Reading International

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

form10q.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

__________________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2008

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ___________

Commission file number 1-8625

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	95-3885184 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

500 Citadel Drive, Suite 300 Commerce CA (Address of principal executive offices)	90040 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (213) 235-2240

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 5, 2008, there were 20,987,115 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share and 1,495,490 shares of Class B Voting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share outstanding.

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I – Financial Information	1
Item 1 – Financial Statements	1
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	1
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	45
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	47
PART II – Other Information	48
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	48
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48
Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities	48
Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders	48
Item 5 - Other Information	48
Item 6 - Exhibits	48
SIGNATURES	49

Table of Contents

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1 – Financial Statements

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,119		$	20,783
Receivables		7,220			5,670
Inventory		695			654
Investment in marketable securities		4,085			4,533
Restricted cash		--			59
Assets held for sale		22,775			25,942
Prepaid and other current assets		2,334			3,799
Total current assets		62,228			61,440
Land held for sale		--			1,984
Property held for development		7,304			9,289
Property under development		69,387			66,787
Property & equipment, net		179,789			154,011
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		13,603			15,480
Investment in Reading International Trust I		1,547			1,547
Goodwill		23,808			19,100
Intangible assets, net		23,999			8,448
Other assets		10,483			7,985
Total assets	$	392,148		$	346,071

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	11,634		$	12,331
Film rent payable		4,326			3,275
Notes payable – current portion		1,533			395
Note payable to related party – current portion		--			5,000
Taxes payable		6,115			4,770
Deferred current revenue		3,130			3,214
Liabilities of assets held for sale		--			--
Other current liabilities		202			169
Total current liabilities		26,940			29,154
Notes payable – long-term portion		173,774			111,253
Notes payable to related party – long-term portion		14,000			9,000
Subordinated debt		51,547			51,547
Noncurrent tax liabilities		6,070			5,418
Deferred non-current revenue		609			566
Other liabilities		17,654			14,936
Total liabilities		290,594			221,874
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Minority interest in consolidated affiliates		2,288			2,835
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, par value $0.01, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 35,564,339 issued and 20,987,115 outstanding at September 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007		216			216
Class B Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,495,490 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007		15			15
Nonvoting Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 12,000 shares authorized and no outstanding shares		--			--
Additional paid-in capital		132,838			131,930
Accumulated deficit		(54,676	)		(52,670	)
Treasury shares		(4,306	)		(4,306	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		25,179			46,177
Total stockholders’ equity		99,266			121,362
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	392,148		$	346,071

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-1-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Revenue
Cinema	$	52,909		$	28,009		$	135,693		$	76,825
Real estate		3,619			3,068			11,779			10,124
		56,528			31,077			147,472			86,949
Operating expense
Cinema		41,765			20,041			109,597			56,878
Real estate		2,253			2,044			6,139			5,462
Depreciation and amortization		4,877			2,647			13,829			7,970
General and administrative		4,397			3,871			13,993			11,424
		53,292			28,603			143,558			81,734

Operating income		3,236			2,474			3,914			5,215

Interest income		221			329			829			558
Interest expense		(4,183	)		(2,606	)		(10,661	)		(6,536	)
Loss on sale of assets		--			--			--			(185	)
Other income		(1,009	)		707			2,033			435
Income (loss) before minority interest expense, discontinued operations, income tax expense, and equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(1,735	)		904			(3,885	)		(513	)
Minority interest expense		(85	)		(162	)		(246	)		(657	)
Income (loss) before discontinued operations, income tax expense, and equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(1,820	)		742			(4,131	)		(1,170	)
Gain on sale of a discontinued operation, net of tax		--			--			--			1,912
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		178			45			371			(67	)
Income (loss) before income tax expense and equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(1,642	)		787			(3,760	)		675
Income tax expense		(689	)		(501	)		(1,513	)		(1,443	)
Income (loss) before equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(2,331	)		286			(5,273	)		(768	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		270			584			817			2,626
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity		--			--			2,450			--
Net income (loss)	$	(2,061	)	$	870		$	(2,006	)	$	1,858

Earnings (loss) per common share – basic and diluted:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.10	)	$	0.04		$	(0.11	)	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		0.01			0.00			0.02			0.08
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.04		$	(0.09	)	$	0.08
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic		22,476,904			22,487,943			22,476,514			22,486,395
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – dilutive		22,476,904			22,761,270			22,476,514			22,759,723

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-2-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(2,006	)	$	1,858
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain recognized on foreign currency transactions		(446	)		(132	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(817	)		(2,626	)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		731			4,693
(Gain) loss on marketable securities		1			(773	)
Gain on sale of an unconsolidated entity		(2,450	)		--
Gain on sale of a discontinued operation		--			(1,912	)
Loss on sale of assets		--			185
Loss on extinguishment of debt		--			98
Loss related to impairment of assets		1,049			--
Gain on insurance settlement		(910	)		--
Depreciation and amortization		14,511			8,933
Amortization of prior service costs		214			177
Amortization of above and below market leases		638			--
Stock based compensation expense		908			775
Minority interest		246			657
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in receivables		(1,908	)		2,510
(Increase) decrease in prepaid and other assets		159			(34	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,729			(1,023	)
Increase (decrease) in film rent payable		1,225			(1,428	)
Increase in deferred revenues and other liabilities		2,978			1,576
Net cash provided by operating activities		15,852			13,534
Investing activities
Acquisitions		(51,746	)		(20,631	)
Acquisition deposit returned		2,000			--
Purchases of and additions to property and equipment		(18,431	)		(17,348	)
Change in restricted cash		(214	)		796
Investment in Reading International Trust I		--			(1,547	)
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		(381	)		--
Distributions of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		214			2,186
Purchase of marketable securities		--			(15,548	)
Net proceeds from the sale of an unconsolidated entity		3,267			--
Option proceeds related to property held for sale		1,095			--
Sale of marketable securities		--			19,900
Proceeds from insurance settlement		910			--
Net cash used in investing activities		(63,286	)		(32,192	)
Financing activities
Repayment of long-term borrowings		(8,670	)		(55,813	)
Proceeds from borrowings		66,285			96,098
Capitalized borrowing costs		(2,498	)		(2,334	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		--			25
Minority interest distributions		(788	)		(3,856	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		54,329			34,120
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(2,559	)		678

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		4,336			16,140
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		20,783			11,008

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	25,119		$	27,148

Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	$	13,547		$	8,625
Income taxes paid	$	221		$	252
Non-cash transactions
Note payable due to Seller issued for acquisition (Note 19)	$	14,750		$	--
Decrease in cost basis of Cinema 1, 2 & 3 related to the purchase price adjustment of the call option liability to related party	$	--		$	(2,100	)
Adjustment to accumulated deficit related to adoption of FIN 48 (Note 10)	$	--		$	509
Decrease in deposit payable and increase in minority interest liability related to the exercise of the Cinema 1, 2 & 3 call option by a related party	$	--		$	(3,000	)
Decrease in call option liability and increase in additional paid in capital related to the exercise of the Cinema 1, 2 & 3 call option by a related party	$	--		$	(2,513	)
Accrued construction-in-progress costs	$	--		$	(2,440	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

Reading International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RDI” and collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, the “Company,” “Reading” and “we,” “us,” or “our”), was founded in 1983 as a Delaware corporation and reincorporated in 1999 in Nevada. Our businesses consist primarily of:

the development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand and

the development, ownership, and operation of retail and commercial real estate in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) for interim reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim reporting. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures typically required by US GAAP for complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted. There have been no material changes in the information disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“2007 Annual Report”). The financial information presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “September Report”), including the information under the heading, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, should be read in conjunction with our 2007 Annual Report which contains the latest audited financial statements and related footnotes.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of our operations and cash flows as of and for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 have been made. The results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year.

Marketable Securities

We have investments in marketable securities of $4.1 million at September 30, 2008. These investments are accounted for as available for sale investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, as amended by FSP FAS 115-1/124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, assessments of potential impairment for these investments are performed for each applicable reporting period. We have determined that there was no impairment for these investments at September 30, 2008. These investments have a cumulative unrealized gain of $16,000 included in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2008. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $6,000 and $2,000, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, our net unrealized loss on marketable securities was $880,000 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 our net unrealized gain on marketable securities was $82,000. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we sold $13.4 million and $19.1 million, respectively, of our marketable securities resulting in realized gain on sale of $549,000 and $773,000, respectively, which is included in other income on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

-4-

Table of Contents

Other Income

Included in our nine months ended September 30, 2008 other income is $910,000 of insurance settlement proceeds related to damage caused by Hurricane George in 1998 to one of our previously owned cinemas in Puerto Rico, as well as legal settlement proceeds received on our Burstone litigation of $1.1 million and credit card dispute proceeds of $385,000 (See Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies).

Deferred Leasing Costs

Direct costs incurred in connection with obtaining tenants are amortized over the respective term of the lease on a straight-line basis.

Deferred Financing Costs

Direct costs incurred in connection with financing are amortized over the respective term of the loan utilizing the effective interest method, or straight-line method if the result is not materially different. In addition, interest on loans with increasing interest rates and scheduled principal pre-payments is also recognized on the effective interest method.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted on January 1, 2008

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted, on a prospective basis, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”) as amended by FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (“FSP FAS 157-1”) and FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP FAS 157-2”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies prospectively to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. FSP FAS 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude from the scope of SFAS 157 certain leasing transactions accounted for under SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. FSP FAS 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to defer the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.

The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We are evaluating the impact that SFAS 157 will have on our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, since the application of SFAS 157 for such items was deferred, in our case, to January 1, 2009. We believe that the impact of these items will not be material to our consolidated financial statements. Assets and liabilities, typically recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis, but to which we have not yet applied SFAS 157 due to the deferral of SFAS 157 for such items include:

Non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in an acquisition or business combination

Long-lived assets measured at fair value due to an impairment assessment under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

Asset retirement obligations initially measured under SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations

-5-

Table of Contents

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted, on a prospective basis, SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of the guidance is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements since we did not elect to apply the fair value option for any of our eligible financial instruments or other items on the January 1, 2008 effective date.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires (i) that noncontrolling (minority) interests be reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, (ii) that net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be separately identified in the consolidated statement of operations, (iii) that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, (iv) that any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, and (v) that sufficient disclosures are provided that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008, which is the year ending December 31, 2009 for the Company, and should be applied prospectively. However, the presentation and disclosure requirements of the statement shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 160 is not anticipated to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). This new standard enhances disclosure requirements for derivative instruments in order to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities and its related interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is to be applied prospectively for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after November 15, 2008. We believe that the adoption of SFAS 161 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statement disclosures since we solely have interest rate swap agreements not formally designated as cash flow hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.

FASB Staff Position 142-3

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 is to be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP 142-3 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows but currently does not believe it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

-6-

Table of Contents

Note 2 – Stock-Based and Equity Compensation

Stock Based Compensation

On August 21, 2008, as part of their executive compensation, 37,388 shares of fully vested restricted Class A Non-Voting Common Stock were granted to three of our executives as stock bonuses having a grant date fair value of $286,000. As of September 30, 2008, these shares had yet to be issued to them and the executives had the option to accept the shares or to receive a reduced cash payment in lieu of shares.

As part of his compensation package, Mr. John Hunter, our Chief Operating Officer, was granted $100,000 of restricted Class A Non-Voting Common Stock on February 12, 2008 and 2007. These stock grants have vesting periods of two years and stock grant prices of $9.70 and $8.63, respectively. On February 11, 2008, $50,000 of restricted Class A Non-Voting Common Stock vested related to Mr. Hunter’s 2007 grant. The 5,794 shares related to this vesting have yet to be issued to him. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded compensation expense of $100,000 and $296,000, respectively, and during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded compensation expense of $59,000 and $178,000, respectively, for the vesting of all our restricted stock grants. In July 2008, Mr. Jay Laifman started with the Company as our Corporate General Counsel. As part of his compensation package, Mr. Laifman was granted $100,000 of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock or 10,638 shares upon acceptance of his employment agreement. This stock grant has a vesting period of two years.

The following table details the grants and vesting of restricted stock to our employees (dollars in thousands):

	Non-Vested Restricted Stock			Fair Value at Grant Date
Outstanding – December 31, 2007		61,756		$	524
Granted		58,335		$	468
Vested		(53,820	)	$	(418	)
Outstanding – September 30, 2008		66,271		$	574

Equity Compensation

In 2006, we formed two new wholly owned subsidiaries, Landplan Property Partners, Pty Ltd and Landplan Property Partners New Zealand, Ltd collectively referred to as Landplan Property Partners (“LPP”), to engage in the real estate development business. We have granted the President of LPP, Doug Osborne, as incentive compensation, a subordinated carried interest in certain property trusts, owned by LPP and formed to acquire and hold LPP’s real property investments. That incentive interest may range between 27.5% and 15%, depending on a number of factors including the amount and duration of LPP’s investment in the properties held by these property trusts. Mr. Osborne’s incentive interest is subordinated to (i) the repayment of all third party indebtedness, (ii) the repayment of all funds invested or advanced by Reading, and (iii) the realization by Reading of an 11% annual compounded preferred return on its capital. The estimated value of Mr. Osborne’s incentive interest of $269,000 at September 30, 2008 is included in the minority interest of LPP at September 30, 2008 (see Note 14 – Minority Interest). This amount is based upon a current evaluation of the properties held by these property trusts, all of which are in various stages of development, and not upon any realized or closed transaction. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we adjusted the expense for these interests based on more current project estimates for our Lake Taupo and Indooroopilly projects resulting in a reduction of the three months expense of $6,000 and a nine months ended September 30, 2008 expense of $85,000. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we expensed $59,000 and $155,000,

-7-

Table of Contents

respectively, associated with Mr. Osborne’s interests. At September 30, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to the LPP equity awards was $214,000, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of approximately 73 months. No amounts, however, will be payable unless the properties held by the property trusts, on a consolidated basis, provide returns on capital in excess of 11%, compounded annually.

Employee/Director Stock Option Plan

We have a long-term incentive stock option plan that provides for the grant to eligible employees and non-employee directors of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Nonvoting Common Stock.

When the Company’s tax deduction from an option exercise exceeds the compensation cost resulting from the option, a tax benefit is created. SFAS No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123(R)”, requires that excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises be reflected as financing cash inflows instead of operating cash inflows. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, there was no impact to the consolidated statement of cash flows because there were no recognized tax benefits from stock option exercises during these periods.

SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate forfeitures. Based on our historical experience and the relative market price to strike price of the options, we do not currently estimate any forfeitures of vested or unvested options.

In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we estimate the fair value of our options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which takes into account assumptions such as the dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate, the expected stock price volatility, and the expected life of the options. The dividend yield is excluded from the calculation, as it is our present intention to retain all earnings. We expense the estimated grant date fair values of options issued on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

We granted 301,250 of options during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Of these options, 70,000 were granted to our directors as fully vested options during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. There were no options granted to our directors or employees during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008 or during the three months ended September 30, 2007. We estimated the fair value of the 2007 option grants at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	2007
Stock option exercise price	$ 8.35 - $10.30
Risk-free interest rate	4.636 - 4.824%
Expected dividend yield	--
Expected option life	9.60 - 9.96 yrs
Expected volatility	33.64 - 45.47%
Weighted average fair value	$4.42 - $ 4.82

Using the above assumptions and in accordance with the SFAS 123(R) modified prospective method, we recorded $160,000 and $480,000 in compensation expense for the total estimated grant date fair value of stock options that vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. We also recorded $177,000 and $597,000 in compensation expense for the total estimated grant date fair value of stock options that vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. At September 30, 2008, the total unrecognized estimated compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted was $396,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 0.86 years. No options were exercised during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008; therefore, no cash was received and no value was realized

-8-

Table of Contents

from the exercise of options during those periods. We recorded cash received from stock options exercised of $25,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The total realized value of these exercised stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $37,000. There were 1,875 and 122,500 and options vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 having a current intrinsic value of $0 for the period as all the options were “out-of-the-money” at September 30, 2008. Except for the 70,000 fully vested options granted to our directors during the first quarter of 2007, 1,875 and 6,875 options vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively; therefore, the grant date fair value of options vesting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $15,000 and $55,000, respectively. The intrinsic, unrealized value of all options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, at September 30, 2008 was $1.1 million of which 100.0% are currently exercisable.

All stock options granted have a contractual life of 10 years at the grant date. The aggregate total number of shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock and Class B Voting Common Stock authorized for issuance under our 1999 Stock Option Plan is 1,287,150. At the time that options are exercised, at the discretion of management, we will either issue treasury shares or make a new issuance of shares to the employee or board member. Dependent on the grant letter to the employee or board member, the required service period for option vesting is between zero and four years.

We had the following stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

	Common Stock Options Outstanding						Weighted Average Exercise Price of Options Outstanding				Common Stock Exercisable Options				Weighted Average Price of Exercisable Options
	Class A			Class B			Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B		Class A		Class B
Outstanding- January 1, 2007		514,100			185,100		$	5.21	$	9.90		488,475		185,100	$	5.06	$	9.90
Granted		151,250			150,000		$	9.37	$	10.24
Exercised		(6,250	)		--		$	4.01	$	--
Expired		(81,250	)		(150,000	)	$	10.25	$	10.24
Outstanding- December 31, 2007		577,850			185,100		$	5.60	$	9.90		477,850		35,100	$	4.72	$	8.47
No activity during the period		--			--		$	--	$	--
Outstanding-September 30, 2008		577,850			185,100		$	5.60	$	9.90		525,350		110,100	$	5.19	$	9.67

The weighted average remaining contractual life of all options outstanding, vested and expected to vest, at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was approximately 4.86 and 6.22 years, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the exercisable options outstanding at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was approximately 5.47 and 4.74 years, respectively.

Note 3 – Business Segments

Our operations are organized into two reportable business segments within the meaning of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Our reportable segments are (1) cinema exhibition and (2) real estate. The cinema segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of multiplex cinemas. The real estate segment is engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of commercial properties. Incident to our real estate operations we have acquired, and continue to hold, raw land in urban and suburban centers in Australia and New Zealand.

The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business segments for the three (“2008 Quarter”) and nine (“2008 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2008 and the three (“2007 Quarter”) and nine (“2007 Nine Months”) months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and live theatres and the management of

-9-

Table of Contents

rental properties. All operating results from discontinued operations are included in “Gain on sale of a discontinued operation” (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended September 30, 2008	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	52,909	$	5,588	$	(1,969	)	$	56,528
Operating expense		43,734		2,253		(1,969	)		44,018
Depreciation & amortization		3,834		880		--			4,714
General & administrative expense		1,106		255		--			1,361
Segment operating income	$	4,235	$	2,200	$	--		$	6,435
Three months ended September 30, 2007	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	28,009	$	4,858	$	(1,790	)	$	31,077
Operating expense		21,831		2,044		(1,790	)		22,085
Depreciation & amortization		1,591		917		--			2,508
General & administrative expense		793		176		--			969
Segment operating income	$	3,794	$	1,721	$	--		$	5,515

Reconciliation to consolidated net income (loss):	2008 Quarter			2007 Quarter
Total segment operating income	$	6,435		$	5,515
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		163			139
General and administrative expense		3,036			2,902
Operating income		3,236			2,474
Interest expense, net		(3,962	)		(2,277	)
Other income		(1,009	)		707
Minority interest		(85	)		(162	)
Income from discontinued operation		178			45
Income tax expense		(689	)		(501	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		270			584
Net income (loss)	$	(2,061	)	$	870

Nine months ended September 30, 2008	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	135,693	$	16,297	$	(4,518	)	$	147,472
Operating expense		114,115		6,139		(4,518	)		115,736
Depreciation & amortization		10,473		2,833		--			13,306
General & administrative expense		3,005		851		--			3,856
Segment operating income	$	8,100	$	6,474	$	--		$	14,574
Nine months ended September 30, 2007	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	76,825	$	14,205	$	(4,081	)	$	86,949
Operating expense		60,959		5,462		(4,081	)		62,340
Depreciation & amortization		4,909		2,645		--			7,554
General & administrative expense		2,317		763		--			3,080
Segment operating income	$	8,640	$	5,335	$	--		$	13,975

-10-

Table of Contents

Reconciliation to consolidated net income (loss):	2008 Nine Months			2007 Nine Months
Total segment operating income	$	14,574		$	13,975
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		523			416
General and administrative expense		10,137			8,344
Operating income		3,914			5,215
Interest expense, net		(9,832	)		(5,978	)
Other income		2,033			250
Minority interest		(246	)		(657	)
Gain on sale of a discontinued operation		--			1,912
Income (loss) from discontinued operation		371			(67	)
Income tax expense		(1,513	)		(1,443	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		817			2,626
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity		2,450			--
Net income (loss)	$	(2,006	)	$	1,858

Note 4 – Operations in Foreign Currency

We have significant assets in Australia and New Zealand. To the extent possible, we conduct our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis. The carrying value of our Australian and New Zealand assets and liabilities fluctuate due to changes in the exchange rates between the US dollar and the functional currency of Australia (Australian dollar) and New Zealand (New Zealand dollar). We have no derivative financial instruments to hedge against the risk of foreign currency exposure.

Presented in the table below are the currency exchange rates for Australia and New Zealand as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

	US Dollar
	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Australian Dollar	$	0.7904	$	0.8776
New Zealand Dollar	$	0.6690	$	0.7678

Note 5 – Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period after giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common shares had been issued. Stock options and non-vested stock awards give rise to potentially dilutive common shares. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, these shares are included in the dilutive loss per share calculation under the treasury stock method. The following is a calculation of earnings (loss) per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):

-11-

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007		2008			2007
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(2,239	)	$	825	$	(2,377	)	$	13
Income from discontinued operations		178			45		371			1,845
Net income (loss)	$	(2,061	)	$	870	$	(2,006	)	$	1,858

Earnings (loss) per common share – basic and diluted:
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.10	)	$	0.04	$	(0.11	)	$	0.00
Earnings from discontinued operations		0.01			0.00		0.02			0.08
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.09	)	$	0.04	$	(0.09	)	$	0.08
Weighted average common stock – basic		22,476,904			22,487,943		22,476,514			22,486,395
Weighted average common stock – dilutive		22,476,904			22,761,270		22,476,514			22,759,723

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the weighted average common stock – dilutive only included 273,327 of exercisable stock options. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded losses from continuing operations. As such, the incremental shares of 53,820 shares of unissued Class A Non-Voting Common Stock and 263,010 of exercisable stock options in 2008 were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share because they were anti-dilutive in those periods.

Note 6 - Property Held for Development, Property Under Development, and Property and Equipment

During the 2008 quarter we transferred land previously held for sale, into property held for development. The value of this property, relating to a New Zealand asset, was subsequently impaired by $1.0 million (NZ$1.6 million).

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we owned property under development summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property Under Development	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Land	$	33,149	$	36,994
Construction-in-progress (including capitalized interest)		36,238		29,793
Property Under Development	$	69,387	$	66,787

We recorded capitalized interest related to our properties under development for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 of $1.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and $3.1 million for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

-12-

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we owned investments in property and equipment as follows (dollars in thousands):

Property and equipment	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
Land	$	50,101		$	51,242
Building		89,221			96,321
Leasehold interests		45,231			12,171
Construction-in-progress		467			1,318
Fixtures and equipment		63,420			55,657
		248,440			216,709
Less: accumulated depreciation		(68,651	)		(62,698	)
Property and equipment, net	$	179,789		$	154,011

Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $4.2 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $12.0 million and $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In April 2008, we opened a newly leased 9-screen cinema in Rouse Hill, Australia. We fitted out the cinema with leasehold assets costing $1.3 million (AUS$1.4 million) and fixture and equipment costs of $3.9 million (AUS$4.1 million). Additionally, in August 2008, we opened a newly leased 6-screen cinema in Dandenong, Australia. We fitted out the cinema with leasehold assets costing $419,000 (AUS$472,000) and fixture and equipment costs of $467,000 (AUS$527,000).

Upon completion of our Lake Taupo property, we have transferred the assets related to the redeveloped property to land and building during the third quarter of 2008. These transfers resulted in an increase of our land and building balances of $994,000 (NZ$1.5 million) and $2.7 million (NZ$4.0 million), respectively.

Note 7 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Entities

Except as noted below regarding our investment in Malulani Investments, Limited, investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and, as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, include the following (dollars in thousands):

	Interest			September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Malulani Investments, Limited		29.3	%	$	1,800	$	1,800
Rialto Distribution		33.3	%		1,219		1,029
Rialto Cinemas		50.0	%		4,844		5,717
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC		25.0	%		1,146		1,059
Mt. Gravatt Cinema		33.3	%		4,594		5,159
Berkeley Cinemas – Botany		50.0	%		--		716
Total investment				$	13,603	$	15,480

-13-

Table of Contents

For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we recorded our share of equity earnings (loss) from our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and entities as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007		2008			2007
Rialto Distribution	$	100		$	3	$	272		$	91
Rialto Cinemas		9			74		(5	)		54
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC		87			201		87			1,550
Mt. Gravatt Cinema		222			184		680			610
Berkeley Cinema – Botany		(1	)		122		87			321
Other investments		(147	)		--		(304	)		--
Total equity earnings	$	270		$	584	$	817		$	2,626

Malulani Investments, Limited

We continue to treat this investment on a cost basis by recognizing earnings as they are distributed to us. We are currently in litigation with certain controlling shareholders and directors of Malulani Investments Limited (“MIL”).

Berkeley Cinemas

On June 6, 2008, we sold the Botany Downs Cinema to our joint venture partner for $3.3 million (NZ$4.3 million) resulting in a net gain on sale of an unconsolidated entity of $2.5 million (NZ$3.2 million). With the sale of this cinema, our unconsolidated joint venture debt decreased by $3.2 million (NZ$4.2 million) We continue to have certain outstanding, contingent claims related to interest and working capital, which may or may not increase the total sales price of the cinema.

Other Investments

From time to time, we will make investments in various activities that require equity method accounting including but not limited to investments in productions in our live theatres.

Note 8 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Subsequent to January 1, 2002, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we do not amortize goodwill. Instead, we perform an annual impairment review of our goodwill and other intangible assets in the fourth quarter unless changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had goodwill consisting of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Cinema			Real Estate			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2007	$	13,827		$	5,273		$	19,100
Goodwill acquired during 2008		6,306			--			6,306
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,493	)		(105	)		(1,598	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	18,640		$	5,168		$	23,808

We have intangible assets other than goodwill that are subject to amortization and are being amortized over various periods. We amortize our beneficial leases over the lease period, the longest of which is 20 years, our trade name using an accelerated amortization method over its estimated useful life of 50 years, and our option fee and other intangible assets over 10 years. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,

-14-

Table of Contents

amortization expense totaled $653,000 and $139,000, respectively; and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, amortization expense totaled $1.9 million and $614,000, respectively.

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

As of September 30, 2008	Beneficial Leases		Trade name		Option Fee		Other Intangible Assets		Total
Gross carrying amount	$	22,131	$	7,220	$	2,773	$	609	$	32,733
Less: Accumulated amortization		5,587		480		2,592		75		8,734
Total, net	$	16,544	$	6,740	$	181	$	534	$	23,999

As of December 31, 2007	Beneficial Leases		Trade name		Option Fee		Other Intangible Assets		Total
Gross carrying amount	$	12,295	$	--	$	2,773	$	238	$	15,306
Less: Accumulated amortization		4,311		--		2,521		26		6,858
Total, net	$	7,984	$	--	$	252	$	212	$	8,448

Note 9 – Prepaid and Other Assets

Prepaid and other assets are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid expenses	$	899	$	569
Prepaid taxes		486		602
Deposits		302		2,097
Other		647		531
Total prepaid and other current assets	$	2,334	$	3,799

Other non-current assets
Other non-cinema and non-rental real estate assets	$	1,260	$	1,270
Deferred financing costs, net		5,319		2,805
Interest rate swaps		741		526
Other receivables		2,470		1,648
Pre-acquisition costs		--		948
Other		693		788
Total non-current assets	$	10,483	$	7,985

-15-

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Income Tax

The income tax provision for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was composed of the following amounts (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Foreign income tax provision	$	113	$	122	$	228	$	282
Foreign withholding tax		183		168		562		480
Federal tax provision		365		128		619		383
Other income tax		28		83		104		298
Net tax provision	$	689	$	501	$	1,513	$	1,443

We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. As a result, we recognized a $509,000 cumulative increase to reserves for uncertain tax positions, which was accounted for as an adjustment to the beginning balance of accumulated deficit in 2007. As of that date, we also reclassified approximately $4.0 million in reserves from current taxes liabilities to noncurrent tax liabilities. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 the Company’s FIN 48 liability increased by $397,000 and $651,000, respectively, reflecting the accrual of interest for IRS matters under litigation.

Note 11 – Notes Payable and Subordinated Debt

Notes payable and subordinated debt are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Interest Rates as of					Balance as of
Name of Note Payable or Security	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007		Maturity Date	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Australian Corporate Credit Facility		8.69%		7.75%	June 30, 2011	$	79,435	$	85,772
Australian Shopping Center Loans		--		--	2007-2013		881		1,066
Australian Construction Loan		9.28%		--	January 1, 2015		1,855		--
New Zealand Corporate Credit Facility		8.90%		10.10%	November 23, 2010		2,168		2,488
Trust Preferred Securities		9.22%		9.22%	April 30, 2027		51,547		51,547
US Euro-Hypo Loan		6.73%		6.73%	June 30, 2012		15,000		15,000
US GE Capital Term Loan		6.90%		--	February 21, 2013		41,625		--
US Liberty Theatres Term Loans		6.20%		--	April 1, 2013		7,020		--
US Nationwide Loans 1		6.50% - 7.50%		--	February 21, 2013		18,627		--
US Nationwide Loans 2		8.50%		--	February 21, 2011		1,527		--
US Sutton Hill Capital Note 1 – Related Party		10.34%		9.91%	December 31, 2010		5,000		5,000
US Sutton Hill Capital Note 2 – Related Party		8.25%		8.25%	December 31, 2010		9,000		9,000
US Union Square Theatre Term Loan		6.26%		6.26%	January 1, 2010		7,169		7,322
Total						$	240,854	$	177,195

Australian Corporate Credit Facility

During June 2008, we extended the term of our $86.9 million (AUS$110.0 million) Australian facility to June 30, 2011. This facility will continue to roll to a 3-year term, following an annual bank review. Besides the extended term, the only other changes to the original agreement was that the loan requires interest only payments and our interest margin over BBSY (Bank Bill Swap Bid Rate) increased from 1.00% to 1.25%. The drawn balance of this loan was $79.4 million (AUS$100.5 million) at September 30, 2008.

-16-

Table of Contents

Australian Construction Loan

We have negotiated with an Australia bank a construction line of credit on our Indooroopilly property of $6.9 million (AUS$8.7 million) which, upon completion of the development project, converts to a term loan of up to $8.3 million (AUS$10.5 million). As of September 30, 2008, we have drawn $1.9 million (AUS$2.3 million) on this credit facility.

GE Capital Term Loan

In connection with the Consolidated Entertainment acquisition described in Note 19 - - Acquisitions, on February 21, 2008, Consolidated Amusement Theatres, Inc., (now renamed Consolidated Entertainment, Inc.) as borrower (“Borrower”), and Consolidated Amusement Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) entered into a Credit Agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE”) as lender and administrative agent, and GE Capital Markets, Inc. as lead arranger, which provides Borrower with a senior secured credit facility of up to $55.0 million in the aggregate, including a revolving credit facility of up to $5.0 million and a $1.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit (the “Credit Facility”). The initial borrowings under the Credit Facility were used to finance, in part, our acquisition of the theaters and other assets described in Note 17 - Acquisitions. We may borrow additional amounts under the Credit Facility for other acquisitions as permitted under the Credit Facility (and to pay any related transaction expenses), and for ordinary working capital and general corporate needs of Borrower, subject to the terms of the Credit Facility. We incurred deferred financing costs of $2.6 million related to our borrowings under this Credit Facility. The Credit Facility expires on February 21, 2013 and is secured by substantially all the assets of Borrower and Holdings.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either (i) the Index Rate (defined as the higher of the Wall Street Journal prime rate and the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points), or (ii) LIBOR (as defined in the Credit Facility), at the election of Borrower, plus, in each case, a margin determined by reference to Borrower's Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) that ranges between prime rate plus 2.00% and prime rate plus 2.75%, and between LIBOR plus 3.25% and LIBOR plus 4.00%, respectively.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be prepaid at any time without penalty, subject to certain minimums and payment of any LIBOR funding breakage costs. Borrower will be required to pay an unused commitment fee equal to 0.50% per annum on the actual daily-unused portion of the revolving loan facility, payable quarterly in arrears. Outstanding letters of credit under the Credit Facility are subject to a fee of the applicable LIBOR rate in effect per annum on the face amount of such letters of credit, payable quarterly in arrears. Borrower will be required to pay standard fees with respect to the issuance, negotiation, and amendment of letters of credit issued under the letter of credit facility. In accordance with the prepayment provisions of the credit agreement, during 2008, we paid down on the facility by $8.0 million. This includes a prepayment of the annual cash flow draw of $5.0 million and a pay down of the overall facility by an additional $3.0 million.

The Credit Facility contains other customary terms and conditions, including representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and indemnity provisions. Such covenants, among other things, limit Borrower's ability to incur indebtedness, incur liens or other encumbrances, make capital expenditures, enter into mergers, consolidations and asset sales, engage in transactions with affiliates, pay dividends or other distributions and change the nature of the business conducted by Borrower.

The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Borrower to maintain minimum fixed charge and interest coverage ratios and not to exceed specified maximum leverage ratios. The compliance levels for the maximum leverage and minimum interest coverage covenants become stricter over the term of the Credit Facility.

-17-

Table of Contents

The Credit Facility provides for customary events of default, including payment defaults, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain other indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, judgment defaults, invalidity of any loan documents or liens created under the Credit Agreement, change of control of Borrower, termination of certain theater leases and material inaccuracies in representations and warranties.

Liberty Theatres Term Loan

On March 17, 2008, we entered into a $7.1 million loan agreement with a financial institution, secured by our Royal George Theatre in Chicago, Illinois and our Minetta and Orpheum Theatres in New York. The loan has a 5-year term loan that accrues a 6.20% interest rate payable monthly in arrears. We incurred deferred financing costs of $527,000 related to our borrowings of this loan. The loan agreement requires only monthly principal and interest payments along with self-reported annual financial statements.

US Nationwide Loan 1

As described in greater detail in Note 19 – Acquisitions, on February 22, 2008, we acquired 15 motion picture theaters and theater-related assets from Pacific Theatres Exhibition Corp. and its affiliates (collectively, the “Sellers”) for $70.2 million. The Seller’s affiliate, Nationwide Theatres Corp (“Nationwide”), provided $21.0 million of acquisition financing evidenced by a five-year promissory note (the “Nationwide Note 1”) of Reading Consolidated Holdings, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary (“RCHI”), maturing on February 21, 2013. The Nationwide Note 1 bears interest (i) as to $8.0 million of principal at the annual rates of 7.50% for the first three years and 8.50% thereafter and (ii) as to $13.0 million of principal at the annual rates of 6.50% through July 31, 2009 and 8.50% thereafter. Accrued interest is due and payable on February 21, 2011 and thereafter on the last day of each calendar quarter, commencing on June 30, 2011. The entire principal amount is due and payable upon maturity, subject to our right to prepay at any time without premium or penalty and to the requirement that, under certain circumstances, we make mandatory prepayments equal to a portion of free cash flow generated by the acquired theaters. The loan is recourse only to RCHI and its assets, which include all of the Hawaii theaters and certain of the California theaters acquired from the Sellers and our Manville and Dallas Angelika Theaters.

The Nationwide Note 1 is subject to certain adjustments. To date, these adjustments have resulted in a net reduction of $3.3 million in the principal amount of the $8.0 million portion of the note, comprised of a reduction in the amount of $6.3 million and an additional advance of $3.0 million (such advance being used to pay down the GE Capital Term Loan discussed above).

US Nationwide Loan 2

In connection with the acquisition, the Sellers also committed to loan to RDI up to $3.0 million in two draws of $1.5 million each, one of which was drawn on July 21, 2008 and the other of which may be drawn on or before July 31, 2009. This loan bears an interest rate of 8.50%, compounded annually, and is due and payable, in full, on February 21, 2011, subject to our right to prepay the loan without premium or penalty.

-18-

Table of Contents

Note 12 – Other Liabilities

Other liabilities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2008		December 31, 2007
Current liabilities
Security deposit payable	$	202	$	175
Other		--		(6	)
Other current liabilities	$	202	$	169
Other liabilities
Foreign withholding taxes	$	5,681	$	5,480
Straight-line rent liability		5,135		3,783
Option liability		948		--
Environmental reserve		1,656		1,656
Accrued pension		2,915		2,626
Other		1,319		1,391
Other liabilities	$	17,654	$	14,936

Included in our other liabilities are accrued pension costs of $2.9 million. Associated with our pension plans, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $63,000 and $289,000, respectively, of interest cost and $71,000 and $214,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized $39,000 and $91,000, respectively, of interest cost and $76,000 and $177,000, respectively, of amortized prior service cost.

Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies

Unconsolidated Debt and Construction Commitments

Total debt of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities was $3.0 million and $4.2 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Our share of unconsolidated debt, based on our ownership percentage, was $989,000 and $2.0 million as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. This debt is without recourse to Reading as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

Associated with the development of our Indooroopilly, Brisbane, Australia property, we have entered into a construction agreement related to its redevelopment. Obligations under this agreement are contingent upon the completion of the services within the guidelines specified in the agreement. At September 30, 2008, we had $3.6 million (AU$4.6 million) in outstanding obligations for this contract, which we believe will be settled in the next twelve months.

Litigation

Whitehorse Center Litigation

On May 10, 2005, a mixed judgment was entered by the trial court in Reading Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd vs. Burstone Victoria Pty Ltd. Appeal rights have been exhausted and the net result of that judgment has been the payment to us by the defendants during the 2008 first quarter of $830,000 (AUS$901,000) and $314,000 (AUS$333,000) during the 2008 second quarter which are each included in other income.

-19-

Table of Contents

Botany Downs Cinema Litigation

This litigation was resolved by our sale, on June 6, 2008, of the Botany Downs Cinema to our joint venture partner for $3.3 million (NZ$4.3 million) resulting in a gain of $2.5 million (NZ$3.2 million) (see Note 7 - Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Entities).

Condrens Litigation

On May 13, 2008, the High Court of Wellington rendered a decision against the liquidators of Condrens Parking Limited and in favor of Aeneas Edward O’Sullivan, Mark Gerard McKinley, and Clifford Joseph Condrens in the matter titled Palmer and Petterson v. O’Sullivan et al. Reading New Zealand Ltd was the majority creditor of Condrens Parking Ltd, and, as such, financially supported the liquidator, Palmer and Petterson, in this case. Because of this determination, the defendants are claiming costs of approximately $290,000 (NZ$381,000). No amount has been accrued for this as of September 30, 2008. We have appealed this decision, and are contesting the defendants’ cost claims.

Tax Audit/Litigation

On September 11, 2008, we advised the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) that we would no longer be contesting the $349,000 deficiency assessment made with respect to Reading Entertainment, Inc (one of our wholly owned subsidiaries) for the tax years 1997, 1998, and 1999. As one of the results of this decision will be a refund of $760,000 of alternative minimum tax paid in 1996, the net result of this conclusion will be a net refund to us of previously paid Federal Income Taxes. The major portion of the currently outstanding litigation between Craig Corporation (another of our wholly owned subsidiaries) remains ongoing, and is in the discovery phase. This portion of the litigation relates to the treatment of the contribution to Reading Entertainment, Inc. by Craig Corporation of Stater Bros. Stock, the contribution of those shares to our Australian subsidiary and the eventual repurchase of those shares by Stater Bros. This litigation is described in greater detail in our Annual Report of Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Note 14 – Minority Interest

Minority interest is composed of the following enterprises:

50% of membership interest in Angelika Film Centers LLC (“AFC LLC”) owned by a subsidiary of iDNA, Inc.;

25% minority interest in Australia Country Cinemas Pty Ltd (“ACC”) owned by Panorama Cinemas for the 21st Century Pty Ltd.;

33% minority interest in the Elsternwick Joint Venture owned by Champion Pictures Pty Ltd.;

Up to 27.5% incentive interest in certain property holding trusts established by LPP (see Note 2, above);

25% minority interest in the Sutton Hill Properties, LLC owned by Sutton Hill Capital, L.L.C.; and

20% minority interest in Big 4 Farming, LLC by Cecelia Packing Corporation.

-20-

Table of Contents

The components of minority interest are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007
AFC LLC	$	1,956		$	2,256
Australian Country Cinemas		174			232
Elsternwick Unincorporated Joint Venture		131			145
LPP Property Trusts		112			237
Sutton Hill Properties		(85	)		(36	)
Other (Big 4 Farming)		--			1
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries	$	2,288		$	2,835

	Expense for the Three Months Ended September 30,						Expense for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
AFC LLC	$	198		$	130		$	300		$	458
Australian Country Cinemas		58			18			116			71
Elsternwick Unincorporated Joint Venture		8			16			27			34
LPP Property Trusts		(165	)		59			(74	)		155
Sutton Hill Properties		(14	)		(61	)		(124	)		(61	)
Other (Big 4 Farming)		--			--			1			--
Minority interest	$	85		$	162		$	246		$	657

Note 15 – Common Stock

Employee Stock Grants

On August 21, 2008, as part of their executive compensation, 37,388 shares of fully vested restricted Class A Non-Voting Common Stock was granted to three of our executives as stock bonuses having a grant date fair value of $286,000. As of September 30, 2008, these shares have yet to be issued to them and the executives have the option to accept the shares or to receive a reduced cash payment in lieu of shares.

Note 16 - Comprehensive Income (Loss)

U.S. GAAP requires that the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and/or losses on securities that are available-for-sale (“AFS”) be classified as comprehensive income (loss). The following table sets forth our comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

-21-

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net income (loss)	$	(2,061	)	$	870		$	(2,006	)	$	1,858
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		(27,978	)		1,948			(21,210	)		14,365
Accrued pension		71			76			214			(2,524	)
Realized gain on AFS securities		--			(549	)		--			(773	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS securities		(6	)		(880	)		(2	)		82
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(29,974	)	$	1,465		$	(23,004	)	$	13,008

Note 17 – Derivative Instruments

The following table sets forth the terms of our interest rate swap derivative instruments at September 30, 2008:

Type of Instrument	Notional Amount		Pay Fixed Rate		Receive Variable Rate		Maturity Date
Interest rate swap	$	21,736,000		6.4400%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	12,903,000		6.6800%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	9,623,000		5.8800%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	2,766,000		6.3600%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	2,766,000		6.9600%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	2,213,000		7.0000%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	1,098,000		7.1900%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	2,221,000		7.5900%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008
Interest rate swap	$	44,000,000		6.8540%		6.6975%	April 1, 2011
Interest rate swap	$	1,186,000		8.2500%		7.8883%	December 31, 2008

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”), we marked our interest rate swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet resulting in a $601,000 increase and a $215,000 decrease to interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and a $76,000 and $186,000 increase to interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we have recorded the fair market value of our interest rate swaps of $741,000 and $526,000, respectively, as an other noncurrent asset. In accordance with SFAS 133, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as financial reporting hedges.

As part of our GE Capital loan, we are required to swap 50% of our variable rate loan to fixed rate terms for a minimum period of two years. During April 2008, we entered into a swap contract starting with a maximum notional amount of $49.0 million to comply with this requirement. This notional swap balance is currently $44.0 million and is scheduled to reduce incrementally over the next two years until the balance reaches $28.0 million on January 1, 2011. The swap contract terminates on April 1, 2011.

-22-

Table of Contents

Note 18 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

			Book Value		Fair Value
Financial Instrument	Level		September 30, 2008		September 30, 2008
Investment in marketable securities		1	$	4,085	$	4,085
Interest rate swaps asset		2	$	741	$	741

SFAS 157 (see Note 1 – Basis of Presentation) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. As presented in the table above, the statement requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

We use appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of our assets and liabilities. When available, we measure fair value using Level 1 inputs because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value.

We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair values of the assets and liabilities in the table above.

Level 1 Fair Value Measurements – are based on market quotes of our marketable securities.

Level 2 Fair Value Measurements – Interest Rate Swaps – The fair value of interest rate swaps are estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward interest rate curves, which are corroborated by market data, and quotes obtained from counterparties to the agreements.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements – we do not have any assets or liabilities that fall into this category.

Note 19 – Acquisitions

Consolidated Entertainment Cinemas Acquisitions

In keeping with our business plan of being opportunistic in adding to our existing cinema portfolio, on February 22, 2008, we acquired 15 cinemas with 181 screens in Hawaii and California (the “Consolidated Entertainment” acquisition) from Pacific Theatres Exhibition Corp. and its affiliates (collectively, the “Sellers”) for $70.2 million. The purchase price was subsequently adjusted to $63.9 million as described below under post closing adjustments, which were applied to reduce the principal amount owed under financing provided by an affiliate of the Sellers (the “Nationwide Note 1”). The financing of the transaction included $48.4 million of debt from GE Capital, net of deferred financing costs of $1.6 million, a loan of $21.0 million as evidenced by the Nationwide Note 1, and $800,000 of cash from Reading (see Note 11 – Notes Payable for a more complete explanation of the GE debt and the Nationwide Note 1).

The theaters and assets are located in California and Hawaii. We acquired the theaters and other assets through certain special purpose entities formed by us for this purpose. The acquired assets consist primarily of the buildings and leasehold interests in fourteen of the theaters; a management agreement with the Sellers under which we will manage one other theater (but pursuant to which we effectively bear the risk and are entitled to the benefits associated with the ownership of that theater); and furniture, fixtures, equipment and miscellaneous inventory at the theaters. The theaters contain a total of 181 screens, which compares to 286 total screens

-23-

Table of Contents

owned or operated by us immediately prior to the acquisition. The leasehold interests have current terms ranging from approximately 2 to 12 years, subject in some cases to renewal options in our favor. The management agreement relating to the managed theater is for a term of approximately 4 years and entitles us to a management fee equal to the cash flow of the theater. These cinemas produced approximately an unaudited $78.0 million of gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The initial aggregate purchase price has now been adjusted down by $6.3 million to $63.9 million, and is subject to further additional adjustments based upon post-closing matters relating to the possible opening of competing theater projects in the vicinity of certain acquired theaters. These additional acquisition price reductions can range from $0 to as much as the full amount of the Nationwide Note 1 as adjusted to date, if all contingencies were met. Pursuant to the $6.3 million reduction in purchase price, the Nationwide Note 1 was correspondingly reduced by $6.3 million during the second quarter of 2008. The reduction in purchase price results in a permanent reduction in the original $21.0 million debt obligation to $14.7 million at September 30, 2008. This loan was subsequently increased by $3.0 million in accordance with the Sales and Purchase Agreement of Consolidated Entertainment (see Note 11 – Notes Payable).

We have made preliminary estimates of the value of the assets acquired from this acquisition. These fair value estimates of the cinema assets acquired have been allocated to the acquired tangible assets, identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above and below-market leases, if any, based in each case on their respective fair values. Goodwill was recorded to the extent the purchase price including certain acquisition and close costs exceeded the preliminary fair value estimates of the net acquired assets. Once we have completed our estimates of fair value, which includes the pending completion of an appraisal of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition, we will have completed the purchase accounting for the assets and liabilities in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Our preliminary purchase price allocation is as follows:

Inventory	$	271
Prepaid assets		543
Property & Equipment:
Leasehold improvements		32,303
Furniture and equipment		7,030
Intangibles:
Trade name		7,220
Non-compete agreement		400
Below market leases		9,999
Goodwill		6,306
Trade payables		(123	)
Total Purchase Price	$	63,949

The unaudited pro forma results, assuming the above noted acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2007 for purposes of the 2008 and 2007 pro forma disclosures, are presented below. These unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include certain adjustments, such as increased depreciation and amortization expenses as a result of tangible and intangible assets acquired in the acquisition, as well as higher interest expense as a result of the debt incurred to finance the acquisition. These unaudited pro forma results do not purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2007 and may not be indicative of future operating results (dollars in thousands, except share data):

-24-

Table of Contents

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Revenue	$	56,528		$	53,438		$	151,817		$	147,553
Operating income		3,236			3,063			1,907			4,053
Net loss from continuing operations		(2,239	)		(55	)		(5,223	)		(5,552	)
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations		(0.10	)		0.00			(0.23	)		(0.25	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic		22,476,904			22,487,943			22,476,514			22,486,395
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – dilutive		22,476,904			22,487,943			22,476,514			22,486,395

Australia Properties

During the first quarter of 2008, we have acquired or entered into agreements to acquire four contiguous properties of approximately 50,000 square feet, which we intend to develop. The aggregate purchase price of these properties is $12.5 million (AUS$13.7 million), of which $2.5 million (AUS$2.8 million) relates to the three properties that have been acquired and $10.0 million (AUS$10.9 million) relates to the one property that is under contract to be acquired. Our obligation to close on the fourth property is subject to certain conditions (which we may waive) including a rezoning condition. We have made a $237,000 (AUS$300,000) deposit on this property.

Note 20 – Assets held for sale

In accordance with SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we report as discontinued operations real estate assets that meet the definition of a component of an entity and have been sold or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale under SFAS 144. We included all results of these discontinued operations, less applicable income taxes, in a separate component of operations on the consolidated statements of operations under the heading “discontinued operations.” This treatment resulted in reclassifications of the 2007 financial statement amounts to conform to the 2008 presentation.

On September 16, 2008, we entered into a sale option agreement to sell our Auburn real estate property and cinema for $28.5 million (AUS$36.0 million). The sale option agreement calls for an initial option payment of $948,000 (AUS$1.2 million), received on the agreement date, and four option installment payments of $316,000 (AUS$400,000), $316,000 (AUS$400,000), $316,000 (AUS$400,000), and $948,000 (AUS$1.2 million) payable over the subsequent 9 months. The option comes to term on November 1, 2009 at which time the balance of $25.6 million (AUS$32.4 million) is due and payable. At any time during the 13-month option, the buyer may decline to move further in the sale process resulting in a forfeiture of all previous option payments.

The assets of the Auburn real estate and cinema are as follows:

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
Assets
Land	$	8,371		$	9,294
Building		14,856			16,754
Equipment and fixtures		8,335			8,992
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(8,787	)		(9,098	)
Total assets held for sale	$	22,775		$	25,942

-25-

Table of Contents

The 2008 and 2007 quarterly results for the Auburn real estate and cinema are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Revenue	$	1,663	$	1,576	$	4,821	$	4,359
Operating expense		1,262		1,261		3,767		3,463
Depreciation and amortization expense		223		270		683		963
Operating income (loss)	$	178	$	45	$	371	$	(67	)

Note 21 – Subsequent Events

In October 2008, Prime Media of Australia announced that it is offering stock at ratio of 0.257 shares of Prime Media for each share of Broadcast Production Services (formerly Becker Group). We currently hold 12,768,106 shares of Broadcast Production Services. We are currently evaluating whether or not we will participate in this tender offering.

-26-

Table of Contents

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As Reading International, Inc. (RDI and collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries, “Reading” and “we,” “us” or “our”), our businesses consist primarily of:

the development, ownership, and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand; and

the development, ownership, and operation of retail and commercial real estate in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

We believe cinema exhibition to be a business that will likely continue to generate fairly consistent cash flows in the years ahead. This is based on our belief that people will continue to spend some reasonable portion of their entertainment dollar on entertainment outside of the home and that, when compared to other forms of outside the home entertainment, movies continue to be a popular and competitively priced option. In keeping with our business plan of being opportunistic in adding to our existing cinema portfolio, on February 22, 2008, we acquired 15 cinemas with 181 screens in Hawaii and California (the “Consolidated Entertainment” acquisition) and we continue to consider the acquisition of cinema assets currently being offered for sale in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Also, in April 2008 and in August 2008, we opened two leased cinemas in Rouse Hill and Dandenong, Australia with 9 and 6 screens, respectively. Nevertheless, we believe it is likely that, over the long term, we will be reinvesting the majority our free cash flow into our general real estate development activities. We anticipate that our cinema operations will continue as our main source of cash flow and will support our real estate oriented activities.

In short, while we do have operating company attributes, we see ourselves principally as a hard asset company and intend to add to shareholder value by building the value of our portfolio of tangible assets.

In addition, we may from time to time identify opportunities to expand our existing businesses and asset base, or to otherwise profit, through the acquisition of interests in other publicly traded companies, both in the United States and in the overseas jurisdictions in which we do business. At September 30, 2008, our investments in the securities of other public companies aggregated $4.1 million, based on the closing price of such securities on that date. We may also, in addition to our investment in various private cinema joint ventures, take positions in private companies.

We manage our worldwide cinema business under various different brands:

in the US, under the Reading, Angelika Film Center, Consolidated Theatres and City Cinemas brands;

in Australia, under the Reading brand; and

in New Zealand, under the Reading and Rialto brands.

At September 30, 2008, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 427 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 7 cinemas with 46 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens.

While remaining opportunistic in our acquisitions of cinema assets, our business plan going forward is to build-out our existing development properties and to seek out additional real estate development opportunities while continuing to use and judiciously expand our presence in the cinema exhibition and live theatre business, by identifying, developing, and acquiring cinema and live theatre properties when and where appropriate.

-27-

Table of Contents

We continue to acquire, to dispose of, or to reposition assets in accordance with our business plan. For a description of our acquisitions so far in 2008, see Note 19 – Acquisitions to our September 30, 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

As previously stated, with the purchase of the Consolidated Entertainment cinemas in February 2008 and the addition of our newly opened Rouse Hill and Dandenong cinemas in Australia, at September 30, 2008, we owned and operated 52 cinemas with 427 screens, had interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures and entities that own an additional 7 cinemas with 46 screens and managed 2 cinemas with 9 screens. Regarding real estate, we owned and operated during the period four ETRC’s that we have developed in Australia and New Zealand; owned the fee interests in four developed commercial properties in Manhattan and Chicago, all of which are improved with live theatres, which together comprise seven stages and, in two cases, ancillary retail and commercial space; owned the fee interests underlying one of our Manhattan cinemas and hold for development an additional seven parcels (aggregating approximately 123 acres) located principally in urbanized areas of Australia and New Zealand. Two of these parcels, Burwood and Moonee Ponds, comprise approximately 54 acres, and are in areas designated by the provincial government of Victoria, Australia as “major principal activity centres.” We are currently in the planning phases of their development.

Operating expense includes costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the cinemas and live theatres and the management of rental properties. Our year-to-year results of operation were principally impacted by the following:

the above mentioned acquisition on February 22, 2008 of 15 cinemas with 181 screens in Hawaii and California as part of the Consolidated Entertainment acquisition;

the acquisition in February 2007, of the long-term lease interest underlying our cinema in Sacramento, California; and

the fluctuation in the value of the Australian dollar vis-à-vis the US dollar resulting in a general increase in results of operations for the Australian operations for 2008 compared to 2007. The New Zealand dollar compared to US dollar relationship was basically flat between these dates.

Three months ended September 30, 2008	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	52,909	$	5,588	$	(1,969	)	$	56,528
Operating expense		43,734		2,253		(1,969	)		44,018
Depreciation & amortization		3,834		880		--			4,714
General & administrative expense		1,106		255		--			1,361
Segment operating income	$	4,235	$	2,200	$	--		$	6,435
Three months ended September 30, 2007	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	28,009	$	4,858	$	(1,790	)	$	31,077
Operating expense		21,831		2,044		(1,790	)		22,085
Depreciation & amortization		1,591		917		--			2,508
General & administrative expense		793		176		--			969
Segment operating income	$	3,794	$	1,721	$	--		$	5,515

-28-

Table of Contents

Reconciliation to consolidated net income (loss):	2008 Quarter			2007 Quarter
Total segment operating income	$	6,435		$	5,515
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		163			139
General and administrative expense		3,036			2,902
Operating income		3,236			2,474
Interest expense, net		(3,962	)		(2,277	)
Other income		(1,009	)		707
Minority interest		(85	)		(162	)
Income from discontinued operation		178			45
Income tax expense		(689	)		(501	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		270			584
Net income (loss)	$	(2,061	)	$	870

Nine months ended September 30, 2008	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	135,693	$	16,297	$	(4,518	)	$	147,472
Operating expense		114,115		6,139		(4,518	)		115,736
Depreciation & amortization		10,473		2,833		--			13,306
General & administrative expense		3,005		851		--			3,856
Segment operating income	$	8,100	$	6,474	$	--		$	14,574
Nine months ended September 30, 2007	Cinema		Real Estate		Intersegment Eliminations			Total
Revenue	$	76,825	$	14,205	$	(4,081	)	$	86,949
Operating expense		60,959		5,462		(4,081	)		62,340
Depreciation & amortization		4,909		2,645		--			7,554
General & administrative expense		2,317		763		--			3,080
Segment operating income	$	8,640	$	5,335	$	--		$	13,975

Reconciliation to consolidated net income (loss):	2008 Nine Months			2007 Nine Months
Total segment operating income	$	14,574		$	13,975
Non-segment:
Depreciation and amortization expense		523			416
General and administrative expense		10,137			8,344
Operating income		3,914			5,215
Interest expense, net		(9,832	)		(5,978	)
Other income		2,033			250
Minority interest		(246	)		(657	)
Gain on sale of a discontinued operation		--			1,912
Income (loss) from discontinued operation		371			(67	)
Income tax expense		(1,513	)		(1,443	)
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities		817			2,626
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity		2,450			--
Net income (loss)	$	(2,006	)	$	1,858

-29-

Table of Contents

Cinema

Included in the cinema segment above is revenue and expense from the operations of 52 cinema complexes with 427 screens during the 2008 Quarter and 35 cinema complexes with 231 screens during the 2007 Quarter. The following tables detail our cinema segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	United States			Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	19,035		$	13,879	$	4,231	$	37,145
Concessions revenue		7,382			4,551		1,190		13,123
Advertising and other revenues		1,823			592		226		2,641
Total revenues		28,240			19,022		5,647		52,909

Cinema costs		23,390			13,417		4,252		41,059
Concession costs		1,378			983		314		2,675
Total operating expense		24,768			14,400		4,566		43,734

Depreciation and amortization		2,702			705		427		3,834
General & administrative expense		801			301		4		1,106
Segment operating income (loss)	$	(31	)	$	3,616	$	650	$	4,235

Three Months Ended September 30, 2007	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	4,537	$	11,002	$	4,721	$	20,260
Concessions revenue		1,376		3,643		1,387		6,406
Advertising and other revenues		597		527		219		1,343
Total revenues		6,510		15,172		6,327		28,009

Cinema costs		4,774		10,949		4,683		20,406
Concession costs		263		795		367		1,425
Total operating expense		5,037		11,744		5,050		21,831

Depreciation and amortization		487		668		436		1,591
General & administrative expense		483		308		2		793
Segment operating income	$	503	$	2,452	$	839	$	3,794

Cinema revenue increased for the 2008 Quarter by $24.9 million or 88.9% compared to the same period in 2007. The 2008 Quarter increase was primarily a result of $21.1 million of revenue from our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas and improved results from our Australia operations including $2.9 million from admissions and $973,000 from concessions and other revenues, offset by lower cinema revenues from our New Zealand operations of $680,000.

Operating expense increased for the 2008 Quarter by $21.9 million or 100.3% compared to the same period in 2007. This increase followed the aforementioned increase in revenues. Overall, our operating expenses as a ratio to gross revenue increased from 77.9% to 82.7% for the 2007 and 2008 Quarters, respectively. This increase in cinema costs was driven by the US and primarily related to higher film rent expense associated with our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas whose film product is primarily wide release films resulting in higher film rent cost compared to our predominately pre-acquisition art cinemas in the United States, which generally have lower film rent costs.

-30-

Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2008 Quarter by $2.2 million or 141.0% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas.

General and administrative costs increased for the 2008 Quarter by $313,000 or 39.5% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to the purchase and operations of our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas and legal matters associated with our cinema assets.

For our statement of operations, Australia and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates have increased by 4.6% and decreased by 4.2%, respectively, since 2007, which had an impact on the individual components of our income statement. However, the overall effect of the foreign currency change on operating income was minimal.

Because of the above, cinema segment income increased for the 2008 Quarter by $442,000 compared to the same period in 2007.

The following tables detail our cinema segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008	United States			Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	47,279		$	36,943	$	11,836	$	96,058
Concessions revenue		18,315			12,189		3,423		33,927
Advertising and other revenues		3,269			1,774		665		5,708
Total revenues		68,863			50,906		15,924		135,693

Cinema costs		56,685			37,836		12,401		106,922
Concession costs		3,620			2,687		886		7,193
Total operating expense		60,305			40,523		13,287		114,115

Depreciation and amortization		6,906			2,211		1,356		10,473
General & administrative expense		2,097			889		19		3,005
Segment operating income (loss)	$	(445	)	$	7,283	$	1,262	$	8,100

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007	United States			Australia		New Zealand		Total
Admissions revenue	$	13,639		$	30,335	$	12,119	$	56,093
Concessions revenue		3,900			9,676		3,512		17,088
Advertising and other revenues		1,430			1,563		651		3,644
Total revenues		18,969			41,574		16,282		76,825

Cinema costs		13,678			31,035		12,412		57,125
Concession costs		763			2,156		915		3,834
Total operating expense		14,441			33,191		13,327		60,959

Depreciation and amortization		1,465			2,167		1,277		4,909
General & administrative expense		1,554			759		4		2,317
Segment operating income	$	1,509		$	5,457	$	1,674	$	8,640

Cinema revenue increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $58.9 million or 76.6% compared to the same period in 2007. The 2008 Nine Months increase was primarily a result of $49.0 million of revenue from our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas and improved results from our Australia operations including $6.3 million from admissions and $2.6 million from concessions and other revenues, offset by New Zealand.

-31-

Table of Contents

Operating expense increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $53.2 million or 87.2% compared to the same period in 2007. This increase followed the aforementioned increase in revenues. Overall, our operating expenses as a ratio to gross revenue increased from 79.3% to 84.1% for the 2007 and 2008 Nine Months, respectively. The increase was primarily driven by the same factor that drove the 2008 Quarter, above.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $5.6 million or 113.3% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas being added during the 2008 Nine Months.

General and administrative costs increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $688,000 or 29.7% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas. The increase was primarily driven by the same factor that drove the 2008 Quarter, above.

For our statement of operations, Australia and New Zealand annual average exchange rates have increased by 11.0% and 4.5%, respectively, since 2007, which had a favorable impact on the individual components of the income statement. However, the overall effect of the foreign currency change on operating income was minimal.

Because of the above, cinema segment income decreased for the 2008 Nine Months by $540,000 compared to the same period in 2007.

Real Estate

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	United States			Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theatre rental and ancillary income	$	641		$	--	$	--	$	641
Property rental income		1,127			1,920		1,900		4,947
Total revenues		1,768			1,920		1,900		5,588

Live theatre costs		376			--		--		376
Property rental cost		832			594		451		1,877
Total operating expense		1,208			594		451		2,253

Depreciation and amortization		90			403		387		880
General & administrative expense		(1	)		243		13		255
Segment operating income	$	471		$	680	$	1,049	$	2,200

-32-

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2007	United States		Australia		New Zealand			Total
Live theatre rental and ancillary income	$	657	$	--	$	--		$	657
Property rental income		723		1,589		1,889			4,201
Total revenues		1,380		1,589		1,889			4,858

Live theatre costs		455		--		--			455
Property rental cost		435		523		631			1,589
Total operating expense		890		523		631			2,044

Depreciation and amortization		96		386		435			917
General & administrative expense		--		186		(10	)		176
Segment operating income	$	394	$	494	$	833		$	1,721

Real estate revenue increased for the 2008 Quarter by $730,000 or 15.0% compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily related to rental revenues from our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas that have ancillary real estate associated with them.

Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2008 Quarter by $209,000 or 10.2% compared to the same period in 2007. This increase in expense was primarily related to our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas that have ancillary real estate coupled with increasing utility and other operating costs primarily in our US properties.

Depreciation expense for the real estate segment decreased slightly by $37,000 or 4.0% for the 2008 Nine Months compared to the same period in 2007.

General and administrative costs increased for the 2008 Quarter by $79,000 or 44.9% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to an increase in administrative activities associated with our properties in Australia.

For our statement of operations, Australia and New Zealand quarterly average exchange rates have increased by 4.6% and decreased by 4.2%, respectively, since 2007, which had an impact on the individual components of the income statement. However, the overall effect of the foreign currency change on operating income was minimal.

As a result of the above, real estate segment income increased for the 2008 Quarter by $479,000 compared to the same period in 2007.

-33-

Table of Contents

The following tables detail our real estate segment operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theatre rental and ancillary income	$	2,695	$	--	$	--	$	2,695
Property rental income		2,051		5,888		5,663		13,602
Total revenues		4,746		5,888		5,663		16,297

Live theatre costs		1,450		--		--		1,450
Property rental cost		1,555		1,765		1,369		4,689
Total operating expense		3,005		1,765		1,369		6,139

Depreciation and amortization		271		1,244		1,318		2,833
General & administrative expense		13		763		75		851
Segment operating income	$	1,457	$	2,116	$	2,901	$	6,474

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007	United States		Australia		New Zealand		Total
Live theatre rental and ancillary income	$	2,385	$	--	$	--	$	2,385
Property rental income		1,631		5,014		5,175		11,820
Total revenues		4,016		5,014		5,175		14,205

Live theatre costs		1,465		--		--		1,465
Property rental cost		997		1,517		1,483		3,997
Total operating expense		2,462		1,517		1,483		5,462

Depreciation and amortization		286		1,116		1,243		2,645
General & administrative expense		14		624		125		763
Segment operating income	$	1,254	$	1,757	$	2,324	$	5,335

Real estate revenue increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $2.1 million or 14.7% compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily related to real estate associated with our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas, higher rental revenues from the majority of our Australia tenancies, and our newly acquired properties in New Zealand. Also, revenue from our domestic live theatre operations was higher than the same period in 2007.

Operating expense for the real estate segment increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $677,000 or 12.4% compared to the same period in 2007. This increase in expense was primarily related to our newly acquired Consolidated Entertainment cinemas that have ancillary real estate coupled with increasing utility and other operating costs primarily in our U.S. properties.

Depreciation expense for the real estate segment increased by $188,000 or 7.1% for the 2008 Nine Months compared to the same period in 2007.

General and administrative costs increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $88,000 or 11.5% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily related to an increase in administrative activities associated with our properties in Australia.

-34-

Table of Contents

As a result of the above, real estate segment income increased for the 2008 Nine Months by $1.1 million compared to the same period in 2007.

Corporate

General and administrative expense includes expenses that are not directly attributable to other operating segments. General and administrative expense increased by $134,000 in the 2008 Quarter compared to the 2007 Quarter and by $1.8 million in the 2008 Nine Months compared to the 2007 Nine Months. These increases are primarily related to additional pension costs in 2008 for our Chief Operating Officer; cost related to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan; and legal and professional fees associated principally with our real estate investment activities.

Net interest expense increased by $1.7 million and by $3.9 million for the 2008 Quarter and the 2008 Nine Months, respectively, compared to last year primarily related to higher outstanding loan balances during the 2008 compared to 2007 associated with our current year’s acquisitions.

Other income decreased by approximately $1.7 million and increased by $1.8 million for the 2008 Quarter and the 2008 Nine Months, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. The quarterly decrease was primarily related to a $1.0 million property impairment expense in 2008 and a $549,000 gain on sale of marketable securities in 2007 that was not repeated in 2008. The nine month increase related to the aforementioned property impairment expense of $1.0 million, Burstone litigation settlement receipts totaling $1.2 million, insurance proceeds of $910,000 related to damage caused by Hurricane George in 1998 to one of our previously owned cinemas in Puerto Rico, recovered credit card losses of $385,000, offset by a $950,000 mark-to-market expense in 2007 and a $549,000 gain on sale of marketable securities in 2007 both of which were not repeated in 2008. The mark-to-market expense related to our option liability for the option held by Sutton Hill Capital, LLC to acquire a 25% non-managing membership interest in our Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property, which was subsequently exercised by Sutton Hill Capital in the second quarter of 2007.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, upon the fulfillment of our commitment, we recorded the release of a deferred gain on the sale of a discontinued operation of $1.9 million associated with a previously sold property.

Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures and entities decreased by approximately $314,000 and $1.8 million for the 2008 Quarter and the 2008 Nine Months, respectively compared to the same periods last year. The decrease is primarily related to the changing sales activity in our investment related to the 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC, that has now completed the development of its residential condominium complex in midtown Manhattan called Place 57. During 2007 and 2006, all of the residential condominiums were sold and only the retail condominium is still available for sale. During 2007, the limited liability company closed on the sale of one and eight condominiums during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, resulting in gross sales of $3.4 million and $26.0 million, respectively, and equity earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures and entities to us of $201,000 and $1.6 million, respectively.

In addition to the aforementioned equity earnings, during the 2008 Nine Months, we recorded a gain on sale of unconsolidated entity of $2.5 million (NZ$3.2 million), from the sale of our interest in the cinema at Botany Downs, New Zealand.

-35-

Table of Contents

Consolidated Net Income/Losses

During 2008, we recorded net loss of $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the 2008 Quarter and 2008 Nine Months, respectively. During 2007, we recorded a net income of $870,000 and $1.9 million for the 2007 Quarter and 2007 Nine Months, respectively. As noted above, the decrease in earnings is primarily related to increased interest, depreciation, amortization, impairment, and litigation expenses partially offset by improved operating results from both our cinema (driven primarily by our acquisition of the Consolidated Entertainment cinemas) and our real estate segments and other one-time expense and income items noted above.

Acquisitions

Consolidated Entertainment Cinemas

On February 22, 2008, we completed the acquisition of fifteen motion picture exhibition theaters and theater-related assets from Pacific Theatres Exhibition Corp. and its affiliates (collectively, the “Sellers”) for $70.2 million. The purchase price has been subsequently reduced to $63.9 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 due to the settlement of a contingency in the purchase and sales agreement. The cinemas, which are located in the United States, contain 181 screens with annual revenue of approximately $78.0 million. The acquisition was made through certain wholly owned subsidiaries of RDI and was financed principally by a combination of debt financing from GE Capital Corporation and financing provided by an affiliate of the Sellers. For a more detailed description of this acquisition, see Note 19 – Acquisitions.

Australia Properties

Since the close of 2007, we have acquired or entered into agreements to acquire approximately 50,000 square foot of property in Australia, comprising four contiguous properties, which we intend to develop. The aggregate purchase price of these properties is $12.5 million (AUS$13.7 million), of which $2.5 million (AUS$2.8 million) relates to the three properties that have been acquired and $10.0 million (AUS$10.9 million) relates to the one property that is still under contract which is subject to certain rezoning conditions. Our obligation to close on the fourth property is subject to certain conditions (which we may waive) including a rezoning condition.

Business Plan, Capital Resources, and Liquidity

Business Plan

Our cinema exhibition business plan is to continue to identify, develop, and acquire cinema properties, where reasonably available, that allow us to leverage our cinema expertise and technology over a larger operating base. Our real estate business plan is to continue to develop our existing land assets, focusing principally on uses that incorporate entertainment elements such as cinemas, to continue to be sensitive to opportunities to convert our entertainment assets to higher and better uses, or, when appropriate, dispose of such assets. In addition, we will actively seek out potential real estate sites in Australia and New Zealand that show profitable redevelopment opportunities.

-36-

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled principal repayments of our secured debt and lease obligations at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		Thereafter
Long-term debt	$	293	$	1,234	$	10,064	$	82,716	$	16,012	$	64,988
Notes payable to related parties		--		--		14,000		--		--		--
Subordinated notes		--		--		--		--		--		51,547
Pension liability		1		10		15		20		25		2,370
Lease obligations		6,340		25,394		24,978		24,444		22,927		107,801
Estimated interest on long-term debt		4,456		17,710		13,972		13,564		9,279		58,340
Total	$	11,090	$	44,348	$	63,029	$	120,744	$	48,243	$	285,046

Estimated interest on long-term debt is based on the anticipated loan balances for future periods calculated against current fixed and variable interest rates.

We adopted FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes on January 1, 2007. As of adoption, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions was $12.5 million increasing to $14.4 million as of September 30, 2008. We do not expect a significant tax payment related to these obligations within the 12 months.

Associated with our development of the Indooroopilly property, we have entered into a construction agreement related to its redevelopment and development activities. Obligations under these agreements are contingent upon the completion of the services within the guidelines specified in the agreement. At September 30, 2008, we had $3.6 million (AU$4.6 million) in outstanding obligations for this contract, which we believe will be settled in the next twelve months.

Unconsolidated Debt

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations (including contingent obligations) that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in the financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Currency Risk

A significant portion of our business is conducted in Australia and New Zealand, and as such, we are subject to currency risk. Set forth below is a chart indicating the various exchange rates at certain points in time for the Australian and New Zealand Dollar vis-à-vis the US Dollar over the past 20 years.

We do not engage in currency hedging activities. Rather, to the extent possible, we operate our Australian and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis. Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies. As a result, the majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand have been procured in local currencies. Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand and our historic practice of funding our asset growth through local borrowings, our revenues are not yet significantly greater than our operating expenses and interest charges in these countries. The resulting natural operating hedge has led, historically, to a negligible foreign currency effect on our net earnings. However, with the reductions in our New Zealand and Australia debt as a result of the application of the proceeds of the US subordinated debt placement in the first quarter of 2007, we have virtually eliminated all interest expense in New Zealand and reduced our borrowings in Australia while increasing the interest payments which must be made in US Dollars, which will likely increase the impact of currency fluctuations on our net earnings. Also as a result of our decision to use US debt to pay off certain New Zealand debt and to reduce our Australian debt, foreign currency will likely have a more significant effect on the value of our assets and liabilities than during periods when we had a closer matching of our overseas assets and liabilities, with fluctuations noted in other comprehensive income. As we continue to progress with our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, the effect of variations in currency values will likely increase. Continued strengthening of the US Dollar vis-à-vis the Australian and New Zealand Dollar will continue to adversely impact both our net income and our net asset value. In the mean time, we continue to monitor the situation, including without limitation the impact of these currency declines on our various debt covenants.

-37-

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our obligations and commitments drives our liquidity position. This is further affected by our ability to obtain adequate, reasonable financing and/or to convert non-performing or non-strategic assets into cash. We cannot separate liquidity from capital resources in achieving our long-term goals in order to meet our debt servicing requirements.

Currently, our liquidity needs arise mainly from:

working capital requirements;

debt servicing requirements; and

capital expenditures, centered on obtaining the right financing for the development of our Burwood property.

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operations was $15.8 million in the 2008 Nine Months compared to $13.5 million for the 2007 Nine Months. The increase in cash provided by operations of $2.3 million is due primarily to:

increased cinema operational cash flow primarily from our Australia and domestic acquisition operations;

increased real estate operational cash flow predominately from our Australia and New Zealand operations; and

one time cash receipts related to litigation and other claims of $2.5 million;

offset by

a decrease in distributions from predominately our Place 57 joint venture (the assets of which have now been substantially monetized) of $4.0 million.

-38-

Table of Contents

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities for the 2008 Nine Months increased by $31.1 million to $63.3 million from $32.2 million compared to the same period in 2007. The $63.3 million cash used for the 2008 Nine Months was primarily related to:

$49.2 million to purchase the assets of the Consolidated Cinemas circuit;

$2.5 million to purchase real estate assets acquired through LPP; and

$18.4 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;

offset by

$2.0 million of deposit returned upon acquisition of the Consolidated Cinema circuit;

$1.1 million of sale option proceeds for our Auburn property;

$910,000 of proceeds from insurance settlement; and

$3.3 million of cash received from the sale of our interest in the Botany Downs cinema in New Zealand.

The $32.2 million cash used for the 2007 Nine Months was primarily related to:

$15.5 million to purchase marketable securities;

$20.6 million to purchase real estate assets including $20.1 million for real estate purchases in New Zealand, $100,000 for the purchase of the Cinemas 1, 2, & 3 building, and $493,000 for the purchase of the ground lease of our Tower Cinema in Sacramento, California;

$1.1 million in property enhancements to our existing properties;

$16.2 million in development costs associated with our properties under development; and

$1.5 million in our investment in Reading International Trust I securities (the issuer of our Trust Preferred Securities);

offset by

$19.9 million in cash provided by the sale of marketable securities; and

$2.2 million in distributions from our investment in joint ventures.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the 2008 Nine Months increased by $20.2 million to $54.3 million from $34.1 million compared to the same period in 2007. The $54.3 million in cash provided in the 2008 Nine Months was primarily related to:

$48.0 million of net proceeds from our new GE Capital Term Loan used to finance the Consolidated Entertainment transaction;

$6.6 million of net proceeds from our new Liberty Theatres loan;

$4.5 million of borrowing on the Nationwide Loans; and

$4.7 million of borrowing on our Australia credit facilities;

offset by

$8.7 million of loan repayments including $8.4 million to pay down on our GE Capital loan; and

-39-

Table of Contents

$788,000 in distributions to minority interests.

The $34.1 million in cash provided in the 2007 Nine Months was primarily related to:

$49.9 million of net proceeds from our new Trust Preferred Securities;

$14.4 million of net proceeds from our new Euro-Hypo loan;

$3.1 million of proceeds from our margin account on marketable securities; and

$26.4 million of borrowing on our Australia and New Zealand credit facilities;

offset by

$55.8 million of cash used to retire bank indebtedness including $34.4 million (NZ$50.0 million) to pay off our New Zealand term debt, $5.8 million (AUS$7.4 million) to retire a portion of our bank indebtedness in Australia, $3.1 million to pay off our margin account on marketable securities, and $12.1 million (NZ$15.7 million) to pay down our New Zealand Westpac line of credit in August 2007; and

$3.9 million in distributions to minority interests.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Securities and Exchange Commission defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, most important to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results of operations and the most demanding in their calls on judgment. Although accounting for our core business of cinema and live theatre exhibition with a real estate focus is relatively straightforward, we believe our most critical accounting policies relate to:

impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets;

tax valuation allowance and obligations; and

legal and environmental obligations.

These critical accounting policies are fully discussed in our 2007 Annual Report and you are advised to refer to that discussion.

Financial Risk Management

Our internally developed risk management procedure, seeks to minimize the potentially negative effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates on the results of operations. Our primary exposure to fluctuations in the financial markets is currently due to changes in foreign exchange rates between U.S and Australia and New Zealand, and interest rates.

As our operational focus continues to shift to Australia and New Zealand, unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses could materially affect our financial position. We currently manage our currency exposure by creating, whenever possible, natural hedges in Australia and New Zealand. This involves local country sourcing of goods and services as well as borrowing in local currencies. Currency fluctuations can impact our ability to satisfy our covenants under the Indenture entered into for the benefit of our Trust Preferred Securities, as our financial covenants related to net worth and asset value are denominated in US Dollars, and accordingly are adversely affected by declines in the value of the Australian Dollar and the New Zealand Dollar vis-à-vis the US Dollar.

-40-

Table of Contents

Our exposure to interest rate risk arises out of our long-term debt obligations. Consistent with our internally developed guidelines, we seek to reduce the negative effects of changes in interest rates by changing the character of the interest rate on our long-term debt, converting a variable rate into a fixed rate. Our internal procedures allow us to enter into derivative contracts on certain borrowing transactions to achieve this goal. Our Australian credit facilities provide for floating interest rates but require that not less than a certain percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations using the derivative contracts.

As part of our newly adopted GE Capital loan, we are required to swap 50% our variable rate loan to fixed rate terms for a minimum period of two years. During April 2008, we entered into a swap contract starting with a minimum notional amount of $49.0 million to comply with this requirement. This notional swap balance is currently $44.0 million and is scheduled to reduce incrementally over the next two years until the balance reaches $28.0 million on January 1, 2011. The swap contract terminates on April 1, 2011.

Inflation

We continually monitor inflation and the effects of changing prices. Inflation increases the cost of goods and services used. Competitive conditions in many of our markets restrict our ability to recover fully the higher costs of acquired goods and services through price increases. We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation by implementing continuous process improvement solutions to enhance productivity and efficiency and, as a result, lower costs and operating expenses. In our opinion, the effects of inflation have been managed appropriately and as a result, have not had a material impact on our operations and the resulting financial position or liquidity.

Litigation

We are currently, and are from time to time, involved with claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. Some examples of the types of claims are:

contractual obligations;

insurance claims;

IRS claims;

employment matters;

environmental matters; and

anti-trust issues.

Where we are the plaintiffs, we expense all legal fees on an on-going basis and make no provision for any potential settlement amounts until received. In Australia, the prevailing party is entitled to recover its attorneys fees, which typically works out to be approximately 60% of the amounts actually spent where first class legal counsel is engaged at customary rates. Where we are a plaintiff, we have likewise made no provision for the liability for the defendant’s attorneys' fees in the event we were determined not to be the prevailing party.

-41-

Table of Contents

Where we are the defendants, we accrue for probable damages, which may not be covered by insurance, as they become known and can be reasonably estimated. In our opinion, any claims and litigation in which we are currently involved are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. However, we do not give any assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such claims and litigation. The resolution of such claims and litigation could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending on the level of income for such period. There have been no material changes to our litigation exposure since our Company’s 2007 Annual Report, as updated by our filings on form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Forward-Looking Statements

Our statements in this interim quarterly report contain a variety of forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect only our expectations regarding future events and operating performance and necessarily speak only as of the date the information was prepared. No guarantees can be given that our expectation will in fact be realized, in whole or in part. You can recognize these statements by our use of words such as, by way of example, “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” and “anticipate” or other similar terminology.

These forward-looking statements reflect our expectation after having considered a variety of risks and uncertainties. However, they are necessarily the product of internal discussion and do not necessarily completely reflect the views of individual members of our Board of Directors or of our management team. Individual Board members and individual members of our management team may have different view as to the risks and uncertainties involved, and may have different views as to future events or our operating performance.

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying our forward-looking statements are the following:

·	With respect to our cinema operations:

o	The number and attractiveness to movie goers of the films released in future periods;

o	The amount of money spent by film distributors to promote their motion pictures;

o	The licensing fees and terms required by film distributors from motion picture exhibitors in order to exhibit their films;

o	The comparative attractiveness of motion pictures as a source of entertainment and willingness and/or ability of consumers (i) to spend their dollars on entertainment and (ii) to spend their entertainment dollars on movies in an outside the home environment;

The extent to which we encounter competition from other cinema exhibitors, from other sources of outside of the home entertainment, and from inside the home entertainment options, such as “home theaters” and competitive film product distribution technology such as, by way of example, cable, satellite broadcast, DVD and VHS rentals and sales, and so called “movies on demand;” and

o	The extent to and the efficiency with which, we are able to integrate acquisitions of cinema circuits with our existing operations.

·	With respect to our real estate development and operation activities:

o	The rental rates and capitalization rates applicable to the markets in which we operate and the quality of properties that we own;

-42-

Table of Contents

o	The extent to which we can obtain on a timely basis the various land use approvals and entitlements needed to develop our properties;

o	The risks and uncertainties associated with real estate development;

o	The availability and cost of labor and materials;

o	Competition for development sites and tenants;

o	Environmental remediation issues; and

o	The extent to which our cinemas can continue to serve as an anchor tenant which will, in turn, be influenced by the same factors as will influence generally the results of our cinema operations; and

·	With respect to our operations generally as an international company involved in both the development and operation of cinemas and the development and operation of real estate; and previously engaged for many years in the railroad business in the United States:

o	Our ongoing access to borrowed funds and capital and the interest that must be paid on that debt and the returns that must be paid on such capital;

o	The relative values of the currency used in the countries in which we operate;

o	Changes in government regulation, including by way of example, the costs resulting from the implementation of the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley;

o	Our labor relations and costs of labor (including future government requirements with respect to pension liabilities, disability insurance and health coverage, and vacations and leave);

Our exposure from time to time to legal claims and to uninsurable risks such as those related to our historic railroad operations, including potential environmental claims and health related claims relating to alleged exposure to asbestos or other substances now or in the future recognized as being possible causes of cancer or other health related problems;

o	Changes in future effective tax rates and the results of currently ongoing and future potential audits by taxing authorities having jurisdiction over our various companies; and

o	Changes in applicable accounting policies and practices.

The above list is not necessarily exhaustive, as business is by definition unpredictable and risky, and subject to influence by numerous factors outside of our control such as changes in government regulation or policy, competition, interest rates, supply, technological innovation, changes in consumer taste and fancy, weather, and the extent to which consumers in our markets have the economic wherewithal to spend money on beyond-the-home entertainment.

Given the variety and unpredictability of the factors that will ultimately influence our businesses and our results of operation, it naturally follows that no guarantees can be given that any of our forward-looking statements will ultimately prove to be correct. Actual results will undoubtedly vary and there is no guarantee as to how our securities will perform either when considered in isolation or when compared to other securities or investment opportunities.

Finally, please understand that we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any of our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable law. Accordingly, you should always note the date to which our forward-looking statements speak.

-43-

Table of Contents

Additionally, certain of the presentations included in this interim quarterly report may contain “non-GAAP financial measures.” In such case, a reconciliation of this information to our GAAP financial statements will be made available in connection with such statements.

-44-

Table of Contents

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that registrants include information about potential effects of changes in currency exchange and interest rates in their filings. Several alternatives, all with some limitations, have been offered. The following discussion is based on a sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates. This analysis is constrained by several factors, including the following:

It is based on a single point in time.

It does not include the effects of other complex market reactions that would arise from the changes modeled.

Although the results of such an analysis may be useful as a benchmark, they should not be viewed as forecasts.

At September 30, 2008, approximately 45% and 18% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand), respectively, including approximately $10.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2007, approximately 51% and 25% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand) including approximately $10.3 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible, in local currencies. As a result, a majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand have been procured in local currencies. Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and New Zealand, our revenue is not yet significantly greater than our operating expense. The resulting natural operating hedge has led to a somewhat negligible foreign currency effect on our current earnings. Although foreign currency has had a nominal effect on our current earnings, the effect of the translation adjustment on our assets and liabilities noted in our other comprehensive income was a decrease of $28.0 million and $21.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. As we continue to progress our acquisition and development activities in Australia and New Zealand, we cannot assure you that the foreign currency effect on our earnings will be insignificant in the future.

Historically, our policy has been to borrow in local currencies to finance the development and construction of our ETRC’s in Australia and New Zealand whenever possible. As a result, the borrowings in local currencies have provided somewhat of a natural hedge against the foreign currency exchange exposure. Even so, and as a result of our issuance of fully subordinated notes described below, approximately 45% and 93% of our Australian and New Zealand assets, respectively, remain subject to such exposure unless we elect to hedge our foreign currency exchange between the US and Australian and New Zealand dollars. If the foreign currency rates were to fluctuate by 10% the resulting change in Australian and New Zealand assets would be $7.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively, and the change in our quarterly net income would be $378,000 and $85,000, respectively. At the present time, we have no plan to hedge such exposure.

We record unrealized foreign currency translation gains or losses that could materially affect our financial position. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we have recorded a cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gain of approximately $27.0 million and $48.2 million, respectively.

Historically, we maintained most of our cash and cash equivalent balances in short-term money market instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Some of our money market investments may decline in value if interest rates increase. Due to the short-term nature of such investments, a change of 1% in short-term interest rates would not have a material effect on our financial condition.

-45-

Table of Contents

The majority of our U.S. loans have fixed interest rates; however, one of our domestic loans has a variable interest rate and a change of approximately 1% in short-term interest rates would have resulted in an approximately $13,000 increase or decrease in our 2008 Quarter interest expense.

While we have typically used fixed rate financing (secured by first mortgages) in the U.S., fixed rate financing is typically not available to corporate borrowers in Australia and New Zealand. The majority of our Australian and New Zealand bank loans have variable rates. The Australian facilities provide for floating interest rates, but require that not less than a certain percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations (see Financial Risk Management above). If we consider the interest rate swaps, a 1% increase in short-term interest rates would have resulted in approximately $81,000 increase in our 2008 Quarter Australian and New Zealand interest expense while a 1% decrease in short-term interest rates would have resulted in approximately $84,000 decrease the 2008 Quarter of Australian and New Zealand interest expense.

-46-

Table of Contents

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-47-

Table of Contents

PART II – Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

For a description of legal proceedings, please refer to Item 3 entitled Legal Proceedings contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as updated by our filings on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

For a description of the concession of the case of Reading Entertainment, Inc. against the IRS, see the Tax Audit/Litigation section within the Litigation section of Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies, above.

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

For a description of grants of stock to certain executives, see the Stock Based Compensation section under Note 2 – Stock-Based and Equity Compensation, above.

Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders

None.

Item 5 - Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6 - Exhibits

10.77	Form of Indemnity, as routinely granted to the Company’s officers and directors, filed herewith.
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
32	Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

-48-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date:	November 7, 2008	By:	/s/ James J. Cotter
			James J. Cotter
			Chief Executive Officer


Date:	November 7, 2008	By:	/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
			Andrzej Matyczynski
			Chief Financial Officer

-49-

exhibit10_77.htm

EXHIBIT 10.77

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

This Indemnification Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made this ___ day of _______________, 20__, between Reading International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and _______________, an individual (“Indemnitee”).

RECITALS

Whereas, Indemnitee is either a member of the board of directors of the Company (“Board” or “Board of Directors”) or an officer of the Company, or both, and in such capacity or capacities is performing a valuable service for the Company.

Whereas, the Corporation has adopted bylaws (“Bylaws”) providing for the indemnification of the officers, directors, employees and agents of the Company.

Whereas, the Bylaws and Nevada Revised Statute Section 78.751 (the “State Statute” specifically provide that they are not exclusive, and thereby contemplate that agreements may be entered into between the Company and the members of its Board of Directors and officers with respect to indemnification of such directors and officers.

Whereas, Indemnitee is willing to serve, continue to serve and to take on additional service for and on behalf of the Company on the condition that Indemnitee is indemnified as set forth in this Agreement.

Whereas, it is intended that Indemnitee shall be paid promptly by the Company all amounts necessary to effectuate in full the indemnity provided in this Agreement.

Whereas, to induce Indemnitee continue to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, or as an officer of the Company, or both, the Company has determined and agreed to enter into this Agreement with Indemnitee.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of Indemnitee’s continued service as a director or officer of the Company after the date hereof, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Indemnitee hereby agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Indemnification of Indemnitee. The Company hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by the provisions of the State Statute, or any successor statute or amendment thereof, or any other statutory provisions authorizing or permitting such indemnification that is adopted after the date of this Agreement.

2. Additional Indemnity. Subject only to the exclusions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement, the Company hereby further agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend Indemnitee:

(a) Against any and all expenses (including fees for attorneys, accountants, private investigators, court and transcript costs, fees and expenses of witnesses, travel expenses and all other like disbursements or expenses reasonably incurred by or for Indemnitee), judgments damages, fines, penalties, and amounts paid in settlement (including all interest assessments and other charges paid or payable in connection with or in respect of such judgment, fines, penalties, or amounts paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred by or for Indemnitee in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (including an action by or in the right of the Company)(a “Covered Action”) to which Indemnitee is made a party as a result of the fact that at the time of the act or omission which is the subject matter of such Covered Action the Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise; and

(b) Otherwise to the fullest extent as may be provided to Indemnitee by the Company under the non-exclusivity provisions of Article VII of the Bylaws of the Company and the State Statute.

3. Limitations on Additional Indemnity. No indemnity pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement shall be paid by the Company to the extent that:

(a) Payment is actually made to Indemnitee under a valid and collectible insurance policy or policies, except with respect to any excess beyond the amount of payment under such insurance policy or policies. Notwithstanding the availability of such insurance policy or policies, Indemnitee also may claim indemnification from the Company pursuant to this Agreement by assigning to the Company any claims under such insurance policy or policies to the extent Indemnitee is paid by the Company.

(b) Indemnitee is indemnified by the Company otherwise than pursuant to this Agreement.

(c) Judgment is rendered against Indemnitee for the payment of dividends or other distributions to stockholders of the Company in violation of the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes § 78.300, as amended.

(d) Judgment is rendered against Indemnitee for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale by Indemnitee of securities of the Company pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or other similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law.

(e) Indemnitee’s conduct giving rise to the claim for indemnification is finally adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been a breach of fiduciary duty which involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law.

(f) Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, in connection with all or any part of a suit or other proceeding which is initiated or maintained by or on behalf of Indemnitee, or any suit or other proceeding by Indemnitee against the Company or its directors, officers, employees or other agents, unless (i) such indemnification is expressly required to be made by Nevada law; (ii) the suit or other proceeding was expressly authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company in

writing or (iii) such indemnification is provided by the Company, in its sole discretion, pursuant to the powers vested in the Company under Nevada law.

4. Continuation of Indemnity. All agreements and obligations of the Company contained in this Agreement shall continue during the period Indemnitee is a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company (or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise) and shall continue thereafter so long as Indemnitee shall be subject to any possible claim or threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that Indemnitee was a director or officer of the Company, or both, or serving in any other capacity referred to in this Agreement.

5. Advancement of Expenses. In the event Indemnitee incurs costs or expenses in connection with the defense of any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding (including any costs or expenses incurred for any appeal therefore), the Company agrees to pay such costs or expenses as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding within 30 calendar days of submission of bills or vouchers for such costs or expenses upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of Indemnitee to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company. Indemnitee agrees to reimburse the Company for all amounts paid by the Company in defending any civil, criminal, administrative, investigative action, suit or proceeding against Indemnitee, including amounts paid in settlement, in the event and only to the extent that it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company for such expenses under the provisions of the State Statute, Bylaws, this Agreement or otherwise. In the case of an action brought by the Company for an accounting of profits made from the purchase or sale by Indemnitee of securities of the Company pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or other similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law, however, costs and expenses will not be advanced unless such action is approved by a majority of the directors of the Company who both hold office at the time of the commencement of such case and held office at the time of the conduct alleged to have given rise to liability on the part of the Indemnitee.

6. Presumptions and Effect on Certain Proceedings. Upon making a request for indemnification, Indemnitee shall be presumed to be entitled to indemnification under this Agreement. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, arbitration award, conviction or on a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not affect this presumption except as may be provided in Section 4 of this Agreement.

7. Notification and Defense of Claim. Promptly after receipt by Indemnitee of notice of the commencement of any action, suit or proceeding, Indemnitee shall, if a claim with respect thereto is to be made against the Company under this Agreement, notify the Company of the commencement of the same; but the failure by Indemnitee to notify the Company will not relieve the Company from any liability which it may have to Indemnitee otherwise than under this Agreement. With respect to any such action, suit or proceeding as to which Indemnitee notifies the Company of the commencement thereof:

(a) The Company shall be entitled to participate therein at its own expense; and

(b) Except as otherwise provided below, to the extent that it may wish, the

Company, jointly with any other indemnifying party similarly notified, shall be entitled to assume the defense thereof with counsel reasonably satisfactory to Indemnitee. After notice from the Company to Indemnitee of its election to assume the defense of the action, suit or proceeding, the Company will not be liable to Indemnitee under this Agreement for any legal or other expenses subsequently incurred by Indemnitee in connection with the defense thereof other than reasonable costs of investigation or as otherwise provided below. Indemnitee shall have the right to employ its own counsel in such action, suit or proceeding but the fees and expenses of such counsel incurred after notice from the Company of its assumption of the defense shall be at the sole expense of Indemnitee unless (i) the employment of counsel by Indemnitee has been authorized in writing by the Company; (ii) Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there my be a conflict of interest between the Company and Indemnitee in the conduct of the defense of such action; or (iii) the Company shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of such action, suit or proceeding. In each such instance set forth in (i)-(iii) above, the fees and expenses of Indemnitee’s counsel shall be at the expense of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not be entitled to assume the defense of any action, suit or proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Company or as to which Indemnitee shall have made the conclusion provided in (ii) above.

(c) The Company shall not be liable to indemnify Indemnitee under this Agreement for any amounts paid in settlement of any action or claim affected without the Company’s prior express written consent. The Company shall not settle any action or claim in any manner that would impose any penalty or limitation on Indemnitee without Indemnitee’s prior express written consent. Neither the Company nor Indemnitee will unreasonably withhold their consent to any proposed settlement.

8. Enforcement.

(a) The Company expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement and assumed the obligations imposed on the Company hereby in order to induce Indemnitee to continue as a director or officer of the Company, and acknowledges that Indemnitee is relying on this Agreement in continuing in such capacity.

(b) In the event Indemnitee is required to bring any action to enforce his or her rights or to collect moneys due under this Agreement, the Company shall advance Indemnitee all of Indemnitee’s reasonably fees and expenses in bringing and pursuing such action. Indemnitee shall be responsible for reimbursement to the Company of such advances in the event that Indemnitee is not successful in such action.

9. No Employment Rights. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to confer on Indemnitee any right to continue in the employ of the Company for any period of time or interfere with or otherwise restrict in any way the rights of the Company or of Indemnitee, which rights are hereby expressly reserved by each, to terminate his or her service at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, except as may be provided otherwise in an agreement between the Company and Indemnitee.

10. Severability. Each of the provisions of this Agreement are separate and distinct and independent of one another, so that if any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not effect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of this Agreement.

11. Blue Pencil. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the parties agree that the court making such determination shall have the power to amend such provision or to delete specific words or phrases so that such provision shall then be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

12. Subrogation. In the event of payment under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all rights of recovery of Indemnitee, who shall execute all papers required and shall do everything that may be necessary to secure such rights, including without limitation, the execution of such documents necessary to enable the Company to effectively bring suit to enforce such rights.

13. Governing Law and Forum Selection. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Nevada without resort to conflict of laws principles.

14. Binding Effect; Amendment. This Agreement shall be binding on the parties, their successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of Indemnitee, his or her heirs, personal representatives and assigns, and to the benefit of the Company, its successors and assigns. No amendment, modification, termination or cancellation of this Agreement shall be effective unless in a writing signed by both parties hereto.

15. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if (i) delivered by hand and receipted for by the party to whom said notice or other communication shall have been directed or (ii) mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business day after the date on which it is so mailed and addressed to the following addresses:

If to Indemnitee: _________________________

_________________________

If to the Company:_________________________

_________________________

Attention: President

With a copy to: ________________________

_________________________

A party may change their address by delivering notice of such changed addressed in the manner set forth in this Section 15.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Indemnity Agreement as of the date first above written.

“Indemnitee”		Reading International, Inc.
		a Nevada corporation



_________________________	By:	_________________________
	Its:	_________________________

exhibit31_1.htm

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James J. Cotter, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with general accepted accounting principles;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

By:	/s/ James J. Cotter
	James J. Cotter
	Chief Executive Officer
	November 7, 2008

exhibit31_2.htm

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrzej Matyczynski, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International Inc.;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5)	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

By:	/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
	Andrzej Matyczynski
	Chief Financial Officer
	November 7, 2008

exhibit32.htm

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Reading International, Inc. (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

·	The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·	The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: November 7, 2008

/s/ James J. Cotter

Name: James J. Cotter

Title: Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski

Name: Andrzej Matyczynski

Title: Chief Financial Officer