Reading International

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

form10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

__________________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ___________

Commission file number 1-8625

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	95-3885184 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

500 Citadel Drive, Suite 300 Commerce, CA (Address of principal executive offices)	90040 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (213) 235-2240

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 3, 2011, there were 21,411,348 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share and 1,495,490 shares of Class B Voting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share outstanding.

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I – Financial Information	1
Item 1 – Financial Statements	1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	44
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	46
PART II – Other Information	47
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	47
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47
Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities	47
Item 4 - Removed and Reserved	47
Item 5 - Other Information	47
Item 6 - Exhibits	47
SIGNATURES	48

Table of Contents

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1 – Financial Statements

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands except par value amounts)

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,757		$	34,568
Receivables		4,664			5,470
Inventory		805			989
Investment in marketable securities		2,731			2,985
Restricted cash		2,253			2,159
Deferred tax asset, net		770			--
Prepaid and other current assets		3,868			3,536
Assets held for sale		4,155			55,210
Total current assets		46,003			104,917

Property held for and under development		85,791			35,702
Property & equipment, net		212,985			220,250
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		10,642			10,415
Investment in Reading International Trust I		838			838
Goodwill		21,342			21,535
Intangible assets, net		18,329			20,156
Deferred tax asset, net		12,996			--
Other assets		9,557			16,536
Total assets	$	418,483		$	430,349

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	14,559		$	15,930
Film rent payable		4,390			5,757
Notes payable – current portion		49,114			108,124
Taxes payable		25,778			23,872
Deferred current revenue		7,637			8,727
Other current liabilities		135			141
Total current liabilities		101,613			162,551
Notes payable – long-term portion		120,737			83,784
Notes payable to related party – long-term		9,000			9,000
Subordinated debt		27,913			27,913
Noncurrent tax liabilities		2,267			2,267
Other liabilities		36,057			32,195
Total liabilities		297,587			317,710
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A non-voting common stock, par value $0.01, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 31,675,518 issued and 21,411,348 outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 31,500,693 issued and 21,308,823 outstanding at December 31, 2010		218			216
Class B voting common stock, par value $0.01, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,495,490 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		15			15
Nonvoting preferred stock, par value $0.01, 12,000 shares authorized and no issued or outstanding shares at September 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		--			--
Additional paid-in capital		134,376			134,236
Accumulated deficit		(61,045	)		(76,035	)
Treasury shares		(4,093	)		(3,765	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		50,550			57,120
Total Reading International, Inc. stockholders’ equity		120,021			111,787
Noncontrolling interests		875			852
Total stockholders’ equity		120,896			112,639
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	418,483		$	430,349

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-1-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Operating Revenue
Cinema	$	61,867		$	55,303		$	173,577		$	161,582
Real estate		4,817			5,286			14,332			14,027
Total operating revenue		66,684			60,589			187,909			175,609
Operating expense
Cinema		48,643			44,811			138,352			129,973
Real estate		2,496			2,142			7,371			6,519
Depreciation and amortization		4,297			3,874			12,718			11,626
Impairment expense		--			--			--			2,239
General and administrative		4,173			4,198			13,163			13,020
Total operating expense		59,609			55,025			171,604			163,377

Operating income		7,075			5,564			16,305			12,232

Interest income		466			340			1,307			986
Interest expense		(7,746	)		(3,955	)		(17,923	)		(11,765	)
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets		1			--			(66	)		350
Other income (expense)		6			20			79			(690	)
Income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense), equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities, and discontinued operations		(198	)		1,969			(298	)		1,113
Income tax benefit (expense)		39			(885	)		13,177			(13,669	)
Income (loss) before equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities, and discontinued operations		(159	)		1,084			12,879			(12,556	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		454			293			1,087			910
Income (loss) before discontinued operations		295			1,377			13,966			(11,646	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		(5	)		1			35			31
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		--			--			1,656			--
Net income (loss)	$	290		$	1,378		$	15,657		$	(11,615	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(253	)		(136	)		(667	)		(505	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	37		$	1,242		$	14,990		$	(12,120	)
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders – basic and diluted:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	--		$	0.05		$	0.58		$	(0.53	)
Earnings from discontinued operations, net		--			--			0.07			--
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	--		$	0.05		$	0.65		$	(0.53	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic		22,782,534			22,804,313			22,759,488			22,772,166
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted		22,979,952			22,850,811			22,956,906			22,772,166

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	15,657		$	(11,615	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Gain) loss recognized on foreign currency transactions		14			(12	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(1,087	)		(910	)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		598			910
Loss provision on impairment of asset		--			2,239
Gain on sale of assets		(1,590	)		(350	)
Change in valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets		(15,127	)		--
Gain on sale of marketable securities		(8	)		--
Depreciation and amortization		12,718			11,642
Amortization of prior service costs		246			228
Amortization of above and below market leases		302			682
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,001			982
Amortization of straight-line rent		689			(279	)
Stock-based compensation expense		142			44
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in receivables		753			3,890
Decrease in prepaid and other assets		142			31
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,171	)		(832	)
Decrease in film rent payable		(1,323	)		(2,500	)
Increase taxes payable		1,911			12,813
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues and other liabilities		3,214			(1,482	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		17,081			15,481
Investing activities
Acquisitions		(3,917	)		(5,359	)
Purchases of and additions to property and equipment		(4,761	)		(9,057	)
Change in restricted cash		(119	)		(1,573	)
Purchase of notes receivable		(2,784	)		--
Purchase of marketable securities		--			(62	)
Sale of marketable securities		124			30
Distributions of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		--			200
Collection of note receivable		6,750			--
Cinema sale proceeds from noncontrolling shareholder		1,867			--
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,840	)		(15,821	)
Financing activities
Repayment of long-term borrowings		(124,859	)		(15,370	)
Proceeds from borrowings		105,311			15,525
Capitalized borrowing costs		(774	)		(265	)
Repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock		(328	)		(251	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		--			253
Noncontrolling interest contributions		163			200
Noncontrolling interest distributions		(655	)		(1,028	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(21,142	)		(936	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(910	)		1,388

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(7,811	)		112
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		34,568			24,612

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	26,757		$	24,724

Supplemental Disclosures
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on borrowings	$	12,907		$	10,712
Income taxes	$	1,881		$	594
Non-cash transactions
Foreclosure of a mortgage note to obtain title of the underlying property	$	1,125		$	--
Reduction in note payable associated with acquisition purchase price adjustment	$	--		$	4,381
Deemed distribution	$	--		$	877
Capital lease asset addition	$	--		$	4,697
Capital lease obligation	$	--		$	5,573

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Reading International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RDI” and collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, the “Company,” “Reading” and “we,” “us,” or “our”), was founded in 1983 as a Delaware corporation and reincorporated in 1999 in Nevada. Our businesses consist primarily of:

·	the development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand; and

·	the development, ownership, and operation of retail and commercial real estate in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting. As such, certain information and disclosures typically required by US GAAP for complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The financial information presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the “September Report”) should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Annual Report which contains the latest audited financial statements and related notes. The periods presented in this document are the three (“2011 Quarter”) and nine (“2011 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2011 and the three (“2010 Quarter”) and nine (“2010 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2010.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of our operations, and cash flows as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 have been made. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year.

Marketable Securities

We had investments in marketable securities of $2.7 million and $3.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We account for these investments as available for sale investments. We assess our investment in marketable securities for other-than-temporary impairments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320-10 for each applicable reporting period. These investments have a cumulative unrealized gain (loss) of $5,000 and $(43,000) included in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $138,000 and $30,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $263,000 and $520,000, respectively. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we sold $21,000 and $126,000, respectively, of our marketable securities with a realized gain of $11,000 and $2,000, respectively.

Refinanced Long-Term Debt

On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility with BOS International (“BOSI”) of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with the proceeds from a new credit facility from National Australia Bank (“NAB”) of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million). See Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities).

-4-

Table of Contents

Plans to Refinance Credit Facility

The term of our New Zealand Credit Facility with Westpac matures on March 31, 2012. Accordingly, the September 30, 2011 outstanding balance of this debt of $21.5 million (NZ$28.0 million) is classified as current on our balance sheet. We are currently in discussions with our lender as to the renewal of this facility.

Deferred Leasing Costs

We amortize direct costs incurred in connection with obtaining tenants over the respective term of the lease on a straight-line basis.

Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize direct costs incurred in connection with obtaining financing over the term of the loan using the effective interest method, or the straight-line method, if the result is not materially different. In addition, interest on loans with increasing interest rates and scheduled principal pre-payments, is also recognized using the effective interest method.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During 2011

FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06 – Fair Value Measurements

ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about the transfers of classifications among the fair value classification levels and the reasons for those changes and separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the presentation of the roll forward of Level 3 assets and liabilities. Those disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this portion of the ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU No. 2011-05 - Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income

ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, eliminating the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. Under either choice, items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income are required to be presented on the face of the financial statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. This amendment is effective for our Company in 2012 and will be applied retrospectively. This amendment will change the manner in which the Company presents comprehensive income but will not change any of the balances or activity.

FASB ASU No. 2011-08 - Intangibles—Goodwill and Other

ASU No. 2011-08 relates to a change in the annual test of goodwill for impairment. The statement permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. This amendment will change the manner in which the Company performs its goodwill impairment test.

-5-

Table of Contents

Note 2 – Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we issued 174,825 and 148,616, respectively, of Class A Nonvoting shares to certain executive employees associated with the vesting of their prior years’ stock grants. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we accrued $188,000 and $563,000, respectively, in compensation expense associated with the vesting of executive employee stock grants.

Employee/Director Stock Option Plan

We have a long-term incentive stock option plan that provides for the grant to eligible employees, directors, and consultants of incentive or nonstatutory options to purchase shares of our Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and Class B Voting Common Stock. Our 1999 Stock Option Plan expired in November 2009, and was replaced by our new 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the holders of our Class B Voting Common Stock in May 2010.

When the Company’s tax deduction from an option exercise exceeds the compensation cost resulting from the option, a tax benefit is created. FASB ASC 718-20 relating to Stock-Based Compensation (“FASB ASC 718-20”), requires that excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises be reflected as financing cash inflows instead of operating cash inflows. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there was no impact to the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows because there were no recognized tax benefits from stock option exercises during these periods.

FASB ASC 718-20 requires companies to estimate forfeitures. Based on our historical experience and the relative market price to strike price of the options, we do not currently estimate any forfeitures of vested or unvested options.

In accordance with FASB ASC 718-20, we estimate the fair value of our options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which takes into account assumptions such as the dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate, the expected stock price volatility, and the expected life of the options. We exclude the dividend yield from the calculation, as we intend to retain all earnings. We expense the estimated grant date fair values of options issued on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

For the 157,700 options granted during 2010, we estimated the fair value of these options at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	2010
Stock option exercise price		$5.07
Risk-free interest rate		2.736%
Expected dividend yield		--
Expected option yield		7.23 yrs
Expected volatility		33.01%
Weighted average fair value		$1.88

We did not grant any options during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

-6-

Table of Contents

Based on prior years’ assumptions, and, in accordance with the FASB ASC 718-20, we recorded compensation expense for the total estimated grant date fair value of stock options that vested of $47,000 and $142,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $23,000 and $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, the total unrecognized estimated compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted was $156,000, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average vesting period of 0.95 years. 90,000 options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 having a realized value of $138,000 for which we received $253,000 of cash. There were no options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The grant date fair value of options vesting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $47,000 and $142,000, respectively, and $23,000 and $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The intrinsic, unrealized value of all options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, at September 30, 2011 was $273,000 of which 91.3% are currently exercisable.

Pursuant to both our 1999 Stock Option Plan and our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, all stock options expire within ten years of their grant date. The aggregate total number of shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and Class B Voting Common Stock authorized for issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan is 1,250,000. At the discretion of our Compensation and Stock Options Committee, the vesting period of stock options is usually between zero and four years.

We had the following stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Common Stock Options Outstanding					Weighted Average Exercise Price of Options Outstanding				Common Stock Exercisable Options				Weighted Average Price of Exercisable Options
	Class A			Class B		Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B
Outstanding- January 1, 2010		589,750			150,000	$	5.51	$	10.24		534,750		150,000	$	5.62	$	10.24
Granted		122,600			35,100	$	4.23	$	8.47
Exercised		(90,000	)		--	$	2.76	$	--
Outstanding- December 31, 2010		622,350			185,100	$	5.65	$	9.90		449,750		150,000	$	6.22	$	10.24
No activity		--			--	$	--	$	--
Outstanding-September 30, 2011		622,350			185,100	$	5.65	$	9.90		561,933		150,000	$	5.68	$	11.23

The weighted average remaining contractual life of all options outstanding, vested, and expected to vest at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately 4.38 and 5.13 years, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the exercisable options outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately 4.11 and 4.38 years, respectively.

Note 3 – Business Segments

We organize our operations into two reportable business segments within the meaning of FASB ASC 280-10 - Segment Reporting. Our reportable segments are (1) cinema exhibition and (2) real estate. The cinema exhibition segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of multiplex cinemas. The real estate segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of commercial properties. Incident to our real estate operations we have acquired, and continue to hold, raw land in urban and suburban centers in Australia and New Zealand.

-7-

Table of Contents

The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and the management of rental properties including our live theater assets (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended September 30, 2011	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	61,867	$	6,484	$	(1,667	)	$	66,684
Operating expense		50,310		2,496		(1,667	)		51,139
Depreciation & amortization		2,966		1,126		--			4,092
General & administrative expense		649		130		--			779
Segment operating income	$	7,942	$	2,732	$	--		$	10,674
Three months ended September 30, 2010	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	55,303	$	6,695	$	(1,409	)	$	60,589
Operating expense		46,220		2,142		(1,409	)		46,953
Depreciation & amortization		2,526		1,136		--			3,662
General & administrative expense		669		216		--			885
Segment operating income	$	5,888	$	3,201	$	--		$	9,089

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:	2011 Quarter			2010 Quarter
Total segment operating income	$	10,674		$	9,089
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		205			212
General and administrative expense		3,394			3,313
Operating income		7,075			5,564
Interest expense, net		(7,280	)		(3,615	)
Other income		6			20
Net gain on sale of assets		1			--
Income tax expense		39			(885	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		454			293
Loss from discontinued operations		(5	)		1
Net income		290			1,378
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(253	)		(136	)
Net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	37		$	1,242

Nine months ended September 30, 2011	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	173,577	$	19,332	$	(5,000	)	$	187,909
Operating expense		143,352		7,371		(5,000	)		145,723
Depreciation & amortization		8,869		3,633		--			12,502
General & administrative expense		1,930		524		--			2,454
Segment operating income	$	19,426	$	7,804	$	--		$	27,230

Nine months ended September 30, 2010	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	161,582	$	18,247	$	(4,220	)	$	175,609
Operating expense		134,193		6,519		(4,220	)		136,492
Depreciation & amortization		7,635		3,390		--			11,025
Impairment expense		--		2,239		--			2,239
General & administrative expense		1,896		922		--			2,818
Segment operating income	$	17,858	$	5,177	$	--		$	23,035

-8-

Table of Contents

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:	2011 Nine Months			2010 Nine Months
Total segment operating income	$	27,230		$	23,035
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		216			601
General and administrative expense		10,709			10,202
Operating income		16,305			12,232
Interest expense, net		(16,616	)		(10,779	)
Other income (expense)		79			(690	)
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets		(66	)		350
Income tax benefit (expense)		13,177			(13,669	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		1,087			910
Income from discontinued operations		35			31
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		1,656			--
Net income (loss)		15,657			(11,615	)
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(667	)		(505	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	14,990		$	(12,120	)

Note 4 – Operations in Foreign Currency

We have significant assets in Australia and New Zealand. To the extent possible, we conduct our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis. The carrying value of our Australian and New Zealand assets and liabilities fluctuate due to changes in the exchange rates between the US dollar and the functional currency of Australia (Australian dollar) and New Zealand (New Zealand dollar). We have no derivative financial instruments to hedge against the risk of foreign currency exposure.

Presented in the table below are the currency exchange rates for Australia and New Zealand as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	US Dollar
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Australian Dollar	$	0.9744	$	1.0122
New Zealand Dollar	$	0.7675	$	0.7687

Note 5 – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period after giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common shares had been issued. Stock options and non-vested stock awards give rise to potentially dilutive common shares. In accordance with FASB ASC 260-10 - Earnings Per Share, these shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation under the treasury stock method. As noted in the table below, due to the small difference between the basic and diluted weighted average common shares, the basic and the diluted earnings (loss) per share are the same for each of the periods presented. The following is a calculation of earnings (loss) per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):

-9-

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		2011		2010
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	42		$	1,241	$	13,299	$	(12,151	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(5	)		1		1,691		31
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	37		$	1,242	$	14,990	$	(12,120	)

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common share holders:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	--		$	0.05	$	0.58	$	(0.53	)
Earnings from discontinued operations		--			--		0.07		--
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Reading International, Inc. common share holders:	$	--		$	0.05	$	0.65	$	(0.53	)
Weighted average common stock – basic		22,782,534			22,804,313		22,759,488		22,772,166
Weighted average common stock – dilutive		22,979,952			22,850,811		22,956,906		22,772,166

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the weighted average common stock – diluted included 197,418 of stock compensation and in-the-money incremental stock options. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the weighted average common stock – diluted included 46,498 of in-the-money incremental stock options. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded losses from continuing operations; therefore, we excluded 46,498 of in-the-money incremental stock options from the computation of diluted loss per share because they were anti-dilutive in that period. In addition, 726,975 of out-of-the-money stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 760,952 of out-of-the-money stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Note 6 – Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment

Acquisition

On August 25, 2011, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California (the “CalOaks Cinema”) for $4.3 million made up of $3.9 million of cash and a $250,000 holdback note for certain offset charges to the purchase price (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities). Pursuant to ASC 805-10-25, we are in the process of finalizing the purchase accounting for this acquisition.

On May 15, 2011, in conjunction with a potential purchase of the CalOaks cinema, we lent $2.3 million to the owner of the CalOaks cinema in exchange for a 90-day note receivable. The note was securitized by three cinemas’ leases and had an annualized interest of 9.9%. On August 25, 2011, as part of the CalOaks cinema acquisition, the note was paid off.

Disposal

On April 14, 2011, we sold our 66.7% share of the 5-screen Elsternwick Classic cinema located in Melbourne, Australia to our joint venture partner for $1.9 million (AUS$1.8 million) and recognized a gain on sale of a discontinued operation of $1.7 million (AUS$1.6 million).

-10-

Table of Contents

Assets Held for Sale

Lake Taupo Motel – Held For Sale

Having obtained a rezoning of the property for multifamily residential use and completed the renovation of the existing motel into condominium units, we listed this property for sale in the fourth quarter of 2010. The condensed statement of operations of Lake Taupo is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Total revenue	$	78	$	49	$	268	$	209
Total expenses		82		48		233		179

Taringa

While an anticipated sale earlier this year failed to mature, we continue to pursue selling this property. Accordingly, it is held for sale at September 30, 2011.

Property Held For and Under Development

Held For Sale Property Reclassified to Held For Development – Burwood

In May 2010, we announced our intent to sell and began actively marketing our 50.6-acre Burwood development site in suburban Melbourne. At June 30, 2011, we had not yet achieved that aim. Pursuant to ASC 360-10-45, as twelve months had passed since this announcement and we lacked a firm commitment from a buyer, we reclassified the current carrying value of this property of $55.9 million (AUS$52.1 million) from assets held for sale to property held for development on our September 30, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet. Nevertheless, discussions with qualified buyers continue, and it remains our plan to monetize at least the residential portions of this property. Based on recent valuations, we continue to believe that the fair market value of the property less costs to sell is greater than the current carrying value; therefore, no asset impairment loss was recorded at the time of the reclassification.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned property held for and under development summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property Held For and Under Development	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Land	$	80,956	$	31,689
Construction-in-progress (including capitalized interest)		4,835		4,013
Property Held For and Under Development	$	85,791	$	35,702

At the beginning of 2010, we curtailed the development activities of our properties under development and are not currently capitalizing interest expense. As a result, we did not capitalize any interest during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.

-11-

Table of Contents

Property and Equipment

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned investments in property and equipment as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property and equipment	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Land	$	63,925		$	64,845
Building and improvements		143,238			142,077
Leasehold interests		37,400			37,262
Construction-in-progress		406			408
Fixtures and equipment		100,342			99,399
Total cost		345,311			343,991
Less: accumulated depreciation		(132,326	)		(123,741	)
Property and equipment, net	$	212,985		$	220,250

Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $4.0 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $11.7 million and $9.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Entities

Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting except for Rialto Distribution, which is accounted for as a cost method investment, and, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, included the following (dollars in thousands):

	Interest		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Rialto Distribution		33.3%	$	--	$	--
Rialto Cinemas		50.0%		4,491		4,580
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC		25.0%		33		--
Mt. Gravatt Cinema		33.3%		6,118		5,835
Total investments			$	10,642	$	10,415

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded our share of equity earnings (loss) from our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
Rialto Distribution	$	234		$	53	$	346		$	89
Rialto Cinemas		(35	)		23		(87	)		107
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC		--			--		33			--
Mt. Gravatt Cinema		255			217		795			714
Total equity earnings	$	454		$	293	$	1,087		$	910

The 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date. Pursuant to the lease on this property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease.

-12-

Table of Contents

Note 8 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with FASB ASC 350-20-35, Goodwill - Subsequent Measurement and Impairment, we perform an annual impairment review in the fourth quarter of our goodwill and other intangible assets on a reporting unit basis, or earlier if changes in circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. No such circumstances existed during the 2011 Nine Months. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had goodwill consisting of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Cinema			Real Estate		Total
Balance as of December 31, 2010	$	16,311		$	5,224	$	21,535
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(193	)		--		(193	)
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	16,118		$	5,224	$	21,342

We have intangible assets other than goodwill that are subject to amortization, which we amortize over various periods. We amortize our beneficial leases over the lease period, the longest of which is 30 years; our trade name using an accelerated amortization method over its estimated useful life of 45 years; and our other intangible assets over 10 years. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the amortization expense of intangibles totaled $525,000 and $692,000, respectively; and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the amortization expense of intangibles totaled $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The accumulated amortization of intangibles includes $808,000 and $794,000 of the amortization of acquired leases which are recorded in operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

As of September 30, 2011	Beneficial Leases		Trade name		Other Intangible Assets		Total
Gross carrying amount	$	24,164	$	7,220	$	455	$	31,839
Less: Accumulated amortization		10,762		2,413		335		13,510
Total, net	$	13,402	$	4,807	$	120	$	18,329

As of December 31, 2010	Beneficial Leases		Trade name		Other Intangible Assets		Total
Gross carrying amount	$	24,180	$	7,220	$	456	$	31,856
Less: Accumulated amortization		9,435		1,993		272		11,700
Total, net	$	14,745	$	5,227	$	184	$	20,156

-13-

Table of Contents

Note 9 – Prepaid and Other Assets

Prepaid and other assets are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid expenses	$	1,469	$	1,145
Prepaid taxes		840		1,044
Deposits		405		151
Other		1,154		1,196
Total prepaid and other current assets	$	3,868	$	3,536

Other non-current assets
Other non-cinema and non-rental real estate assets	$	1,134	$	1,134
Long-term deposits		251		294
Deferred financing costs, net		3,622		3,830
Interest rate swap at fair value – non-qualifying hedge		--		446
Other receivable		--		6,750
Tenant inducement asset		1,081		1,327
Straight-line rent asset		2,632		2,627
Mortgage notes receivable		837		--
Other		--		128
Total non-current assets	$	9,557	$	16,536

Investment in Notes Receivable

Other Receivable

On June 14, 2011, we received $6.8 million with respect to the principal and interest owed on a note previously received in connection with a settlement agreement. We believe that further amounts are owed under that note, and we have begun litigation to collect such amounts.

Mortgage Notes Receivable

On February 14, 2011, we purchased for $2.8 million mortgage notes secured by certain properties. These mortgage notes were in default on the date of acquisition and were acquired with the intention of acquiring the underlying properties. In February 2011 and in September 2011, we foreclosed on two of these properties valued at $859,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, which are now classified as a part of properties held for development. We are currently pursuing our remedies for the remaining mortgage note, which at September 30, 2011 remained in default. We anticipate that we will ultimately acquire the remaining property.

-14-

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Income Tax

The provision for income taxes is different from the amount computed by applying U.S. statutory rates to consolidated losses before taxes. The significant reason for these differences is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Expected tax provision (benefit)	$	(1	)	$	259		$	635		$	186
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Change in valuation allowance, other		(881	)		(108	)		(15,721	)		41
Foreign income tax provision		59			204			354			497
Foreign withholding tax provision		112			319			326			586
Tax effect of foreign tax rates on current income		(1	)		(151	)		(148	)		(227	)
State and local tax provision		180			129			414			342
Federal tax litigation accrual		493			233			963			12,244
Actual tax provision (benefit)	$	(39	)	$	885		$	(13,177	)	$	13,669

Pursuant to ASC 740-10, a provision should be made for the tax effect of earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are not permanently invested outside the United States. Our intent is that earnings of our foreign subsidiaries not be permanently invested outside the United States.

The Reading Australia consolidated group of subsidiaries generated earnings in the nine months ending September 30, 2011, but had no cumulative earnings available for distribution. No current or cumulative earnings were available for distribution in the Reading New Zealand consolidated group of subsidiaries or in the Puerto Rico subsidiary as of September 30, 2011. We have provided $453,000 in foreign withholding taxes connected with foreign retained earnings.

Deferred income taxes reflect the “temporary differences” between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, adjusted by the relevant tax rate. In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10 – Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”), we record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial performance. ASC 740-10 presumes that a valuation allowance is required when there is substantial negative evidence about realization of deferred tax assets, such as a pattern of losses in recent years, coupled with facts that suggest such losses may continue.

In the period ending June 30, 2011, the Company determined that substantial negative evidence regarding the realizable nature of deferred tax assets continues to exist in the U.S., New Zealand, and Puerto Rico subsidiaries, arising from ongoing pre-tax financial losses. Accordingly, the Company continues to record a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets available in these subsidiaries. After consideration of a number of factors for the Reading Australia group, including its recent history of pretax financial income, its expected future earnings, the increase in market value of its real estate assets, which would cause taxable gain if sold, and having executed in June 2011 a credit facility of over $100 million to resolve potential liquidity issues, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets in Reading Australia will be realized. Accordingly, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Reading Australia reversed $13.8 million of the valuation allowance previously recorded against its net deferred tax, which mainly reflects the loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income in Australia.

We have accrued $28.0 million in income tax liabilities as of September 30, 2011, of which $25.8 million has been classified as income taxes payable and $2.3 million have been classified as non-current tax liabilities. As part of current tax liabilities, we have accrued $20.3 in connection with the negotiated Tax Court judgment, dated January 6, 2011, implementing our agreement with the IRS as to the final disposition of the 1996 tax litigation matter discussed in Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies below. We believe these amounts represent an adequate provision for our income tax exposures, including income tax contingencies related to foreign withholding taxes described in Note 12 – Other Liabilities.

In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10-25 – Income Taxes - Uncertain Tax Positions (“ASC 740-10-25”), we record interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of income tax expense.

-15-

Table of Contents

The following table is a summary of the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, for the periods ending September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011			Year Ended December 31, 2010			Year Ended December 31, 2009
Unrecognized tax benefits – gross beginning balance	$	8,058		$	11,412		$	11,271
Gross increases – prior period tax provisions		199			--			92
Gross decreases – prior period tax positions		(6,035	)		--			--
Gross increases – current period tax positions		--			405			219
Settlements		--			(3,189	)		--
Statute of limitations lapse		--			(570	)		(170	)
Unrecognized tax benefits – gross ending balance	$	2,222		$	8,058		$	11,412

At December 31, 2010, the total balance of the gross unrecognized tax benefit was $20.6 million (of which approximately $12.6 million represents interest). Of this $20.6 million, approximately $19.5 million would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. For the nine months ending September 30, 2011 we recorded a reduction to our gross unrecognized tax benefits of $6.0 million and a decrease to tax interest of $10.5 million, reflecting the negotiated Tax Court judgment referenced above, which is a liability no longer in the nature of a reserve for uncertain positions. The net tax balance is approximately $2.2 million, of which $1.1 million would impact the effective rate if recognized.

It is difficult to predict the timing and resolution of uncertain tax positions. Based upon the Company’s assessment of many factors, including past experience and judgments about future events, it is probable that within the next 12 months the reserve for uncertain tax positions will increase within a range of $0.6 million to $0.9 million. The reasons for such changes include but are not limited to tax positions expected to be taken during the next twelve months, reevaluation of current uncertain tax positions, expiring statutes of limitations, and interest related to the ”Tax Audit/Litigation” matter discussed below.

Our company and subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax, income tax in various U.S. states, and income tax in Australia, New Zealand, and Puerto Rico.

Generally, changes to our federal and most state income tax returns for the calendar year 2007 and earlier are barred by statutes of limitations. Certain domestic subsidiaries filed federal and state tax returns for periods before these entities became consolidated with us. These subsidiaries were examined by the IRS for the years 1996 to 1999 and significant tax deficiencies were assessed for those years. Those deficiencies have been settled, as discussed in “Tax Audit/Litigation,” Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies. Our income tax returns of Australia filed since inception in 1995 are generally open for examination because of operating losses. The income tax returns filed in New Zealand and Puerto Rico for calendar year 2006 and afterward generally remain open for examination as of September 30, 2011.

-16-

Table of Contents

Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities)

Notes payable and subordinated debt (trust preferred securities) are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Name of Note Payable or Security	September 30, 2011 Interest Rate		December 31, 2010 Interest Rate		Maturity Date	September 30, 2011 Balance		December 31, 2010 Balance
BOSI Australian Corporate Credit Facility		--		6.31%	June 30, 2011	$	--	$	101,726
NAB Australian Corporate Term Loan		7.83%		--	June 30, 2014		85,991		--
NAB Australian Corporate Revolver		7.83%		--	June 30, 2014		--		--
Australian Shopping Center Loans		--		--	2011-2014		487		633
New Zealand Corporate Credit Facility		4.35%		4.75%	March 31, 2012		21,490		20,370
Trust Preferred Securities		9.22%		9.22%	April 30, 2027		27,913		27,913
US Cinemas 1, 2, 3 Term Loan		6.73%		6.73%	July 1, 2012		15,000		15,000
US GE Capital Term Loan		5.50%		5.50%	December 1, 2015		32,188		37,500
US Liberty Theaters Term Loans		6.20%		6.20%	April 1, 2013		6,620		6,727
US Nationwide Loan 1		8.50%		8.50%	February 21, 2013		598		730
US Nationwide Loan 2		--		8.50%	February 21, 2011		--		1,839
US Sanborn Note		7.00%		--	January 31, 2012		250		--
US Sutton Hill Capital Note – Related Party		8.25%		8.25%	December 31, 2013		9,000		9,000
US Union Square Term Loan – Sun Life		5.92%		5.92%	May 1, 2015		7,227		7,383
Total						$	206,764	$	228,821

NAB Australian Corporate Term Loan

On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with BOS International (“BOSI”) with a new credit facility from National Australia Bank (“NAB”) of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million). NAB provided us term debt of $94.7 million (AUS$90.0 million) and $9.5 million (AUS$9.0 million) in line of credit which we used combined with our cash of $1.6 million (AUS$1.5 million) to pay down our $105.8 million (AUS$100.5 million) of outstanding BOSI debt.

The new three-tiered credit facility from NAB (the “NAB Credit Facility”) has a term of three years, due and payable June 30, 2014, and comprises a $87.7 million (AUS$90.0 million) term loan; a $9.7 million (AUS$10.0 million) revolving facility for which we do not have a balance at September 30, 2011; and a $4.9 million (AUS$5.0 million) guarantee facility. This loan to Reading Entertainment Australia commenced on June 24, 2011 with an interest rate of between 2.90% and 2.15% above the BBSY bid rate. The collateral pledged as security under the NAB Credit Facility is equivalent to that pledged to secure the expired BOSI Facility. The NAB Credit Facility requires annual principal payments of between $6.8 million (AUS$7.0 million) and $8.8 million (AUS$9.0 million) which, it is anticipated, will be paid from Reading Entertainment Australia operating cash flows. The covenants of the NAB Credit Facility include a fixed charge coverage ratio, a debt service cover ratio, an operating leverage ratio, a loan to value ratio, and other financial covenants. Additionally, the NAB Credit Facility allows us to transfer only $3.9 million (AUS$4.0 million) per year outside of Australia. On August 2, 2011, we paid down our NAB revolver by $9.7 million (AUS$9.0 million) resulting in a zero balance on that date.

In conjunction with this NAB Credit Facility, we entered into a five-year interest swap agreement which swaps 100% of our $86.0 million (AUS$88.3 million) variable rate term loan (decreasing in line with scheduled principal repayments) based on BBSY, for a 5.50% fixed rate. For further information regarding our swap agreements, see Note 17 – Derivative Instruments.

US Nationwide Notes 1 & 2

Pursuant to the terms of the notes, on February 21, 2011, we paid off our Nationwide Loan 2 of $1.5 million with its $359,000 of accrued interest and paid off the accrued interest of $134,000 included in the Nationwide Loan 1 balance.

US Sanborn Note

On August 25, 2011, we issued a $250,000 note in partial payment of the purchase price for the CalOaks Cinema in Murrieta, California. Under the applicable purchase and sale agreement and the terms of the note, our liability under this note is subject to reduction in the event that post-closing adjustments result in a reduction of the purchase price paid for that cinema. The note carries an interest rate of 7.00% and a maturity date of January 31, 2012 (see Note 6 – Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment).

-17-

Table of Contents

Bank of America Line of Credit

On July 21, 2011, we used $2.5 million of our $3.0 million line of credit with Bank of America for a letter of credit associated with the lease of our under construction new 8-screen Angelika Film Center cinema in the Mosaic District in the Greater Washington D.C. area.

Note 12 – Other Liabilities

Other liabilities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Current liabilities
Security deposit payable	$	135	$	141

Other liabilities
Foreign withholding taxes	$	5,944	$	5,944
Straight-line rent liability		7,904		7,559
Capital lease liability		5,719		5,637
Environmental reserve		1,656		1,656
Accrued pension		4,695		4,406
Interest rate swap – non-qualifying hedge		4,301		181
Acquired leases		2,901		3,264
Other payable		2,246		2,603
Other		691		945
Other liabilities	$	36,057	$	32,195

Included in our other liabilities are accrued pension costs of $4.7 million at September 30, 2011. The benefits of our pension plans are fully vested, and, as such, no service costs were recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Our pension plans are unfunded; therefore, the actuarial assumptions do not include an estimate for expected return on plan assets. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $99,000 and $289,000, respectively, of interest cost and $82,000 and $246,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized $76,000 and $228,000, respectively, of interest cost and $76,000 and $228,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost.

Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

Unconsolidated Debt

Total debt of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities was $652,000 and $653,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Our share of unconsolidated debt, based on our ownership percentage, was $217,000 and $218,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. This debt is guaranteed by one of our subsidiaries to the extent of our ownership percentage.

-18-

Table of Contents

U.S. Federal Tax Settlement

As indicated in our 2010 Annual Report, our subsidiary, Craig Corporation (“Craig”), and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in July 2010, settled the proposed assessment by the IRS against Craig for the 1996 tax year. The original assessment of $20.1 million plus interest was settled for $5.4 million plus interest, as reflected in the final judgment of the Tax Court dated January 6, 2011. On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”) agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000 (see Note 20 – Subsequent Events). We anticipate federal and state tax deductions will be available for interest paid to the IRS and to state tax agencies, and that a federal deduction will be available for taxes paid to state tax agencies.

The impact of the settlement upon our liability for state taxes remains uncertain but if the adjustment to income agreed with the IRS were reflected on state returns, it would cause a state tax obligation of approximately $1.4 million plus interest and penalty, if any. As of September 30, 2011, no deficiency has been asserted by the State of California, and we have made no final decision as to the course of action to be followed if a deficiency were to be asserted.

Note 14 – Noncontrolling interests

Noncontrolling interests are composed of the following enterprises:

·	50% membership interest in Angelika Film Centers LLC (“AFC LLC”) owned by a subsidiary of iDNA, Inc.;

·	25% noncontrolling interest in Australia Country Cinemas Pty Ltd (“ACC”) owned by Panorama Cinemas for the 21st Century Pty Ltd.; and

·	25% noncontrolling interest in the Sutton Hill Properties, LLC owned by SHC.

The components of noncontrolling interests are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
AFC LLC	$	772		$	681
Australia Country Cinemas		297			162
Elsternwick unincorporated joint venture		--			176
Sutton Hill Properties		(194	)		(167	)
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries	$	875		$	852

The components of income attributable to noncontrolling interests are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
AFC LLC	$	192		$	116		$	566		$	461
Australia Country Cinemas		129			83			265			201
Elsternwick Unincorporated Joint Venture		--			(3	)		25			41
Sutton Hill Properties		(68	)		(60	)		(189	)		(198	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	$	253		$	136		$	667		$	505

Elsternwick Sale

-19-

Table of Contents

A summary of the changes in controlling and noncontrolling stockholders’ equity is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Reading International, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Equity at – January 1, 2011	$	111,787		$	852		$	112,639
Net income		14,990			667			15,657
Increase in additional paid in capital		142			163			305
Treasury stock purchased		(328	)		--			(328	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		--			(655	)		(655	)
Cinema sale to noncontrolling shareholder		--			(147	)		(147	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(6,570	)		(5	)		(6,575	)
Equity at – September 30, 2011	$	120,021		$	875		$	120,896

	Reading International, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Stockholders’ Equity			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Equity at – January 1, 2010	$	108,889		$	1,374		$	110,263
Net income (loss)		(12,120	)		505			(11,615	)
Decrease in additional paid in capital		(581	)		--			(581	)
Treasury stock purchased		(251	)		--			(251	)
Contributions to noncontrolling interests		--			200			200
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		--			(1,028	)		(1,028	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7,808			30			7,838
Equity at – September 30, 2010	$	103,745		$	1,081		$	104,826

Note 15 – Common Stock

Common Stock Issuance

For the stock options exercised during 2010, we issued for cash to employees of the corporation under our employee stock option plan 90,000 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.76 per share.

Treasury Stock Purchases

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we purchased 72,300 and 62,375, respectively, of Class A Nonvoting shares on the open market for $328,000 and $251,000, respectively.

-20-

Table of Contents

Note 16 – Comprehensive Income (Loss)

U.S. GAAP requires that the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and/or losses on securities that are available-for-sale (“AFS”) be classified as comprehensive income (loss). The following table sets forth our comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income (loss)	$	290		$	1,378		$	15,657		$	(11,615	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		(18,218	)		16,538			(6,782	)		8,131
Amortization of pension prior service costs		82			76			246			228
Realized gain (loss) on available for sale investments		15			--			(9	)		--
Unrealized loss on available for sale investments		(138	)		(263	)		(30	)		(520	)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(17,969	)		17,729			9,082			(3,776	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(253	)		(136	)		(667	)		(505	)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29			(51	)		5			(30	)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc.	$	(18,193	)	$	17,542		$	8,420		$	(4,311	)

The above foreign currency translation loss of $18.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 is as a result of the Australia to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 1.0732 to 0.9744 and the New Zealand to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 0.8284 to 0.7675 during the 2011 Quarter. Additionally, the above foreign currency translation loss of $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as a result of the Australia to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 1.0122 to 0.9744 and the New Zealand to U.S. currency rates decreasing from 0.7687 to 0.7675 during the 2011 Nine Months.

Note 17 – Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to interest rate changes from our outstanding floating rate borrowings. We manage our fixed to floating rate debt mix to mitigate the impact of adverse changes in interest rates on earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedging contracts, which effectively convert a portion of our variable rate debt to a fixed rate over the term of the interest rate swap. In the case of our Australian borrowings, we are presently required to swap no less than 75% of our drawdowns under our Australian Corporate Credit Facility into fixed interest rate obligations. In conjunction with this NAB Credit Facility, we entered into a five-year interest swap agreement, which swaps 100% of our variable rate loan based on BBSY for a 5.50% fixed rate loan. Under our GE Capital Term Loan, we are required to swap no less than 50% of our variable rate drawdowns for the first three years of the loan agreement. We elected to swap 100% of the original loan balance on the GE Capital Term Loan and have contracted for balance step-downs that correspond with the loan’s principal payments through December 31, 2013.

The following table sets forth the terms of our interest rate swap derivative instruments at September 30, 2011:

Type of Instrument	Notional Amount		Pay Fixed Rate		Receive Variable Rate		Maturity Date
Interest rate swap	$	34,688,000		1.340%		0.370%	December 31, 2013
Interest rate swap	$	85,991,000		5.500%		4.930%	June 30, 2016

-21-

Table of Contents

In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, Subsequent Valuation of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Instruments (“FASB ASC 815-10-35”), we marked our interest rate swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet resulting in an increase in interest expense of $2.9 million and $4.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and a $308,000 and $189,000 decrease in interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap of $4.3 million as an other long-term liability. At December 31, 2010, we recorded the fair market value of an interest rate swap and a cap of $446,000 as other long-term assets and an interest rate swap of $181,000 as an other long-term liability. In accordance with FASB ASC 815-10-35, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as financial reporting hedges.

Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We measure the following items at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820-20, Fair Value of Financial Instruments (dollars in thousands):

			Book Value				Fair Value
Financial Instrument	Level		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents		1	$	26,757	$	34,568	$	26,757	$	34,568
Investment in marketable securities		1	$	2,731	$	2,985	$	2,731	$	2,985
Interest rate swap & cap assets		2	$	--	$	446	$	--	$	446
Interest rate swap liability		2	$	4,301	$	181	$	4,301	$	181

ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The statement requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

·	Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

·	Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

·	Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data (were not used to value any of our assets requiring recurring measurements of fair value).

We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair values of the assets and liabilities:

Level 1 Fair Value Measurements – are based on market quotes of our marketable securities.

Level 2 Fair Value Measurements –

Interest Rate Swaps – The fair value of interest rate swaps and cap are estimated based on market data and quotes from counter parties to the agreements which are corroborated by market data.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – we do not have any assets or liabilities that fall into this category for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Impaired Property - For assets measured on a non-recurring basis, such as real estate assets that are required to be recorded at fair value as a result of an impairment, our estimates of fair value are based on management’s best estimate derived from evaluating market sales data for comparable properties developed by a third party appraiser and arriving at management’s estimate of fair value based on such comparable data primarily based on properties with similar characteristics.

-22-

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we held certain items that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included cash equivalents, available for sale securities, and interest rate derivative contracts. Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid, income-producing investments, all of which have maturities of 90 days or less. Our available-for-sale securities primarily consist of investments associated with the ownership of marketable securities in Australia. Derivative instruments are related to our economic hedge of interest rates.

The fair values of the interest rate swap agreements are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future cash payments and cash receipts on the pay and receive legs of the interest swap agreements that have the net effect of swapping the estimated variable rate note payment stream for a fixed rate payment stream over the period of the swap. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the interest rate swap and cap agreements are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820-10, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by our counterparties and us. However, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation and determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The nature of our interest rate swap derivative instruments is described in Note 17 – Derivative Instruments.

We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented and believe we have obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative contracts we hold. Additionally, there were no transfers of assets and liabilities between levels 1, 2, or 3 during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value

The following table sets forth the carrying value and the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	Book Value				Fair Value
Financial Instrument	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Notes payable	$	169,851	$	191,908	$	168,256	$	173,129
Notes payable to related party	$	9,000	$	9,000	$	N/A	$	N/A
Subordinated debt (trust preferred securities)	$	27,913	$	27,913	$	21,149	$	18,241

The fair value of notes payable to related party cannot be determined due to the related party nature of the terms of the notes payable.

We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage notes payable, our unsecured notes payable, trust preferred securities, and other debt instruments by performing discounted cash flow analyses using an appropriate market discount rate. We calculated the market discount rate by obtaining period-end treasury rates for fixed-rate debt, or LIBOR rates for variable-rate debt, for maturities that correspond to the maturities of our debt, adding appropriate credit spreads derived from information obtained from third-party financial institutions. These credit spreads take into account factors such as our credit standing, the maturity of the debt, whether the debt is secured or unsecured, and the loan-to-value ratios of the debt.

-23-

Table of Contents

Note 19 – Casualty Losses

Our 8-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand, was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date. We have earthquake and lost profits insurance on that facility and we are currently awaiting payment for our submitted claim. We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011.

Additionally, the 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date. Pursuant to the lease on the property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease.

Note 20 – Subsequent Events

Tax Settlement Payment Agreement

On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”) agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000.

-24-

Table of Contents

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are an internationally diversified company principally focused on the development, ownership, and operation of entertainment and real property assets in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Our concentration in Australia and New Zealand assets has served us well in times of falling US Dollar values, and our strategy in focusing on hard assets is once again beginning to show strength, particularly as commercial real estate values in Manhattan have firmed.

Currently, we operate in two business segments:

·	cinema exhibition, through our 57 multiplex cinemas; and

·	real estate, including real estate development and the rental of retail, commercial and live theater assets.

We believe that these two business segments can complement one another, as we can use the comparatively consistent cash flows generated by our cinema operations to fund the front-end cash demands of our real estate development business.

We manage our worldwide cinema exhibition businesses under various different brands:

·	in the US, under the Reading, Angelika Film Center, Consolidated Amusements, and City Cinemas brands;

·	in Australia, under the Reading brand; and

·	in New Zealand, under the Reading and Rialto brands.

We believe cinema exhibition to be a business that will likely continue to generate relatively consistent cash flows in the years ahead. We base this on our belief that people will continue to spend some reasonable portion of their entertainment dollar on entertainment outside of the home and that, when compared to other forms of outside the home entertainment; movies continue to be a popular and competitively priced option. While we see the cinema exhibition as a mature industry, we anticipate that our cinema operations will continue as our main source of cash flow and will support our real estate oriented activities and may from time to time add cinemas. In this regard, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California and we anticipate opening a new “Angelika” 8-screen cinema in a new retail development currently under construction in Merrifield, Virginia in late 2012.

In short, while we do have operating company attributes, we see ourselves principally as a hard asset company and intend to add to shareholder value by building the value of our portfolio of tangible assets.

In addition, we may from time to time identify opportunities to expand our existing businesses and asset base, or to otherwise profit, through the acquisition of interests in other publicly traded companies, both in the United States and in the overseas jurisdictions in which we do business. We may also take positions in private companies in addition to our investments in various private cinema joint ventures.

At September 30, 2011, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 433 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 3 cinemas with 29 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens. One of these cinemas, our 8-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand, was damaged as a result of the devastating earthquake suffered by that city on February 22, 2011, and has been closed since that date and is currently planned to reopen on November 17, 2011. We have earthquake and lost profits insurance on that facility and we are currently awaiting payment for our submitted claim. Additionally, the 3-screen complex in Christchurch, New Zealand owned by our Rialto Cinemas joint venture entity (“Rialto Cinemas”), was also damaged in the February 2011 earthquake, and has been closed since that date. Pursuant to the lease on the property, in May 2011, Rialto Cinemas gave notice to the landlord that Rialto Cinemas would be terminating the cinema lease. We have adjusted our cinema screen count to reflect the permanent closure of this cinema.

-25-

Table of Contents

As mentioned above, we continue to consider opportunities to expand our cinema operations, while at the same time continuing to cull those cinema assets which are underperforming or have unacceptable risk profiles on a go forward basis. During May and September 2010, we terminated the leases on two underperforming cinemas. On April 14, 2011, we sold to our joint venture partner our 66.7% interest in the Elsternwick cinema for $1.9 million (AUS$1.8 million) and recognized a gain on sale of a discontinued operation of $1.7 million (AUS$1.6 million).

Although we have curtailed our real estate development activities, we remain opportunistic in our acquisitions of both cinema and real estate assets. Our business plan going forward is to continue the build-out of our existing development properties and to seek out additional, profitable real estate development opportunities while continuing to use and judiciously expand our presence in the cinema exhibition business by identifying, developing, and acquiring cinema properties when and where appropriate. In addition, we will continue to investigate potential synergistic acquisitions that may not readily fall into either of our two currently identified segments.

We are currently considering the potential sale of certain of our real estate assets. We have taken steps to sell our Lake Taupo and Taringa Properties that are both held for sale at September 30, 2011. Also, we continue to consider various methods to monetize all or at least the residential portion of our Burwood development site even though it cannot be classified as a property held for sale pursuant to ASC 360-10-45 (see Note 6 - Acquisitions, Property Sold, Property Held for Sale, Property Held For and Under Development, and Property and Equipment).

We continue to acquire, to dispose of, or to reposition our real estate assets in accordance with our business plan. For the 2011 Quarter, we did not have any real estate acquisitions.

Results of Operations

At September 30, 2011, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 433 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 3 cinemas with 29 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens. In real estate during the period, we (i) owned and operated four ETRC’s that we developed in Australia and New Zealand, (ii) owned the fee interests in four developed commercial properties in Manhattan and Chicago improved with live theaters comprising seven stages and ancillary retail and commercial space, (iii) owned the fee interests underlying one of our Manhattan cinemas, and (iv) held for development an additional seven parcels aggregating approximately 129 acres located principally in urbanized areas of Australia and New Zealand.

Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and the management of rental properties, including our live theater assets. Our year-to-year results of operations were principally impacted by the fluctuation in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars vis-à-vis the US dollar resulting in an increase in results of operations for our foreign operations for 2011 compared to 2010.

-26-

Table of Contents

The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business segments for the three (“2011 Quarter”) and nine (“2011 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2011 and the three (“2010 Quarter”) and nine (“2010 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended September 30, 2011	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	61,867	$	6,484	$	(1,667	)	$	66,684
Operating expense		50,310		2,496		(1,667	)		51,139
Depreciation & amortization		2,966		1,126		--			4,092
General & administrative expense		649		130		--			779
Segment operating income	$	7,942	$	2,732	$	--		$	10,674
Three months ended September 30, 2010	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	55,303	$	6,695	$	(1,409	)	$	60,589
Operating expense		46,220		2,142		(1,409	)		46,953
Depreciation & amortization		2,526		1,136		--			3,662
General & administrative expense		669		216		--			885
Segment operating income	$	5,888	$	3,201	$	--		$	9,089

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:	2011 Quarter			2010 Quarter
Total segment operating income	$	10,674		$	9,089
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		205			212
General and administrative expense		3,394			3,313
Operating income		7,075			5,564
Interest expense, net		(7,280	)		(3,615	)
Other income		6			20
Net gain on sale of assets		1			--
Income tax expense		39			(885	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		454			293
Loss from discontinued operations		(5	)		1
Net income		290			1,378
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(253	)		(136	)
Net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	37		$	1,242

Nine months ended September 30, 2011	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	173,577	$	19,332	$	(5,000	)	$	187,909
Operating expense		143,352		7,371		(5,000	)		145,723
Depreciation & amortization		8,869		3,633		--			12,502
General & administrative expense		1,930		524		--			2,454
Segment operating income	$	19,426	$	7,804	$	--		$	27,230

-27-

Table of Contents

Nine months ended September 30, 2010	Cinema Exhibition		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	161,582	$	18,247	$	(4,220	)	$	175,609
Operating expense		134,193		6,519		(4,220	)		136,492
Depreciation & amortization		7,635		3,390		--			11,025
Impairment expense		--		2,239		--			2,239
General & administrative expense		1,896		922		--			2,818
Segment operating income	$	17,858	$	5,177	$	--		$	23,035

Reconciliation to net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. shareholders:	2011 Nine Months			2010 Nine Months
Total segment operating income	$	27,230		$	23,035
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		216			601
General and administrative expense		10,709			10,202
Operating income		16,305			12,232
Interest expense, net		(16,616	)		(10,779	)
Other income (expense)		79			(690	)
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets		(66	)		350
Income tax benefit (expense)		13,177			(13,669	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		1,087			910
Income from discontinued operations		35			31
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		1,656			--
Net income (loss)		15,657			(11,615	)
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest		(667	)		(505	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders	$	14,990		$	(12,120	)

Cinema Exhibition Segment

Included in the cinema exhibition segment above is revenue and expense from the operations of 52 cinema complexes with 433 screens during the 2011 Quarter and 51 cinema complexes with 413 screens during the 2010 Quarter and management fee income from 2 cinemas with 9 screens in both years. The following tables detail our cinema exhibition segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	19,103	$	21,101	$	3,459	$	43,663
Concessions revenue		7,400		6,527		950		14,877
Advertising and other revenues		1,509		1,606		212		3,327
Total revenues		28,012		29,234		4,621		61,867

Cinema costs		23,159		20,677		3,658		47,494
Concession costs		1,198		1,366		252		2,816
Total operating expense		24,357		22,043		3,910		50,310

Depreciation and amortization		1,581		1,101		284		2,966
General & administrative expense		481		168		--		649
Segment operating income	$	1,593	$	5,922	$	427	$	7,942

-28-

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	19,068	$	16,455	$	4,148	$	39,671
Concessions revenue		7,039		4,946		1,052		13,037
Advertising and other revenues		1,308		1,032		255		2,595
Total revenues		27,415		22,433		5,455		55,303

Cinema costs		23,117		16,767		3,973		43,857
Concession costs		1,090		1,037		236		2,363
Total operating expense		24,207		17,804		4,209		46,220

Depreciation and amortization		1,599		669		258		2,526
General & administrative expense		491		178		--		669
Segment operating income	$	1,118	$	3,782	$	988	$	5,888

Cinema revenue increased for the 2011 Quarter by $6.6 million or 11.9% compared to the same period in 2010. The 2011 Quarter increase was primarily related to increases in revenue from our U.S. and Australian cinema operations of $597,000 and $6.8 million, respectively. These revenue increases were primarily related to an increase in box office attendance of 53,000 and 67,000, respectively, an increase in ticket prices in Australia, and an increase in the value of the Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below) compared to the same period last year. Our New Zealand cinema revenue decreased by $834,000 primarily related to a 142,000 decrease in attendance which was exacerbated by the closure of our Christchurch New Zealand cinema since the February 22, 2011 earthquake in that city. We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011. Also, we anticipate that some of this loss will be made up by insurance proceeds. We anticipate this cinema will reopen in November 2011. This revenue decrease was somewhat offset by an increase in the value of the New Zealand dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).

·	Operating expense increased for the 2011 Quarter by $4.1 million or 8.8% compared to the same period in 2010. This increase followed the increased revenues noted above. Overall, our operating expense as a percent of gross revenue decreased from 83.6% to 81.3%.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2011 Quarter by $440,000 or 17.4% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to certain recently purchased 3D equipment being depreciated in the 2011 Quarter and the inclusion of the Charlestown cinema as an operating location since October 2010.

·	General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $20,000 or 3.0% compared to the same period in 2010.

·	For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.9% and 15.7%, respectively, since the 2010 Quarter, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.

·	Because of the above, the cinema exhibition segment income increased for the 2011 Quarter by $2.1 million compared to the same period in 2010, a 34.9% increase.

-29-

Table of Contents

The following tables detail our cinema exhibition segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	54,870	$	57,904	$	9,724	$	122,498
Concessions revenue		21,182		18,147		2,595		41,924
Advertising and other revenues		4,032		4,578		545		9,155
Total revenues		80,084		80,629		12,864		173,577

Cinema costs		66,728		58,408		10,317		135,453
Concession costs		3,365		3,875		659		7,899
Total operating expense		70,093		62,283		10,976		143,352

Depreciation and amortization		4,807		3,205		857		8,869
General & administrative expense		1,488		442		--		1,930
Segment operating income	$	3,696	$	14,699	$	1,031	$	19,426

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	55,981	$	47,059	$	12,520	$	115,560
Concessions revenue		21,062		14,032		3,073		38,167
Advertising and other revenues		3,860		3,254		741		7,855
Total revenues		80,903		64,345		16,334		161,582

Cinema costs		67,789		47,482		11,922		127,193
Concession costs		3,275		3,012		713		7,000
Total operating expense		71,064		50,494		12,635		134,193

Depreciation and amortization		4,805		2,063		767		7,635
General & administrative expense		1,436		460		--		1,896
Segment operating income	$	3,598	$	11,328	$	2,932	$	17,858

Cinema revenue increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $12.0 million or 7.4% compared to the same period in 2010. The 2011 Nine Months increase was primary related to a $16.3 million increase in revenue from our Australian cinema operations primarily related to a combined increase in admissions, ticket prices, and the value of the Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar (see below). This increase from our Australian operations was offset by decreases in revenue from our U.S. and New Zealand cinema operations of $819,000 and $3.5 million, respectively, primarily related to decreases in cinema admissions of 101,000 and 445,000, respectively. The poor attendance in New Zealand was exacerbated by the closure of our Christchurch New Zealand cinema since the February 22, 2011 earthquake in that city. We currently plan to reopen this cinema on November 17, 2011. Also, we anticipate that some of this loss will be made up by insurance proceeds. The decreased revenue from New Zealand was somewhat offset by an increase in the value of New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).

-30-

Table of Contents

Operating expense increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $9.2 million or 6.8% compared to the same period in 2010. This increase followed the increases and decreases in revenues for the three countries noted above and was affected by an increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below). Overall, our operating expense as a percent of gross revenue decreased from 83.0% to 82.6%.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.2 million or 16.2% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to certain recently purchased 3D equipment being depreciated in the 2011 Nine Months and the inclusion of the Charlestown cinema as an operating location since October 2010.

·	General and administrative costs increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $34,000 or 1.8% compared to the same period in 2010.

·	For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.8% and 12.2%, respectively, since the 2010 Nine Months, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.

·	Because of the above, the cinema exhibition segment income increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.6 million compared to the same period in 2010, an 8.8% increase.

Real Estate Segment

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011	United States			Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theater rental and ancillary income	$	678		$	--	$	--	$	678
Property rental income		398			3,569		1,839		5,806
Total revenues		1,076			3,569		1,839		6,484

Live theater costs		471			--		--		471
Property rental cost		101			1,477		447		2,025
Total operating expense		572			1,477		447		2,496

Depreciation and amortization		82			817		227		1,126
General & administrative expense		(7	)		119		18		130
Segment operating income	$	429		$	1,156	$	1,147	$	2,732

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theater rental and ancillary income	$	764	$	--	$	--	$	764
Property rental income		440		3,880		1,611		5,931
Total revenues		1,204		3,880		1,611		6,695

Live theater costs		513		--		--		513
Property rental cost		101		1,147		381		1,629
Total operating expense		614		1,147		381		2,142

Depreciation and amortization		80		692		364		1,136
General & administrative expense		2		211		3		216
Segment operating income	$	508	$	1,830	$	863	$	3,201

-31-

Table of Contents

Real estate revenue decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $211,000 or 3.2% compared to the same period in 2010. Real estate revenue decreased from lower U.S. property revenues primarily due to a drop in live theater revenue in 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Additionally, revenue from our Australian properties decreased primarily due to a nonrecurring adjustment to the amortization of a tenant improvement and straight-line rent during the 2010 Quarter. These decreases in revenue were offset by a year over year increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).

Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2011 Quarter by $354,000 or 16.5% compared to the same period in 2010. This increase generally followed a normal increase in real estate costs for Australia and New Zealand coupled with an increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).

Depreciation and amortization expense for the real estate segment decreased by $10,000 or 0.9% for the 2011 Quarter compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to a correction to New Zealand depreciation expense classification offset by the aforementioned impact of currency exchange rates (see below).

·	General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $86,000 or 39.8% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to a 2010 accrual for allowance for doubtful accounts in Australia not repeated in 2011.

·	For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates increased by 15.9% and 15.7%, respectively, since the 2010 Quarter, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.

·	As a result of the above, real estate segment income decreased for the 2011 Quarter by $469,000 or 14.7% compared to the same period in 2010.

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theater rental and ancillary income	$	2,229	$	--	$	--	$	2,229
Property rental income		1,306		10,509		5,288		17,103
Total revenues		3,535		10,509		5,288		19,332

Live theater costs		1,424		--		--		1,424
Property rental cost		331		4,391		1,225		5,947
Total operating expense		1,755		4,391		1,225		7,371

Depreciation and amortization		245		2,426		962		3,633
General & administrative expense		22		446		56		524
Segment operating income	$	1,513	$	3,246	$	3,045	$	7,804

-32-

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theater rental and ancillary income	$	2,239	$	--	$	--	$	2,239
Property rental income		1,314		10,071		4,623		16,008
Total revenues		3,553		10,071		4,623		18,247

Live theater costs		1,516		--		--		1,516
Property rental cost		341		3,556		1,106		5,003
Total operating expense		1,857		3,556		1,106		6,519

Depreciation and amortization		240		2,056		1,094		3,390
Loss on transfer of real estate held for sale to continuing operations		--		2,239		--		2,239
General & administrative expense		3		893		26		922
Segment operating income	$	1,453	$	1,327	$	2,397	$	5,177

Real estate revenue increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $1.1 million or 5.9% compared to the same period in 2010. Real estate revenue increased from our Australian and New Zealand properties primarily due to a year over year increase in the value of the Australian and New Zealand dollars compared to the U.S. dollar (see below).

·	Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $852,000 or 13.1% compared to the same period in 2010. This increase generally followed the increased revenues noted above.

·	Depreciation and amortization expense for the real estate segment increased by $243,000 or 7.2% for the 2011 Nine Months compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to the aforementioned impact of currency exchange rates (see below).

·	We recorded a $2.2 million impairment charge related to our Taringa real estate property during the second quarter of 2010 primarily associated with the write-off of development costs of the project.

·	General and administrative costs decreased for the 2011 Nine Months by $398,000 or 43.2% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to 2010 litigation costs for the Mackie case in Australia not repeated in 2011.

·	For our statement of operations, the Australian and New Zealand nine month average exchange rates increased by 15.8% and 12.2%, respectively, since the 2010 Nine Months, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement.

·	As a result of the above, real estate segment income increased for the 2011 Nine Months by $2.6 million or 50.7% compared to the same period in 2010 primarily related to the above mentioned impairment charge for our Taringa property in 2010.

-33-

Table of Contents

Corporate

Quarterly Results

General and administrative expense increased by $81,000 in the 2011 Quarter compared to the 2010 Quarter, primarily related to one-time severance and temporarily duplicated labor costs associated with our transfer of our accounting functions from the U.S. and Australia to New Zealand; offset by, a decrease in legal and consulting fees primarily associated with our federal tax litigation, which was settled during July 2010.

Net interest expense increased by $3.7 million for the 2011 Quarter compared to the 2010 Quarter. The increase in interest expense during the 2011 Quarter was primarily related to an increase in interest expense from the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps in 2011 over that of the same period in 2010.

For the 2011 Quarter, we recorded an income tax benefit of $39,000 compared to an $885,000 income tax expense primarily associated with our ongoing estimate of the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets in our Reading Australia operations.

For the 2011 Quarter, we recorded an increase in our equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities of $161,000 primarily related to partnership distributions from our Rialto Distributions investment.

Nine Months Results

General and administrative expense increased by $507,000 in the 2011 Nine Months compared to the 2010 Nine Months, primarily related to one-time severance and temporarily duplicated labor costs associated with our transfer of our accounting functions from the U.S. and Australia to New Zealand; offset by, a decrease in legal and consulting fees primarily associated with our federal tax litigation, which was settled during July 2010.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $385,000 for the 2011 Nine Months primarily due to a correction to New Zealand depreciation expense classification.

Net interest expense increased by $5.8 million for the 2011 Nine Months compared to the 2010 Nine Months. The increase in interest expense during the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to an increase in interest expense from the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps in 2011 over that of the same period in 2010.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an other income of $79,000 compared to an other expense of $690,000 for the 2010 Nine Months. The 2011 Nine Months other income was primarily related to a gain on the sale of marketable securities and a change in certain long term liabilities and the 2010 Nine Months other expense of $690,000 included offsetting settlements related to our Whitehorse Center litigation and the 2008 sale of our interest in the Botany Downs cinema, a $605,000 loss associated our Mackie litigation, and a recovery of previously written-off receivables.

During the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded a $66,000 loss on sale of assets primarily related to the disposal of certain obsolete assets. During the 2010 Nine Months, we recorded a $350,000 gain on sale of assets primarily related to a deferred gain on sale of a property.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an income tax benefit of $13.2 million primarily associated with a one-time tax provision adjustment of $14.4 million. For the 2010 Nine Months, we recorded an income tax expense of $13.7 million primarily relating to additional tax accrual associated with our potential tax exposures related to our tax litigation settlement. For more information regarding these tax provision and accrual adjustments see Note 10 – Income Tax.

-34-

Table of Contents

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded an increase in our equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities of $177,000 primarily related to partnership distributions from our Rialto Distributions investment of $258,000 offset by a decrease in earnings from our Rialto Cinemas investment of $195,000.

For the 2011 Nine Months, we recorded a gain on the sale of a discontinued operation for our Elsternwick Cinema of $1.7 million that is included in our income from discontinued operations.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Reading International, Inc. Common Shareholders

During 2011, we recorded a net income attributable to Reading International, Inc. common shareholders of $37,000 for the 2011 Quarter compared to $1.2 million for the 2010 Quarter and a net income of $15.0 million for the 2011 Nine Months compared to a net loss of $12.1 million for the 2010 Nine Months. The change from a net loss to a net income from 2010 to 2011 was primarily a tax provision adjustment of $14.4 million in 2011 and an income tax accrual of $12.0 million for our tax litigation settlement and a property impairment charge of $2.2 million in 2010.

Acquisition

On August 25, 2011, we purchased a 17-screen multiplex in Murrieta, California for $4.3 million made up of $3.9 million of cash and a $250,000 note which is subject to reduction to reflect post-closing adjustments to the purchase price (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities). Pursuant to ASC 805-10-25, we are in the process of finalizing the purchase accounting for this acquisition.

Business Plan, Capital Resources, and Liquidity

Business Plan

Our cinema exhibition business plan is to continue to identify, develop, and acquire cinema properties, where reasonably available, that allow us to leverage our cinema expertise and technology over a larger operating base. Our real estate business plan is to continue development of our existing land assets to be sensitive to opportunities to convert our entertainment assets to higher and better uses, or, when appropriate, dispose of such assets. Because we believe that current economic conditions are not conducive to obtaining the pre-construction leasing commitments necessary to justify commencement of construction, we currently focus our development efforts on improving and enhancing land entitlements and negotiating with end users for build to suit projects. In addition, we review opportunities to monetize our assets where such action leads to a financially acceptable outcome. We will also continue to investigate potential synergistic acquisitions that may not readily fall into either of our two currently identified segments.

-35-

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our secured debt and lease obligations at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

	2011		2012		2013		2014		2015		Thereafter		Total
Debt	$	2,977	$	49,695	$	21,755	$	74,582	$	20,842	$	--	$	169,851
Notes payable to related parties		--		--		9,000		--		--		--		9,000
Subordinated notes (trust preferred securities)		--		--		--		--		--		27,913		27,913
Pension liability		2		18		28		37		48		4,562		4,695
Lease obligations		7,743		29,225		27,002		23,454		19,635		81,546		188,605
Estimated interest on debt		3,948		12,908		10,427		5,529		2,061		13,602		48,475
Total	$	14,670	$	91,846	$	68,212	$	103,602	$	42,586	$	127,623	$	448,539

We base estimated interest on long-term debt on the anticipated loan balances for future periods calculated against current fixed and variable interest rates.

We adopted FASB ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes – Uncertain Tax Positions on January 1, 2007. As of adoption, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions was $12.5 million decreasing to $2.2 million as of September 30, 2011. On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”) agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000.

Unconsolidated Debt

Total debt of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities was $652,000 and $653,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Our share of unconsolidated debt, based on our ownership percentage, was $217,000 and $218,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. This loan is guaranteed by one of our subsidiaries to the extent of our ownership percentage.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations (including contingent obligations) that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in the financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

Currency Risk

We are subject to currency risk because we conduct a significant portion of our business in Australia and New Zealand. Set forth below is a chart indicating the various exchange rates at certain points in time for the Australian and New Zealand Dollar vis-à-vis the US Dollar over the past 20 years.

-36-

Table of Contents

We do not engage in currency hedging activities. Rather, to the extent possible, we operate our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis. Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies. As a result, we have procured in local currencies the majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand. Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand and our historic practice of funding our asset growth through local borrowings, our revenues are not yet significantly greater than our operating expenses and interest charges in these countries. As we continue to progress with our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, the effect of variations in currency values will likely increase.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our obligations and commitments drives our liquidity position. This is further affected by our ability to obtain adequate, reasonable financing and/or to convert non-performing or non-strategic assets into cash.

Currently, our liquidity needs arise primarily from:

·	capital expenditure needs for our expanding digital and 3D implementations;

·	working capital requirements; and

·	debt servicing requirements.

Cash Liquidity

Of the $26.8 million cash on hand at September 30, 2011, $13.1 million was in Australia, $11.2 million was in the U.S., and $2.5 million was in New Zealand. Of the $13.1 million in Australia, pursuant to our new NAB credit agreement, we are only able to transfer $3.9 million (AUS$4.0 million) per year outside of Australia, which has already been transferred to the U.S. for 2011, without the approval of the lender. Of the $11.2 million in the U.S., $5.6 million is included in our Consolidated Entertainment subsidiary and is subject to certain debt covenants with GE Capital that limit the use of this cash outside of the subsidiary without the approval of the lender. Therefore, at September 30, 2011, Reading had approximately $8.1 million of cash worldwide that is not restricted by covenants.

-37-

Table of Contents

Long-Term Debt

Australian Credit Facility

On June 24, 2011, we replaced our Australian Corporate Credit Facility of $115.8 million (AUS$110.0 million) with BOS International with a new credit facility from National Australia Bank of $110.5 million (AUS$105.0 million) (see Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt (Trust Preferred Securities)).

New Zealand Credit Facility

The term of our New Zealand Credit Facility with Westpac matures on March 31, 2012. Accordingly, the September 30, 2011 outstanding balance of this debt of $21.5 million (NZ$28.0 million) is classified as current on our balance sheet. We are continuing discussions with our current lender as to the renewal of this facility.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operations was $17.1 million in the 2011 Nine Months compared to $15.5 million in the 2010 Nine Months. The increase in cash provided by operations of $1.6 million was due primarily to a $4.4 million change in operating assets and liabilities (excluding $12.8 million accrual for our tax litigation settlement) and $2.8 million decrease of operational cash flows (including $12.8 million accrual for our tax litigation settlement).

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was $2.8 million compared to $15.8 million from the same period in 2010, a change of $13.0 million. The $2.8 million of cash used in investing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to:

·	$4.8 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;

·	$3.9 million for the purchase of the CalOaks cinema;

·	$2.8 million for the purchase of mortgage notes receivable; and

·	$119,000 of a change in restricted cash;

offset by

·	$124,000 of proceeds from the sale of marketable securities;

·	$6.8 million of proceeds from the pay off of a long-term other receivable;

·	$1.9 million of net proceeds from the sale of our 66.7% share of the 5-screen Elsternwick Classic cinema located in Melbourne, Australia.

The $15.8 million cash used for the 2010 Nine Months was primarily related to:

·	$9.1 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;

·	$5.4 million in acquisitions; and

·	$1.6 million of change in restricted cash

offset by

·	$200,000 in return of investment of unconsolidated entities.

-38-

Table of Contents

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities for the 2011 Nine Months was $21.1 million compared to $936,000 for the same period in 2010 resulting in a change of $20.2 million. The $21.1 million in cash used in financing activities during the 2011 Nine Months was primarily related to:

·	$104.5 million of new borrowing including $104.2 million of loan proceeds from our new NAB loan net of $774,000 of capitalized borrowing costs and $1.1 million of borrowing from our New Zealand credit facility; and

·	$163,000 in noncontrolling interests’ contributions.

offset by

·	$124.9 million of loan repayments including the $105.8 million payoff of our Australian BOSI loan, $4.3 million in loan repayment on our GE Capital Loan, $9.7 million payoff of our NAB revolver , $1.6 million loan repayment of our NAB term debt, and $2.0 million pay down of our Nationwide Notes;

·	$328,000 of repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock; and

·	$655,000 in noncontrolling interests’ distributions.

The $936,000 in cash used in financing activities during the 2010 Nine Months was primarily related to:

·	$8.0 million of borrowing on our New Zealand credit facility;

·	$7.2 million of borrowing proceeds from our new Union Square Theater Term Loan net of capitalized borrowing costs;

·	$200,000 of contributions from noncontrolling interests; and

·	$253,000 of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options;

offset by

·	$15.4 million of loan repayments including $6.9 million for the pay off of our Union Square Term Loan, $5.0 million for the pay off of our SHC Loan, and $3.2 million pay down of our GE Capital Loan;

·	$251,000 of repurchase of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock; and

·	$1.0 million in noncontrolling interest distributions.

-39-

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations and the most demanding in their calls on judgment. Although accounting for our core business of cinema and live theater exhibition with a real estate focus is relatively straightforward, we believe our most critical accounting policies relate to:

·	impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets;

·	tax valuation allowance and obligations; and

·	legal and environmental obligations.

We discuss these critical accounting policies in our 2010 Annual Report and advise you to refer to that discussion.

Financial Risk Management

Our internally developed risk management procedure, seeks to minimize the potentially negative effects of changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates on the results of operations. Our primary exposure to fluctuations in the financial markets is currently due to changes in currency exchange rates between U.S and Australia and New Zealand, and interest rates.

As our operational focus continues to shift to Australia and New Zealand, unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses could materially affect our financial position. We currently manage our currency exposure by creating, whenever possible, natural hedges in Australia and New Zealand. This involves local country sourcing of goods and services as well as borrowing in local currencies.

Our exposure to interest rate risk arises out of our long-term debt obligations. Consistent with our internally developed guidelines, we seek to reduce the negative effects of changes in interest rates by changing the character of the interest rate on our long-term debt, converting a variable rate into a fixed rate. Our internal procedures allow us to enter into derivative contracts on certain borrowing transactions to achieve this goal. Our Australian credit facilities provide for floating interest rates but require that not less than a certain percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations using derivative contracts.

Inflation

We continually monitor inflation and the effects of changing prices. Inflation increases the cost of goods and services used. Competitive conditions in many of our markets restrict our ability to recover fully the higher costs of acquired goods and services through price increases. We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation by implementing continuous process improvement solutions to enhance productivity and efficiency and, as a result, lower costs and operating expenses. In our opinion, we have managed the effects of inflation appropriately, and, as a result, it has not had a material impact on our operations and the resulting financial position or liquidity.

-40-

Table of Contents

Litigation

We are currently, and are from time to time, involved with claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. Some examples of the types of claims are:

·	contractual obligations;

·	insurance claims;

·	IRS claims;

·	employment matters;

·	environmental matters; and

·	anti-trust issues.

Where we are the plaintiffs, we expense all legal fees on an on-going basis and make no provision for any potential settlement amounts until received. In Australia, the prevailing party is entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees, which typically works out to be approximately 60% of the amounts actually spent where first class legal counsel is engaged at customary rates. Where we are a plaintiff, we have likewise made no provision for the liability for the defendant’s attorneys' fees in the event we are determined not to be the prevailing party.

Where we are the defendants, we accrue for probable damages, which insurance may not cover, as they become known and can be reasonably estimated. In our opinion, any claims and litigation in which we are currently involved are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. However, we do not give any assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such claims and litigation. The resolution of such claims and litigation could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending on the level of income for such period. Except as noted below, there have been no material changes to our litigation exposure since our 2010 Annual Report.

U.S. Federal Tax Settlement

As indicated in our 2010 Annual Report, our subsidiary, Craig Corporation (“Craig”), and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in July 2010, settled the proposed assessment by the IRS against Craig for the 1996 tax year. The original assessment of $20.1 million plus interest was settled for $5.4 million plus interest, as reflected in the final judgment of the Tax Court dated January 6, 2011. On October 26, 2011, the IRS and our subsidiary Craig Corporation (“Craig”) agreed to a payment arrangement that will allow Craig to retire this tax settlement debt in approximately five years though monthly payments of $290,000. We anticipate federal and state tax deductions will be available for interest paid to the IRS and to state tax agencies, and that a federal deduction will be available for taxes paid to state tax agencies.

The impact of the settlement upon our liability for state taxes remains uncertain but if the adjustment to income agreed with the IRS were reflected on state returns, it would cause a state tax obligation of approximately $1.4 million plus interest and penalty. As of September 30, 2011, no deficiency has been asserted by the State of California, and we have made no final decision as to the course of action to be followed if a deficiency were to be asserted.

Forward-Looking Statements

Our statements in this interim quarterly report contain a variety of forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect only our expectations regarding future events and operating performance and necessarily speak only as of the date the information was prepared. We cannot guarantee that our expectation will be realized in whole or in part. You can recognize these statements by our use of words such as, by way of example, “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” and “anticipate” or other similar terminology.

-41-

Table of Contents

These forward-looking statements reflect our expectation after having considered a variety of risks and uncertainties. However, they are necessarily the product of internal discussion and do not necessarily completely reflect the views of individual members of our Board of Directors or of our management team. Individual Board members and individual members of our management team may have different views as to the risks and uncertainties involved, and may have different views as to future events or our operating performance.

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying our forward-looking statements are the following:

·	With respect to our cinema operations:

o	The number and attractiveness to movie goers of the films released in future periods;

o	The amount of money spent by film distributors to promote their motion pictures;

o	The ability to implement digital and 3D projectors throughout our cinema circuits worldwide;

o	The licensing fees and terms required by film distributors from motion picture exhibitors in order to exhibit their films;

o	The continued willingness of moviegoers to spend money on our concession items;

o	The comparative attractiveness of motion pictures as a source of entertainment and willingness and/or ability of consumers (i) to spend their dollars on entertainment and (ii) to spend their entertainment dollars on movies in an outside the home environment;

The extent to which we encounter competition from other cinema exhibitors, from other sources of outside of the home entertainment, and from inside the home entertainment options, such as “home theaters” and competitive film product distribution technology such as, by way of example, cable, satellite broadcast, DVD and VHS rentals and sales, and so called “movies on demand”; and

o	The extent to and the efficiency with which, we are able to integrate acquisitions of cinema circuits with our existing operations.

·	With respect to our real estate development and operation activities:

o	The rental rates and capitalization rates applicable to the markets in which we operate and the quality of properties that we own;

o	The extent to which we can obtain on a timely basis the various land use approvals and entitlements needed to develop our properties;

o	The risks and uncertainties associated with real estate development;

o	The availability and cost of labor and materials;

o	Competition for development sites and tenants;

o	Environmental remediation issues; and

o	The extent to which our cinemas can continue to serve as an anchor tenant who will, in turn, be influenced by the same factors as will influence generally the results of our cinema operations.

-42-

Table of Contents

·	With respect to our operations generally as an international company involved in both the development and operation of cinemas and the development and operation of real estate:

o	Our ongoing access to borrowed funds and capital and the interest that must be paid on that debt and the returns that must be paid on such capital;

o	The relative values of the currency used in the countries in which we operate;

o	Changes in government regulation;

o	Our labor relations and costs of labor (including future government requirements with respect to pension liabilities, disability insurance and health coverage, and vacations and leave);

Our exposure from time to time to legal claims and to uninsurable risks such as those related to our historic railroad operations, including potential environmental claims and health related claims relating to alleged exposure to asbestos or other substances now or in the future, recognized as being possible causes of cancer or other health related problems;

o	Changes in future effective tax rates and the results of currently ongoing and future potential audits by taxing authorities having jurisdiction over our various companies; and

o	Changes in applicable accounting policies and practices.

The above list is not exhaustive, as business is inherently unpredictable, risky, and subject to influence by numerous factors outside of our control. Such factors include changes in government regulation or policy, competition, interest rates, supply, technological innovation, changes in consumer taste and fancy, weather, and the extent to which consumers in our markets have the economic ability to spend money on beyond-the-home entertainment.

Given the variety and unpredictability of the factors that will ultimately influence our businesses and our results of operation, it naturally follows that no guarantees can be given that any of our forward-looking statements will ultimately prove to be correct. Actual results will undoubtedly vary and there is no guarantee as to how our securities will perform either when considered in isolation or when compared to other securities or investment opportunities.

Finally, please understand that we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any of our forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable law. Accordingly, you should always note the date to which our forward-looking statements speak.

Additionally, certain of the presentations included in this interim quarterly report may contain “non-GAAP financial measures.” In such case, we will make available in connection with such statements a reconciliation of this information to our GAAP financial statements.

-43-

Table of Contents

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

The SEC requires that registrants include information about potential effects of changes in currency exchange and interest rates in their filings. Several alternatives, all with some limitations, have been offered. We base the following discussion on a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates. This analysis is constrained by several factors, including the following:

·	It is based on a single point in time; and

·	It does not include the effects of other complex market reactions that would arise from the changes modeled.

Although the results of such an analysis may be useful as a benchmark, they should not be viewed as forecasts.

At September 30, 2011, approximately 56% and 17% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand), respectively, including approximately $15.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2010, approximately 55% and 16% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand) including approximately $18.1 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies. As a result, we have procured in local currencies a majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand. Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand, our revenue is not yet significantly greater than our operating and interest expenses. Despite this natural hedge, recent movements in foreign currencies have had an effect on our current earnings. Although foreign currency has had a nominal effect on our current earnings, the effect of the translation adjustment on our assets and liabilities noted in our other comprehensive income was a decrease of $18.2 million and $6.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. As we continue to progress our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, we cannot assure you that the foreign currency effect on our earnings will be negligible in the future.

Historically, our policy has been to borrow in local currencies to finance the development and construction of our ETRCs in Australia and New Zealand whenever possible. As a result, the borrowings in local currencies have provided somewhat of a natural hedge against the foreign currency exchange exposure. Even so, and as a result of our issuance of fully subordinated notes (TPS) in 2007, and their subsequent partial repayment, approximately 56% and 52% of our Australian and New Zealand assets, respectively, remain subject to such exposure unless we elect to hedge our foreign currency exchange between the US and Australian and New Zealand dollars. If the foreign currency rates were to fluctuate by 10% the resulting change in Australian and New Zealand assets would be $13.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and the change in our quarterly net income would be $1.9 million and $116,000, respectively. Presently, we have no plan to hedge such exposure.

We record unrealized foreign currency translation gains or losses that could materially affect our financial position. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we have recorded a cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gain of approximately $52.3 million and $59.1 million, respectively.

Historically, we maintain most of our cash and cash equivalent balances in short-term money market instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Due to the short-term nature of such investments, a change of 1% in short-term interest rates would not have a material effect on our financial condition.

-44-

Table of Contents

While we have typically used fixed rate financing (secured by first mortgages) in the U.S., fixed rate financing is typically not available to corporate borrowers in Australia and New Zealand. The majority of our Australian and New Zealand bank loans have variable rates. The Australian facility provides for floating interest rates, but requires that not less than a certain percentage of the loan be swapped into fixed rate obligations (see Financial Risk Management above). If we consider the interest rate swaps, a 1% increase or decrease in short-term interest rates would have resulted in approximately $70,000 increase or decrease in our 2011 Quarter’s Australian and New Zealand interest expense.

-45-

Table of Contents

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such, term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-46-

Table of Contents

PART II – Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

For a description of legal proceedings, please refer to Item 3 entitled Legal Proceedings contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

For a description of grants of stock to certain executives, see the Stock-Based Compensation section under see Note 2 – Equity and Stock-Based Compensation, above.

Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4 - Removed and Reserved

None.

Item 5 - Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6 - Exhibits

31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32	Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

-47-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date:	November 3, 2011	By:	/s/ James J. Cotter
			James J. Cotter
			Chief Executive Officer

Date:	November 3, 2011	By:	/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
			Andrzej Matyczynski
			Chief Financial Officer

-48-

Table of Contents

exhibit31_1.htm

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James J. Cotter, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By:	/s/ James J. Cotter
	James J. Cotter
	Chief Executive Officer
	November 3, 2011

exhibit31_2.htm

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrzej Matyczynski, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International, Inc.;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

By:	/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
	Andrzej Matyczynski
	Chief Financial Officer
	November 3, 2011

exhibit32.htm

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Reading International, Inc. (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

·	The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·	The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 3, 2011

/s/ James J. Cotter

Name: James J. Cotter

Title: Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski

Name: Andrzej Matyczynski

Title: Chief Financial Officer