variable Rate
 
Maturity Date
Interest rate swap
  $ 34,688,000       1.340%       0.370%  
December 31, 2013
Interest rate swap
  $ 85,991,000       5.500%       4.930%  
June 30, 2016
 
 
In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, Subsequent Valuation of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Instruments (“FASB ASC 815-10-35”), we marked our interest rate swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet resulting in an increase in interest expense of $2.9 million and $4.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and a $308,000 and $189,000 decrease in interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.  At September 30, 2011, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap of $4.3 million as an other long-term liability.  At December 31, 2010, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap and a cap of $446,000 as other long-term assets and an interest rate swap of $181,000 as an other long-term liability.  In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as financial reporting hedges.


Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We measure the following items at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820-20, Fair Value of Financial Instruments (dollars in thousands):

     
Book Value
   
Fair Value
 
Financial Instrument
 
Level
   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Cash and cash equivalents
    1     $ 26,757     $ 34,568     $ 26,757     $ 34,568  
Investment in marketable securities
    1     $ 2,731     $ 2,985     $ 2,731     $ 2,985  
Interest rate swap & cap assets
    2     $ --     $ 446     $ --     $ 446  
Interest rate swap liability
    2     $ 4,301     $ 181     $ 4,301     $ 181  

ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The statement requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
 
·  
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
·  
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
 
·  
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data (were not used to value any of our assets requiring recurring measurements of fair value).

We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair values of the assets and liabilities:

Level 1 Fair Value Measurements – are based on market quotes of our marketable securities.

Level 2 Fair Value Measurements

Interest Rate Swaps – The fair value of interest rate swaps and cap are estimated based on market data and quotes from counter parties to the agreements which are corroborated by market data.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – we do not have any assets or liabilities that fall into this category for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Impaired Property - For assets measured on a non-recurring basis, such as real estate assets that are required to be recorded at fair value as a result of an impairment, our estimates of fair value are based on management’s best estimate derived from evaluating market sales data for comparable properties developed by a third party appraiser and arriving at management’s estimate of fair value based on such comparable data primarily based on properties with similar characteristics.

 
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we held certain items that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  These included cash equivalents, available for sale securities, and interest rate derivative contracts.  Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid, income-producing investments, all of which have maturities of 90 days or less.  Our available-for-sale securities primarily consist of investments associated with the ownership of marketable securities in Australia.  Derivative instruments are related to our economic hedge of interest rates.

The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future cash payments and cash receipts on the pay and receive legs of the interest swap agreements that have the net effect of swapping the estimated variable rate note payment stream for a fixed rate payment stream over the period of the swap.  The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the interest rate swap and cap agreements are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.  To comply with the provisions of ASC 820-10, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.  Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by our counterparties and us.  However, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.  As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  The nature of our interest rate swap derivative instruments is described in Note 17 – Derivative Instruments.

We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented and believe we have obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative contracts we hold.  Additionally, there were no transfers of assets and liabilities between levels 1, 2, or 3 during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value

The following table sets forth the carrying value and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

   
Book Value
   
Fair Value
 
Financial Instrument
 
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
   
September 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Notes payable
  $ 169,851     $ 191,908     $ 168,256     $ 173,129  
Notes payable to related party
  $ 9,000     $ 9,000     $ N/A     $ N/A  
Subordinated debt (trust preferred securities)
  $ 27,913     $ 27,913     $ 21,149     $ 18,241  

The fair value of notes payable to related party cannot be determined due to the related party nature of the terms of the notes payable.

We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage notes payable, our unsecured notes payable, trust preferred securities, and other debt instruments by performing discounted cash flow analyses using an appropriate market discount rate.  We calculated the market discount rate by obtaining period-end treasury rates for fixed-rate debt, or LIBOR rates for variable-rate debt, for maturities that correspond to the maturities of our debt, adding appropriate credit spreads derived from information obtained from third-party financial institutions.  These credit spreads take into account factors such as our credit standing, the maturity of the debt, whether the debt is secured or unsecured, and the loan-to-value ratios of the debt.

 
 
Note 19 – Casualty Losses

Our 8-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand, was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date.  We have earthquake and lost profits insurance on that facility and we are currently awaiting payment for our submitted claim.  We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011.

Additionally, the 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date.  Pursuant to the lease on the property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease.


Note 20 – Subsequent Events

Tax Settlement Payment Agreement

On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”) agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000.
 
 
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are an internationally diversified company principally focused on the development, ownership, and operation of entertainment and real property assets in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.  Our concentration in Australia and New Zealand assets has served us well in times of falling US Dollar values, and our strategy in focusing on hard assets is once again beginning to show strength, particularly as commercial real estate values in Manhattan have firmed.

Currently, we operate in two business segments:
 
·  
cinema exhibition, through our 57 multiplex cinemas; and
 
·  
real estate, including real estate development and the rental of retail, commercial and live theater assets.
 
We believe that these two business segments can complement one another, as we can use the comparatively consistent cash flows generated by our cinema operations to fund the front-end cash demands of our real estate development business.

We manage our worldwide cinema exhibition businesses under various different brands:
 
·  
in the US, under the Reading, Angelika Film Center, Consolidated Amusements, and City Cinemas brands;
 
·  
in Australia, under the Reading brand; and
 
·  
in New Zealand, under the Reading and Rialto brands.

We believe cinema exhibition to be a business that will likely continue to generate relatively consistent cash flows in the years ahead.  We base this on our belief that people will continue to spend some reasonable portion of their entertainment dollar on entertainment outside of the home and that, when compared to other forms of outside the home entertainment; movies continue to be a popular and competitively priced option.  While we see the cinema exhibition as a mature industry, we anticipate that our cinema operations will continue as our main source of cash flow and will support our real estate oriented activities and may from time to time add cinemas.  In this regard, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California and we anticipate opening a new “Angelika” 8-screen cinema in a new retail development currently under construction in Merrifield, Virginia in late 2012.

In short, while we do have operating company attributes, we see ourselves principally as a hard asset company and intend to add to shareholder value by building the value of our portfolio of tangible assets.

In addition, we may from time to time identify opportunities to expand our existing businesses and asset base, or to otherwise profit, through the acquisition of interests in other publicly traded companies, both in the United States and in the overseas jurisdictions in which we do business.  We may also take positions in private companies in addition to our investments in various private cinema joint ventures.

At September 30, 2011, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 433 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 3 cinemas with 29 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens.  One of these cinemas, our 8-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand, was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date and is currently planned to reopen on November 17, 2011.  We have earthquake and lost profits insurance on that facility and we are currently awaiting payment for our submitted claim.  Additionally, the 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was also damaged in the February 2011 earthquake, and has been closed since that date.  Pursuant to the lease on the property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease.  We have adjusted our cinema screen count to reflect the permanent closure of this cinema.

 
As mentioned above, we continue to consider opportunities to expand our cinema operations, while at the same time continuing to cull those cinema assets which are underperforming or have unacceptable risk profiles on a go forward basis.  During May and September 2010, we terminated the leases on two underperforming cinemas.  On April 14, 2011, we sold to our joint venture partner our 66.7% interest in the Elsternwick cinema for $1.9 million (AUS$1.8 million) and recognized a gain on sale of a discontinued operation of $1.7 million (AUS$1.6 million).

Although we have curtailed our real estate development activities, we remain opportunistic in our acquisitions of both cinema and real estate assets.  Our business plan going forward is to continue the build-out of our existing development properties and to seek out additional, profitable real estate development opportunities while continuing to use and judiciously expand our presence in the cinema exhibition business by identifying, developing, and acquiring cinema properties when and where appropriate.  In addition, we will continue to investigate potential synergistic acquisitions that may not readily fall into either of our two currently identified segments.

  On February 14, 2011, we purchased for $2.8 million mortgage notes secured by certain properties.  These mortgage notes were in default on the date of acquisition and were acquired with the intention of acquiring the underlying properties.  In February 2011 and in September 2011, we foreclosed on two of these properties valued at $859,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, which are now classified as a part of properties held for development.  We are currently pursuing our remedies for the remaining mortgage note, which at September 30, 2011 remained in default.  We anticipate that we will ultimately acquire the remaining property.

We are currently considering the potential sale of certain of our real estate assets.  We have taken steps to sell our Lake Taupo and Taringa Properties that are both held for sale at September 30, 2011.  Also, we continue to consider various methods to monetize all or at least the residential portion of our Burwood development site even though it cannot be classified as a property held for sale pursuant to ASC 360-10-45 (see Note 6 - Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment).

We continue to acquire, to dispose of, or to reposition our real estate assets in accordance with our business plan.  For the 2011 Quarter, we did not have any real estate acquisitions.


Results of Operations

At September 30, 2011, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 433 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 3 cinemas with 29 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens.  In real estate during the period, we (i) owned and operated four ETRC’s that we developed in Australia and New Zealand, (ii) owned the fee interests in four developed commercial properties in Manhattan and Chicago improved with live theaters comprising seven stages and ancillary retail and commercial space, (iii) owned the fee interests underlying one of our Manhattan cinemas, and (iv) held for development an additional seven parcels aggregating approximately 129 acres located principally in urbanized areas of Australia and New Zealand.

Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and the management of rental properties, including our live theater assets.  Our year-to-year results of operations were principally impacted by the fluctuation in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars vis-à-vis the US dollar resulting in an increase in results of operations for our foreign operations for 2011 compared to 2010.

 
The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business segments for the three (“2011 Quarter”) and nine (“2011 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2011 and the three (“2010 Quarter”) and nine (“2010 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended September 30, 2011
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 61,867     $ 6,484     $ (1,667 )   $ 66,684  
Operating expense
    50,310       2,496       (1,667 )     51,139  
Depreciation & amortization
    2,966       1,126       --       4,092  
General & administrative expense
    649       130       --       779  
Segment operating income
  $ 7,942     $ 2,732     $ --     $ 10,674  
 
Three months ended September 30, 2010
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 55,303     $ 6,695     $ (1,409 )   $ 60,589  
Operating expense
    46,220       2,142       (1,409 )     46,953  
Depreciation & amortization
    2,526       1,136       --       3,662  
General & administrative expense
    669       216       --       885  
Segment operating income
  $ 5,888     $ 3,201     $ --     $ 9,089  

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:
 
2011 Quarter
   
2010 Quarter
 
Total segment operating income
  $ 10,674     $ 9,089  
Non-segment:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    205       212  
General and administrative expense
    3,394       3,313  
Operating income
    7,075       5,564  
Interest expense, net
    (7,280 )     (3,615 )
Other income
    6       20  
Net gain on sale of assets
    1       --  
Income tax expense
    39       (885 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    454       293  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (5 )     1  
Net income
    290       1,378  
   Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
    (253 )     (136 )
Net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 37     $ 1,242  

Nine months ended September 30, 2011
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 173,577     $ 19,332     $ (5,000 )   $ 187,909  
Operating expense
    143,352       7,371       (5,000 )     145,723  
Depreciation & amortization
    8,869       3,633       --       12,502  
General & administrative expense
    1,930       524       --       2,454  
Segment operating income
  $ 19,426     $ 7,804     $ --     $ 27,230  
 
 
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
 
Cinema Exhibition
   
Real Estate
   
Intersegment Eliminations
   
Total
 
Revenue
  $ 161,582     $ 18,247     $ (4,220 )   $ 175,609  
Operating expense
    134,193       6,519       (4,220 )     136,492  
Depreciation & amortization
    7,635       3,390       --       11,025  
Impairment expense
    --       2,239       --       2,239  
General & administrative expense
    1,896       922       --       2,818  
Segment operating income
  $ 17,858     $ 5,177     $ --     $ 23,035  

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:
 
2011 Nine Months
   
2010 Nine Months
 
Total segment operating income
  $ 27,230     $ 23,035  
Non-segment:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    216       601  
General and administrative expense
    10,709       10,202  
Operating income
    16,305       12,232  
Interest expense, net
    (16,616 )     (10,779 )
Other income (expense)
    79       (690 )
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets
    (66 )     350  
Income tax benefit (expense)
    13,177       (13,669 )
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities
    1,087       910  
Income from discontinued operations
    35       31  
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
    1,656       --  
Net income (loss)
    15,657       (11,615 )
   Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
    (667 )     (505 )
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders
  $ 14,990     $ (12,120 )


Cinema Exhibition Segment

Included in the cinema exhibition segment above is revenue and expense from the operations of 52 cinema complexes with 433 screens during the 2011 Quarter and 51 cinema complexes with 413 screens during the 2010 Quarter and management fee income from 2 cinemas with 9 screens in both years.  The following tables detail our cinema exhibition segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Admissions revenue
  $ 19,103     $ 21,101     $ 3,459     $ 43,663  
Concessions revenue
    7,400       6,527       950       14,877  
Advertising and other revenues
    1,509       1,606       212       3,327  
Total revenues
    28,012       29,234       4,621       61,867  
                                 
Cinema costs
    23,159       20,677       3,658       47,494  
Concession costs
    1,198       1,366       252       2,816  
Total operating expense
    24,357       22,043       3,910       50,310  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    1,581       1,101       284       2,966  
General & administrative expense
    481       168       --       649  
Segment operating income
  $ 1,593     $ 5,922     $ 427     $ 7,942  

 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Admissions revenue
  $ 19,068     $ 16,455     $ 4,148     $ 39,671  
Concessions revenue
    7,039       4,946       1,052       13,037  
Advertising and other revenues
    1,308       1,032       255       2,595  
Total revenues
    27,415       22,433       5,455       55,303  
                                 
Cinema costs
    23,117       16,767       3,973       43,857  
Concession costs
    1,090       1,037       236       2,363  
Total operating expense
    24,207       17,804       4,209       46,220  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    1,599       669       258       2,526  
General & administrative expense
    491       178       --       669  
Segment operating income
  $ 1,118     $ 3,782     $ 988     $ 5,888  
 
·  
Cinema revenue increased for the 2011 Quarter by $6.6 million or 11.9% compared to the same period in 2010.  The 2011 Quarter increase was primarily related to increases in revenue from our U.S. and Australian cinema operations of $597,000 and $6.8 million, respectively.  These revenue increases were primarily related to an increase in box office attendance of 53,000 and 67,000, respectively, an increase in ticket prices in Australia, and an increase in the value of the Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below) compared to the same period last year.  Our New Zealand cinema revenue decreased by $834,000 primarily related to a 142,000 decrease in attendance which was exacerbated by the closure of our Christchurch New Zealand cinema since the February 22, 2011 earthquake in that city.  We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011.  Also, we anticipate that some of this loss will be made up by insurance proceeds.  We anticipate this cinema will reopen in November 2011.  This revenue decrease was somewhat offset by an increase in the value of the New Zealand dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).
 
·  
Operating expense increased for the 2011 Quarter by $4.1 million or 8.8% compared to the same period in 2010.  This increase followed the increased revenues noted above.  Overall, our operating expense as a percent of gross revenue decreased from 83.6% to 81.3%.
 
·  
Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2011 Quarter by $440,000 or 17.4% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to certain recently purchased 3D equipment being depreciated in the 2011 Quarter and the inclusion of the Charlestown cinema as an operating location since October 2010.
 
·  
General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $20,000 or 3.0% compared to the same period in 2010.
 
·  
For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.9% and 15.7%, respectively, since the 2010 Quarter, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.
 
·  
Because of the above, the cinema exhibition segment income increased for the 2011 Quarter by $2.1 million compared to the same period in 2010, a 34.9% increase.

 
The following tables detail our cinema exhibition segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Admissions revenue
  $ 54,870     $ 57,904     $ 9,724     $ 122,498  
Concessions revenue
    21,182       18,147       2,595       41,924  
Advertising and other revenues
    4,032       4,578       545       9,155  
Total revenues
    80,084       80,629       12,864       173,577  
                                 
Cinema costs
    66,728       58,408       10,317       135,453  
Concession costs
    3,365       3,875       659       7,899  
Total operating expense
    70,093       62,283       10,976       143,352  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    4,807       3,205       857       8,869  
General & administrative expense
    1,488       442       --       1,930  
Segment operating income
  $ 3,696     $ 14,699     $ 1,031     $ 19,426  

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Admissions revenue
  $ 55,981     $ 47,059     $ 12,520     $ 115,560  
Concessions revenue
    21,062       14,032       3,073       38,167  
Advertising and other revenues
    3,860       3,254       741       7,855  
Total revenues
    80,903       64,345       16,334       161,582  
                                 
Cinema costs
    67,789       47,482       11,922       127,193  
Concession costs
    3,275       3,012       713       7,000  
Total operating expense
    71,064       50,494       12,635       134,193  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    4,805       2,063       767       7,635  
General & administrative expense
    1,436       460       --       1,896  
Segment operating income
  $ 3,598     $ 11,328     $ 2,932     $ 17,858  

 
·  
Cinema revenue increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $12.0 million or 7.4% compared to the same period in 2010.  The 2011 Nine Months increase was primary related to a $16.3 million increase in revenue from our Australian cinema operations primarily related to a combined increase in admissions, ticket prices, and the value of the Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).  This increase from our Australian operations was offset by decreases in revenue from our U.S. and New Zealand cinema operations of $819,000 and $3.5 million, respectively, primarily related to decreases in cinema admissions of 101,000 and 445,000, respectively.  The poor attendance in New Zealand was exacerbated by the closure of our Christchurch New Zealand cinema since the February 22, 2011 earthquake in that city.  We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011.  Also, we anticipate that some of this loss will be made up by insurance proceeds.  The decreased revenue from New Zealand was somewhat offset by an increase in the value of New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).
 
 
·  
Operating expense increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $9.2 million or 6.8% compared to the same period in 2010.  This increase followed the increases and decreases in revenues for the three countries noted above and was affected by an increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).  Overall, our operating expense as a percent of gross revenue decreased from 83.0% to 82.6%.
 
·  
Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.2 million or 16.2% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to certain recently purchased 3D equipment being depreciated in the 2011 Nine Months and the inclusion of the Charlestown cinema as an operating location since October 2010.
 
·  
General and administrative costs increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $34,000 or 1.8% compared to the same period in 2010.
 
·  
For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.8% and 12.2%, respectively, since the 2010 Nine Months, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.
 
·  
Because of the above, the cinema exhibition segment income increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.6 million compared to the same period in 2010, an 8.8% increase.

Real Estate Segment

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Live theater rental and ancillary income
  $ 678     $ --     $ --     $ 678  
Property rental income
    398       3,569       1,839       5,806  
Total revenues
    1,076       3,569       1,839       6,484  
                                 
Live theater costs
    471       --       --       471  
Property rental cost
    101       1,477       447       2,025  
Total operating expense
    572       1,477       447       2,496  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    82       817       227       1,126  
General & administrative expense
    (7 )     119       18       130  
Segment operating income
  $ 429     $ 1,156     $ 1,147     $ 2,732  

 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Live theater rental and ancillary income
  $ 764     $ --     $ --     $ 764  
Property rental income
    440       3,880       1,611       5,931  
Total revenues
    1,204       3,880       1,611       6,695  
                                 
Live theater costs
    513       --       --       513  
Property rental cost
    101       1,147       381       1,629  
Total operating expense
    614       1,147       381       2,142  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    80       692       364       1,136  
General & administrative expense
    2       211       3       216  
Segment operating income
  $ 508     $ 1,830     $ 863     $ 3,201  
 
 
·  
Real estate revenue decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $211,000 or 3.2% compared to the same period in 2010.  Real estate revenue decreased from lower U.S. property revenues primarily due to a drop in live theater revenue in 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.  Additionally, revenue from our Australian properties decreased primarily due to a nonrecurring adjustment to the amortization of a tenant improvement and straight-line rent during the 2010 Quarter.  These decreases in revenue were offset by a year over year increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).
 
·  
Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2011 Quarter by $354,000 or 16.5% compared to the same period in 2010.  This increase generally followed a normal increase in real estate costs for Australia and New Zealand coupled with an increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).
 
·  
Depreciation and amortization expense for the real estate segment decreased by $10,000 or 0.9% for the 2011 Quarter compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to a correction to New Zealand depreciation expense classification offset by the aforementioned impact of currency exchange rates (see below).
 
·  
General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $86,000 or 39.8% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to a 2010 accrual for allowance for doubtful accounts in Australia not repeated in 2011.
 
·  
For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.9% and 15.7%, respectively, since the 2010 Quarter, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.
 
·  
As a result of the above, real estate segment income decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $469,000 or 14.7% compared to the same period in 2010.

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Live theater rental and ancillary income
  $ 2,229     $ --     $ --     $ 2,229  
Property rental income
    1,306       10,509       5,288       17,103  
Total revenues
    3,535       10,509       5,288       19,332  
                                 
Live theater costs
    1,424       --       --       1,424  
Property rental cost
    331       4,391       1,225       5,947  
Total operating expense
    1,755       4,391       1,225       7,371  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    245       2,426       962       3,633  
General & administrative expense
    22       446       56       524  
Segment operating income
  $ 1,513     $ 3,246     $ 3,045     $ 7,804  

 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
United States
   
Australia
   
New Zealand
   
Total
 
Live theater rental and ancillary income
  $ 2,239     $ --     $ --     $ 2,239  
Property rental income
    1,314       10,071       4,623       16,008  
Total revenues
    3,553       10,071       4,623       18,247  
                                 
Live theater costs
    1,516       --       --       1,516  
Property rental cost
    341       3,556       1,106       5,003  
Total operating expense
    1,857       3,556       1,106       6,519  
                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    240       2,056       1,094       3,390  
Loss on transfer of real estate held for sale to continuing operations
    --       2,239       --       2,239  
General & administrative expense
    3       893       26       922  
Segment operating income
  $ 1,453     $ 1,327     $ 2,397     $ 5,177  

·  
Real estate revenue increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.1 million or 5.9% compared to the same period in 2010.  Real estate revenue increased from our Australian and New Zealand properties primarily due to a year over year increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).
 
·  
Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $852,000 or 13.1% compared to the same period in 2010.  This increase generally followed the increased revenues noted above.
 
·  
Depreciation and amortization expense for the real estate segment increased by $243,000 or 7.2% for the 2011 Nine Months compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to the aforementioned impact of currency exchange rates (see below).
 
·  
We recorded a $2.2 million impairment charge related to our Taringa real estate property during the second quarter of 2010 primarily associated with the write-off of development costs of the project.
 
·  
General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Nine Months by $398,000 or 43.2% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to 2010 litigation costs for the Mackie case in Australia not repeated in 2011.
 
·  
For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand nine month average exchange rates increased by 15.8% and 12.2%, respectively, since the 2010 Nine Months, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.
 
·  
As a result of the above, real estate segment income increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $2.6 million or 50.7% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to the above mentioned impairment charge for our Taringa property in 2010.
 
 
Corporate

Quarterly Results

General and administrative expense increased by $81,000 in the 2011 Quarter compared to the 2010 Quarter, primarily related to one-time severance and temporarily duplicated labor costs associated with our transfer of our accounting functions from the U.S. and Australia to New Zealand; offset by, a decrease in legal and consulting fees primarily associated with our federal tax litigation, which was settled during July 2010.

Net interest expense increased by $3.7 million for the 2011 Quarter compared to the 2010 Quarter.  The increase in interest expense during the 2011 Quarter was primarily related to an increase in interest expense from the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps in 2011 over that of the same period in 2010.

For the 2011 Quarter, we recorded an income tax benefit of $39,000 compared to an $885,000 income tax expense primarily associated with our ongoing estimate of the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets in our Reading Australia operations.

 For the 2011 Quarter, we recorded an increase in our equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities of $161,000 primarily related to partnership distributions from our Rialto Distributions investment.

Nine Months Results

General and administrative expense increased by $507,000 in the 2011 Nine Months compared to the 2010 Nine Months, primarily related to one-time severance and temporarily duplicated labor costs associated with our transfer of our accounting functions from the U.S. and Australia to New Zealand; offset by, a decrease in legal and consulting fees primarily associated with our federal tax litigation, which was settled during July 2010.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $385,000 for the 2011 Nine Months primarily due to a correction to New Zealand depreciation expense classification.

Net interest expense increased by $5.8 million for the 2011 Nine Months compared to the 2010 Nine Months.  The increase in interest expense during the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to an increase in interest expense from the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps in 2011 over that of the same period in 2010.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an other income of $79,000 compared to an other expense of $690,000 for the 2010 Nine Months.  The 2011 Nine Months other income was primarily related to a gain on the sale of marketable securities and a change in certain long term liabilities and the 2010 Nine Months other expense of $690,000 included offsetting settlements related to our Whitehorse Center litigation and the 2008 sale of our interest in the Botany Downs cinema, a $605,000 loss associated our Mackie litigation, and a recovery of previously written-off receivables.

During the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded a $66,000 loss on sale of assets primarily related to the disposal of certain obsolete assets.  During the 2010 Nine Months, we recorded a $350,000 gain on sale of assets primarily related to a deferred gain on sale of a property.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an income tax benefit of $13.2 million primarily associated with a one-time tax provision adjustment of $14.4 million.  For the 2010 Nine Months, we recorded an income tax expense of $13.7 million primarily relating to additional tax accrual associated with our potential tax exposures related to our tax litigation settlement.  For more information regarding these tax provision and accrual adjustments see Note 10 – Income Tax.
 
 
For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an increase in our equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities of $177,000 primarily related to partnership distributions from our Rialto Distributions investment of $258,000 offset by a decrease in earnings from our Rialto Cinemas investment of $195,000.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded a gain on the sale of a discontinued operation for our Elsternwick Cinema of $1.7 million that is included in our income from discontinued operations.


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Reading International, Inc. Common Shareholders

During 2011, we recorded a net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders of $37,000 for the 2011 Quarter compared to $1.2 million for the 2010 Quarter and a net income of $15.0 million for the 2011 Nine Months compared to a net loss of $12.1 million for the 2010 Nine Months.  The change from a net loss to a net income from 2010 to 2011 was primarily a tax provision adjustment of $14.4 million in 2011 and an income tax accrual of $12.0 million for our tax litigation settlement and a property impairment charge of $2.2 million in 2010.

Acquisition

On August 25, 2011, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California for $4.3 million made up of $3.9 million of cash and a $250,000 note which is subject to reduction to reflect post-closing adjustments to the purchase price (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities).  Pursuant to ASC 805-10-25, we are in the process of finalizing the purchase accounting for this acquisition.


Business Plan, Capital Resources, and Liquidity

Business Plan

Our cinema exhibition business plan is to continue to identify, develop, and acquire cinema properties, where reasonably available, that allow us to leverage our cinema expertise and technology over a larger operating base.  Our real estate business plan is to continue development of our existing land assets to be sensitive to opportunities to convert our entertainment assets to higher and better uses, or, when appropriate, dispose of such assets.  Because we believe that current economic conditions are not conducive to obtaining the pre-construction leasing commitments necessary to justify commencement of construction, we currently focus our development efforts on improving and enhancing land entitlements and negotiating with end users for build to suit projects.  In addition, we review opportunities to monetize our assets where such action leads to a financially acceptable outcome.  We will also continue to investigate potential synergistic acquisitions that may not readily fall into either of our two currently identified segments.
 
 
Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our secured debt and lease obligations at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

   
2011
 
2012
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Debt
  $ 2,977   $ 49,695   $ 21,755   $ 74,582   $ 20,842   $ --   $ 169,851  
Notes payable to related parties
    --     --     9,000     --     --     --     9,000  
Subordinated notes (trust preferred securities)
    --     --     --     --     --     27,913     27,913  
Pension liability
    2     18     28     37     48     4,562     4,695  
Lease obligations
    7,743     29,225     27,002     23,454     19,635     81,546     188,605  
Estimated interest on debt
    3,948     12,908     10,427     5,529     2,061     13,602     48,475  
Total
  $ 14,670   $ 91,846   $ 68,212   $ 103,602   $ 42,586   $ 127,623   $ 448,539  

We base estimated interest on long-term debt on the anticipated loan balances for future periods calculated against current fixed and variable interest rates.

We adopted FASB ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes – Uncertain Tax Positions on January 1, 2007.  As of adoption, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions was $12.5 million decreasing to $2.2 million as of September 30, 2011.  On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”)  agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000.

Unconsolidated Debt

Total debt of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities was $652,000 and $653,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Our share of unconsolidated debt, based on our ownership percentage, was $217,000 and $218,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  This loan is guaranteed by one of our subsidiaries to the extent of our ownership percentage.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations (including contingent obligations) that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in the financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Currency Risk

We are subject to currency risk because we conduct a significant portion of our business in Australia and New Zealand.  Set forth below is a chart indicating the various exchange rates at certain points in time for the Australian and New Zealand Dollar vis-à-vis the US Dollar over the past 20 years.

 

 
We do not engage in currency hedging activities.  Rather, to the extent possible, we operate our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis.  Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies.  As a result, we have procured in local currencies the majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand.  Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand and our historic practice of funding our asset growth through local borrowings, our revenues are not yet significantly greater than our operating expenses and interest charges in these countries.  As we continue to progress with our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, the effect of variations in currency values will likely increase.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our obligations and commitments drives our liquidity position.  This is further affected by our ability to obtain adequate, reasonable financing and/or to convert non-performing or non-strategic assets into cash.

Currently, our liquidity needs arise primarily from:
 
·  
capital expenditure needs for our expanding digital and 3D implementations;
 
·  
working capital requirements; and
 
·  
debt servicing requirements.

Cash Liquidity

Of the $26.8 million cash on hand at September 30, 2011, $13.1 million was in Australia, $11.2 million was in the U.S., and $2.5 million was in New Zealand.  Of the $13.1 million in Australia, pursuant to our new NAB credit agreement, we are only able to transfer $3.9 million (AUS$4.0 million) per year outside of Australia, which has already been transferred to the U.S. for 2011, without the approval of the lender.  Of the $11.2 million in the U.S., $5.6 million is included in our Consolidated Entertainment subsidiary and is subject to certain debt covenants with GE Capital that limit the use of this cash outside of the subsidiary without the approval of the lender.  Therefore, at September 30, 2011, Reading had approximately $8.1 million of cash worldwide that is not restricted by covenants.

 
Long-Term Debt

Australian Credit Facility

On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with BOS International with a new credit facility from National Australia Bank of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million) (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities)).

New Zealand Credit Facility

The term of our New Zealand Credit Facility with Westpac matures on March 31, 2012.  Accordingly, the September 30, 2011 outstanding balance of this debt of $21.5 million (NZ$28.0 million) is classified as current on our balance sheet.  We are continuing discussions with our current lender as to the renewal of this facility.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operations was $17.1 million in the 2011 Nine Months compared to $15.5 million in the 2010 Nine Months.  The increase in cash provided by operations of $1.6 million was due primarily to a $4.4 million change in operating assets and liabilities (excluding $12.8 million accrual for our tax litigation settlement) and $2.8 million decrease of operational cash flows (including $12.8 million accrual for our tax litigation settlement).

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was $2.8 million compared to $15.8 million from the same period in 2010, a change of $13.0 million.  The $2.8 million of cash used in investing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to:
 
·  
$4.8 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;
 
·  
$3.9 million for the purchase of the CalOaks cinema;
 
·  
$2.8 million for the purchase of mortgage notes receivable; and
 
·  
$119,000 of a change in restricted cash;
 
offset by
 
·  
$124,000 of proceeds from the sale of marketable securities;
 
·  
$6.8 million of proceeds from the pay off of a long-term other receivable;
 
·  
$1.9 million of net proceeds from the sale of our 66.7% share of the 5-screen Elsternwick Classic cinema located in Melbourne, Australia.

The $15.8 million cash used for the 2010 Nine Months was primarily related to:
 
·  
$9.1 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;
 
·  
$5.4 million in acquisitions; and
 
·  
$1.6 million of change in restricted cash
 
offset by
 
·  
$200,000 in return of investment of unconsolidated entities.
 
 
Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was $21.1 million compared to $936,000 for the same period in 2010 resulting in a change of $20.2 million.  The $21.1 million in cash used in financing activities during the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to:
 
·  
$104.5 million of new borrowing including $104.2 million of loan proceeds from our new NAB loan net of $774,000 of capitalized borrowing costs and $1.1 million of borrowing from our New Zealand credit facility; and
 
·  
$163,000 in noncontrolling interests’ contributions.
 
offset by
 
·  
$124.9 million of loan repayments including the $105.8 million payoff of our Australian BOSI loan,  $4.3 million in loan repayment on our GE Capital Loan, $9.7 million payoff of our NAB revolver , $1.6 million loan repayment of our NAB term debt, and $2.0 million pay down of our Nationwide Notes;
 
·  
$328,000 of repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock; and
 
·  
$655,000 in noncontrolling interests’ distributions.

The $936,000 in cash used in financing activities during the 2010 Nine Months was primarily related to:
 
·  
$8.0 million of borrowing on our New Zealand credit facility;
 
·  
$7.2 million of borrowing proceeds from our new Union Square Theater Term Loan net of capitalized borrowing costs;
 
·  
$200,000 of contributions from noncontrolling interests; and
 
·  
$253,000 of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options;
 
offset by
 
·  
$15.4 million of loan repayments including $6.9 million for the pay off of our Union Square Term Loan, $5.0 million for the pay off of our SHC Loan, and $3.2 million pay down of our GE Capital Loan;
 
·  
$251,000 of repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock; and
 
·  
$1.0 million in noncontrolling interest distributions.
 
 
Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations and the most demanding in their calls on judgment.  Although accounting for our core business of cinema and live theater exhibition with a real estate focus is relatively straightforward, we believe our most critical accounting policies relate to:
 
·  
impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets;
 
·  
tax valuation allowance and obligations; and
 
·  
legal and environmental obligations.

We discuss these critical accounting policies in our 2010 Annual Report and advise you to refer to that discussion.

Financial Risk Management

Our internally developed risk management procedure, seeks to minimize the potentially negative effects of changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates on the results of operations.  Our primary exposure to fluctuations in the financial markets is currently due to changes in currency exchange rates between U.S and Australia and New Zealand, and interest rates.

As our operational focus continues to shift to Australia and New Zealand, unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses could materially affect our financial position.  We currently manage our currency exposure by creating, whenever possible, natural hedges in Australia and New Zealand.  This involves local country sourcing of goods and services as well as borrowing in local currencies.

Our exposure to interest rate risk arises out of our long-term debt obligations.  Consistent with our internally developed guidelines, we seek to reduce the negative effects of changes in interest rates by changing the character of the interest rate on our long-term debt, converting a variable rate into a fixed rate.  Our internal procedures allow us to enter into derivative contracts on certain borrowing transactions to achieve this goal.  Our Australian credit facilities provide for floating interest rates but require that not less than a certain percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations using derivative contracts.

In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, Subsequent Valuation of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Instruments (“FASB ASC 815-10-35”), we marked our interest rate swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet resulting in an increase in interest expense of $2.9 million and $4.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and a $308,000 and $189,000 decrease in interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.  At September 30, 2011, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap of $4.3 million as an other long-term liability.  At December 31, 2010, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap and a cap of $446,000 as other long-term assets and an interest rate swap of $181,000 as an other long-term liability.  In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as financial reporting hedges.

Inflation

We continually monitor inflation and the effects of changing prices.  Inflation increases the cost of goods and services used.  Competitive conditions in many of our markets restrict our ability to recover fully the higher costs of acquired goods and services through price increases.  We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation by implementing continuous process improvement solutions to enhance productivity and efficiency and, as a result, lower costs and operating expenses.  In our opinion, we have managed the effects of inflation appropriately, and, as a result, it has not had a material impact on our operations and the resulting financial position or liquidity.
 
 
Litigation

We are currently, and are from time to time, involved with claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business.  Some examples of the types of claims are:
 
·  
contractual obligations;
 
·  
insurance claims;
 
·  
IRS claims;
 
·  
employment matters;
 
·  
environmental matters; and
 
·  
anti-trust issues.

Where we are the plaintiffs, we expense all legal fees on an on-going basis and make no provision for any potential settlement amounts until received.  In Australia, the prevailing party is entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees, which typically works out to be approximately 60% of the amounts actually spent where first class legal counsel is engaged at customary rates.  Where we are a plaintiff, we have likewise made no provision for the liability for the defendant’s attorneys' fees in the event we are determined not to be the prevailing party.

Where we are the defendants, we accrue for probable damages, which insurance may not cover, as they become known and can be reasonably estimated.  In our opinion, any claims and litigation in which we are currently involved are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.  However, we do not give any assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such claims and litigation.  The resolution of such claims and litigation could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending on the level of income for such period.  Except as noted below, there have been no material changes to our litigation exposure since our 2010 Annual Report.

U.S. Federal Tax Settlement

As indicated in our 2010 Annual Report, our subsidiary, Craig Corporation (“Craig”), and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in July 2010, settled the proposed assessment by the IRS against Craig for the 1996 tax year.  The original assessment of $20.1 million plus interest was settled for $5.4 million plus interest, as reflected in the final judgment of the Tax Court dated January 6, 2011.  On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”)  agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000.  We anticipate federal and state tax deductions will be available for interest paid to the IRS and to state tax agencies, and that a federal deduction will be available for taxes paid to state tax agencies.

The impact of the settlement upon our liability for state taxes remains uncertain but if the adjustment to income agreed with the IRS were reflected on state returns, it would cause a state tax obligation of approximately $1.4 million plus interest and penalty.  As of September 30, 2011, no deficiency has been asserted by the State of California, and we have made no final decision as to the course of action to be followed if a deficiency were to be asserted.


Forward-Looking Statements

Our statements in this interim quarterly report contain a variety of forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements reflect only our expectations regarding future events and operating performance and necessarily speak only as of the date the information was prepared.  We cannot guarantee that our expectation will be realized in whole or in part.  You can recognize these statements by our use of words such as, by way of example, “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” and “anticipate” or other similar terminology.
 
 
These forward-looking statements reflect our expectation after having considered a variety of risks and uncertainties.  However, they are necessarily the product of internal discussion and do not necessarily completely reflect the views of individual members of our Board of Directors or of our management team.  Individual Board members and individual members of our management team may have different views as to the risks and uncertainties involved, and may have different views as to future events or our operating performance.

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying our forward-looking statements are the following:
 
·  
With respect to our cinema operations:
 
o  
The number and attractiveness to movie goers of the films released in future periods;
 
o  
The amount of money spent by film distributors to promote their motion pictures;
 
o  
The ability to implement digital and 3D projectors throughout our cinema circuits worldwide;
 
o  
The licensing fees and terms required by film distributors from motion picture exhibitors in order to exhibit their films;
 
o  
The continued willingness of moviegoers to spend money on our concession items;
 
o  
The comparative attractiveness of motion pictures as a source of entertainment and willingness and/or ability of consumers (i) to spend their dollars on entertainment and (ii) to spend their entertainment dollars on movies in an outside the home environment;
 
o  
The extent to which we encounter competition from other cinema exhibitors, from other sources of outside of the home entertainment, and from inside the home entertainment options, such as “home theaters” and competitive film product distribution technology such as, by way of example, cable, satellite broadcast, DVD and VHS rentals and sales, and so called “movies on demand”; and
 
o  
The extent to and the efficiency with which, we are able to integrate acquisitions of cinema circuits with our existing operations.
 
·  
With respect to our real estate development and operation activities:
 
o  
The rental rates and capitalization rates applicable to the markets in which we operate and the quality of properties that we own;
 
o  
The extent to which we can obtain on a timely basis the various land use approvals and entitlements needed to develop our properties;
 
o  
The risks and uncertainties associated with real estate development;
 
o  
The availability and cost of labor and materials;
 
o  
Competition for development sites and tenants;
 
o  
Environmental remediation issues; and
 
o  
The extent to which our cinemas can continue to serve as an anchor tenant who will, in turn, be influenced by the same factors as will influence generally the results of our cinema operations.
 
 
·  
With respect to our operations generally as an international company involved in both the development and operation of cinemas and the development and operation of real estate:
 
o  
Our ongoing access to borrowed funds and capital and the interest that must be paid on that debt and the returns that must be paid on such capital;
 
o  
The relative values of the currency used in the countries in which we operate;
 
o  
Changes in government regulation;
 
o  
Our labor relations and costs of labor (including future government requirements with respect to pension liabilities, disability insurance and health coverage, and vacations and leave);
 
o  
Our exposure from time to time to legal claims and to uninsurable risks such as those related to our historic railroad operations, including potential environmental claims and health related claims relating to alleged exposure to asbestos or other substances now or in the future, recognized as being possible causes of cancer or other health related problems;
 
o  
Changes in future effective tax rates and the results of currently ongoing and future potential audits by taxing authorities having jurisdiction over our various companies; and
 
o  
Changes in applicable accounting policies and practices.

The above list is not exhaustive, as business is inherently unpredictable, risky, and subject to influence by numerous factors outside of our control.  Such factors include changes in government regulation or policy, competition, interest rates, supply, technological innovation, changes in consumer taste and fancy, weather, and the extent to which consumers in our markets have the economic ability to spend money on beyond-the-home entertainment.

Given the variety and unpredictability of the factors that will ultimately influence our businesses and our results of operation, it naturally follows that no guarantees can be given that any of our forward-looking statements will ultimately prove to be correct.  Actual results will undoubtedly vary and there is no guarantee as to how our securities will perform either when considered in isolation or when compared to other securities or investment opportunities.

Finally, please understand that we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any of our forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable law.  Accordingly, you should always note the date to which our forward-looking statements speak.

Additionally, certain of the presentations included in this interim quarterly report may contain “non-GAAP financial measures.”  In such case, we will make available in connection with such statements a reconciliation of this information to our GAAP financial statements.
 
 
 
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

The SEC requires that registrants include information about potential effects of changes in currency exchange and interest rates in their filings.  Several alternatives, all with some limitations, have been offered.  We base the following discussion on a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates.  This analysis is constrained by several factors, including the following:
 
·  
It is based on a single point in time; and
 
·  
It does not include the effects of other complex market reactions that would arise from the changes modeled.

Although the results of such an analysis may be useful as a benchmark, they should not be viewed as forecasts.

At September 30, 2011, approximately 56% and 17% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand), respectively, including approximately $15.5 million in cash and cash equivalents.  At December 31, 2010, approximately 55% and 16% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand) including approximately $18.1 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies.  As a result, we have procured in local currencies a majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand.  Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand, our revenue is not yet significantly greater than our operating and interest expenses.  Despite this natural hedge, recent movements in foreign currencies have had an effect on our current earnings.  Although foreign currency has had a nominal effect on our current earnings, the effect of the translation adjustment on our assets and liabilities noted in our other comprehensive income was a decrease of $18.2 million and $6.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.  As we continue to progress our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, we cannot assure you that the foreign currency effect on our earnings will be negligible in the future.

Historically, our policy has been to borrow in local currencies to finance the development and construction of our ETRCs in Australia and New Zealand whenever possible.  As a result, the borrowings in local currencies have provided somewhat of a natural hedge against the foreign currency exchange exposure.  Even so, and as a result of our issuance of fully subordinated notes (TPS) in 2007, and their subsequent partial repayment, approximately 56% and 52% of our Australian and New Zealand assets, respectively, remain subject to such exposure unless we elect to hedge our foreign currency exchange between the US and Australian and New Zealand dollars.  If the foreign currency rates were to fluctuate by 10% the resulting change in Australian and New Zealand assets would be $13.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and the change in our quarterly net income would be $1.9 million and $116,000, respectively.  Presently, we have no plan to hedge such exposure.
 
We record unrealized foreign currency translation gains or losses that could materially affect our financial position.  As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we have recorded a cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gain of approximately $52.3 million and $59.1 million, respectively.

Historically, we maintain most of our cash and cash equivalent balances in short-term money market instruments with original maturities of three months or less.  Due to the short-term nature of such investments, a change of 1% in short-term interest rates would not have a material effect on our financial condition.
 
 
While we have typically used fixed rate financing (secured by first mortgages) in the U.S., fixed rate financing is typically not available to corporate borrowers in Australia and New Zealand.  The majority of our Australian and New Zealand bank loans have variable rates.  The Australian facility provides for floating interest rates, but requires that not less than a certain percentage of the loan be swapped into fixed rate obligations (see Financial Risk Management above).  If we consider the interest rate swaps, a 1% increase or decrease in short-term interest rates would have resulted in approximately $70,000 increase or decrease in our 2011 Quarter’s Australian and New Zealand interest expense.
 
 
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such, term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 
PART II – Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

For a description of legal proceedings, please refer to Item 3 entitled Legal Proceedings contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.


Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

For a description of grants of stock to certain executives, see the Stock-Based Compensation section under see Note 2 – Equity and Stock-Based Compensation, above.


Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.


Item 4 - Removed and Reserved

None.


Item 5 - Other Information

Not applicable.


Item 6 - Exhibits

31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32
Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.




Date:
November 3, 2011
By:
/s/ James J. Cotter
     
James J. Cotter
     
Chief Executive Officer



Date:
November 3, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
     
Andrzej Matyczynski
     
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
exhibit31_1.htm
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James J. Cotter, certify that:

1)  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International, Inc.;

2)  
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;

c)  
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By:
/s/ James J. Cotter
 
James J. Cotter
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
November 3, 2011
exhibit31_2.htm
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrzej Matyczynski, certify that:

1)  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International, Inc.;

2)  
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;

c)  
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)  
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)  
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6)  
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By:
/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
 
Andrzej Matyczynski
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
November 3, 2011
exhibit32.htm
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Reading International, Inc. (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
 
·  
The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
·  
The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  November 3, 2011



/s/ James J. Cotter                                                                
Name:           James J. Cotter
Title:           Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski                                                                
Name:           Andrzej Matyczynski
Title:           Chief Financial Officer