e10vq
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8625
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
NEVADA
|
|
95-3885184 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
500 Citadel Drive
|
|
90040 |
Suite 300, Commerce CA
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (213) 235-2240
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date. As of November 7, 2005, there were 20,990,458 shares of Class A
Nonvoting Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share and 1,495,490 shares of Class B Voting Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share outstanding.
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I Financial Information
Item 1 Financial Statements
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,202 |
|
|
$ |
12,292 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
Investment in marketable securities, at cost |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,931 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
19,378 |
|
|
|
34,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property & equipment, net |
|
|
190,130 |
|
|
|
131,672 |
|
Property held for development |
|
|
6,771 |
|
|
|
27,346 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
8,462 |
|
|
|
7,352 |
|
Capitalized leasing costs, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
13,644 |
|
|
|
13,816 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
9,986 |
|
|
|
11,957 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
251,049 |
|
|
$ |
230,226 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
12,570 |
|
|
$ |
12,335 |
|
Film rent payable |
|
|
3,218 |
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
Notes payable current portion |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,174 |
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
Deferred current revenue |
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,210 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
26,761 |
|
|
|
40,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable long-term portion |
|
|
90,552 |
|
|
|
67,664 |
|
Notes payable to related parties |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Deferred non-current revenue |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
11,079 |
|
|
|
10,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
142,922 |
|
|
|
124,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Nonvoting Common Stock, par value $0.01, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 35,461,983 issued and 20,983,708 outstanding at
September 30, 2005 and 34,444,167 issued and 20,452,733 outstanding
at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Class B Voting Common Stock, par value $0.01, 20,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,148,745 issued and 1,495,490 outstanding at September
30, 2005 and 2,198,761 shares issued and 1,545,506 outstanding at
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Nonvoting Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 12,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
128,001 |
|
|
|
124,307 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(51,375 |
) |
|
|
(54,902 |
) |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(3,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
31,321 |
|
|
|
32,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
104,657 |
|
|
|
102,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
251,049 |
|
|
$ |
230,226 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cinema |
|
$ |
21,429 |
|
|
$ |
20,919 |
|
|
$ |
64,328 |
|
|
$ |
54,934 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
10,858 |
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,809 |
|
|
|
24,164 |
|
|
|
75,186 |
|
|
|
64,196 |
|
|
Operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cinema |
|
|
17,140 |
|
|
|
16,327 |
|
|
|
52,375 |
|
|
|
43,842 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
|
|
9,409 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,466 |
|
|
|
24,871 |
|
|
|
80,411 |
|
|
|
68,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(5,225 |
) |
|
|
(3,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(3,465 |
) |
|
|
(2,559 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
Other (loss) income |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before minority interest expense, discontinued
operations, income tax expense, and equity earnings
of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(4,665 |
) |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
(8,517 |
) |
|
|
(3,985 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(4,805 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
(9,076 |
) |
|
|
(4,230 |
) |
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of business operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity
earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(4,805 |
) |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
(4,691 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
(Loss) income before equity earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(4,995 |
) |
|
|
(2,455 |
) |
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
(5,453 |
) |
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,572 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
|
(Loss) earnings per common share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
22,437,569 |
|
|
|
21,899,290 |
|
|
|
22,168,652 |
|
|
|
21,899,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
22,437,569 |
|
|
|
21,899,290 |
|
|
|
22,168,652 |
|
|
|
21,899,290 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain recognized on foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(1,642 |
) |
Equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
Distributions of earnings from joint ventures |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Gain on sale Puerto Rico operations |
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Glendale Building |
|
|
(12,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,409 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables |
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in assets held for sale |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
1,156 |
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other assets |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
(1,765 |
) |
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
Decrease in film rent payable |
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
(817 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenues and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,224 |
) |
|
|
3,173 |
|
Decrease in liabilities of assets held for sale |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
|
|
545 |
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Puerto Rico |
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Glendale Building |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(14,354 |
) |
|
|
(14,319 |
) |
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(23,244 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
Increase in property held for development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
Investment in joint venture |
|
|
(905 |
) |
|
|
(2,433 |
) |
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
(Purchase) sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
Repayment of loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(24,411 |
) |
|
|
(7,551 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term borrowings |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(9,641 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
25,707 |
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest distributions |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
24,936 |
|
|
|
(6,895 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
(13,816 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
12,292 |
|
|
|
21,735 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
10,202 |
|
|
$ |
7,919 |
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
4,411 |
|
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Non-cash transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for note receivable (Note 2) |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Buyer assumption of note payable on Glendale Building |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-cash financing of acquisitions (Note 18) |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,572 |
|
Property addition from purchase option asset |
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Treasury shares received |
|
$ |
(3,515 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Stock options exercised in exchange for treasury shares received |
|
$ |
3,515 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Reading International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Reading International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (RII and collectively with our
consolidated subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, the Company, Reading and we, us, or
our), was incorporated in 1999 as Citadel Holding Corporation, a Nevada corporation (CDL), is
the successor to Citadel Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1983 (CDL
Del) and was renamed Reading incident to the merger of CDL, Craig Corporation and Reading
Entertainment, Inc. in 2001. The current company and its predecessors have been in business in
the United States since 1831. Today, our businesses consist primarily of:
|
|
|
the development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States,
Australia and New Zealand; and |
|
|
|
|
the development, ownership and operation of retail and commercial real estate in
Australia, New Zealand and the United States, including entertainment-themed retail centers
(ETRC) in Australia and New Zealand and live theater assets in Manhattan and Chicago in
the United States. |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US
GAAP) for interim reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim reporting. As such, certain information
and footnote disclosures typically required by US GAAP for complete financial statements have been
condensed or omitted. Other than the disclosure of discontinued operations, there have been no
material changes in the information disclosed in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (2004
Annual Report). The financial information presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the September Report), including the information under the
heading, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
should be read in conjunction with our 2004 Annual Report which contains the latest audited
financial statements and related footnotes.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered
necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of our
operations and cash flows for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005 have been
made. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire year. Certain amounts in
previously issued financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation.
In our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we
changed the classification of equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures to present such
returns as an operating activity. We previously presented such amounts as an investing activity.
We reclassified distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures to be consistent with our 2005
presentation which resulted in a net decrease to investing cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2004 of approximately $943,000 and a corresponding net increase to operating cash
flows from the amounts previously reported.
5
New Accounting and Tax Pronouncements
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS 154). SFAS
154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of voluntary changes
in accounting principle. It also requires that the new accounting principle be applied to the
balances of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which
retrospective application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening
balance of retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in an income statement. The
statement will be effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 154 to have a material
effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an Amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29 (SFAS 153). The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured
based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, however,
included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the
exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary
exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change
significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges
in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS 153
will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 Revised, Share Based Payment. The
statement establishes the standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. The statement focuses primarily on
accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions. Public companies may apply the standard on a modified prospective method. Under
this method, a company records compensation expense for all awards it grants after the date it
adopts the standard. In addition, public companies are required to record compensation expense for
the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
During 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred the effective date of this statement
until the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. The financial statement impact of
adopting of this statement has not yet been estimated.
On October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act).
The Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned
abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from
controlled foreign corporations. We do not expect to have material current or accumulated earnings
in controlled foreign corporations at December 31 2005, and therefore expect no opportunity to make
distributions that qualify for the tax benefits under the Act. Accordingly, we do not expect the
Act to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 2 Stock-Based Compensation
We have a stock based compensation plan for certain employees and non-employee directors
which is fully described in the 2004 Annual Report. We account for the plan under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APBO) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Under APBO No. 25, no
stock-based employee compensation cost has been reflected in net income, as all options granted
under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on
the date of grant. APBO No. 25 does not apply to non-
6
employees and would require that we record compensation expense for non-employees. However, APBO No. 25 applies to
non-employee directors when stock options are granted in connection with the non-employee
directors board services.
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS Nos. 123 and 148)
established disclosure requirements using the fair value basis method of accounting for
stock-based compensation. As permitted by SFAS Nos. 123 and 148, we have elected to continue
using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed under APBO No. 25. The following table
illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share as if we had applied the fair value
provisions of SFAS Nos. 123 and 148 to measure stock-based compensation (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Net (loss) income, as reported |
|
$ |
(4,572 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included
in reported net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Total stock-based
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value
based method for all awards |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,592 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,209 |
) |
|
$ |
3,464 |
|
|
$ |
(4,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and dilutedas reported |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
Basic and dilutedpro forma |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
During the first quarter of 2005, we issued 20,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock
with an exercise price of $2.76 per share pursuant to the exercise by a former director of fully
vested and then currently exercisable stock options. The exercise price was paid in the form of a
promissory note in the amount of $55,000.
During the second quarter of 2005, we issued 5,850 shares and 5,000 shares of Class A
Non-Voting Common Stock at exercise prices of $4.97 and $2.76 per share, respectively, to an
employee of the corporation under our stock based compensation plan.
During the third quarter of 2005, we issued 925,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock
at an exercise price of $3.80 per share to Mr. James J. Cotter, our Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, in connection with options previously granted by our Board of Directors and
issued to him as non-qualified stock options granted outside the Companys 1999 Stock Option Plan.
Pursuant to the terms of the stock option award, Mr. Cotter paid the exercise price by surrendering
486,842 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock to us as treasury stock, resulting in a net
increase in the number of shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock outstanding of 438,158 shares.
Additionally, we issued 12,000 shares Class A Non-Voting Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.01
per share to an employee of the corporation under our stock based compensation plan.
7
Note 3 Business Segments
Our operations are organized into two reportable business segments within the meaning of SFAS
No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Our reportable
segments are: (1) cinema exhibition and (2) real estate. The cinema segment is engaged in the
development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas. The real estate segment is engaged in
the development, ownership and operation of commercial properties, including ETRCs in Australia
and New Zealand and live theaters in the United States. Historically, our development projects
have included a cinema component. Incident to our real estate operations we have acquired, and
continue to hold, raw land in urban and suburban centers in Australia and New Zealand. As at
September 30, 2005, we owned an aggregate of approximately 59 acres of undeveloped land in suburban
areas of Melbourne and Sydney in Australia and in the central business district of Wellington, New
Zealand.
Corporate results include interest income earned with respect to cash balances, interest
expense, general and administrative expense (not directly attributable to another segment),
minority interest income (expense) and other income (expense). All operating results from
discontinued operations are included in (Loss) income from discontinued operations. (Loss)
income from discontinued operations from the Puerto Rico operations and the Glendale building is
presented separately from gain on disposal of business operations.
Information about our cinema and real estate segments operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is presented in the following tables (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
21,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,380 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,809 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
17,140 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,624 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(4,133 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(5,858 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
(6,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
20,919 |
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,164 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
16,327 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,923 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(3,411 |
) |
|
|
(707 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
Income (loss) before (loss) income from
discontinued operations and income tax
expense |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(4,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
(4,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
64,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,858 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,186 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
52,375 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,523 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
9,409 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8,727 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
(8,971 |
) |
|
|
(5,225 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
and income tax expense |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
(11,809 |
) |
|
|
(8,063 |
) |
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of business operations |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
12,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
15,313 |
|
|
$ |
(12,452 |
) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
54,934 |
|
|
$ |
9,262 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,196 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
43,842 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,771 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
7,667 |
|
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
|
|
(3,840 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
Income (loss) before (loss) income from
discontinued operations and income tax
expense |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(6,816 |
) |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,616 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
(7,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
|
Note 4 Operation in Foreign Currency
As fully described in our 2004 Annual Report, we have cinema and real estate operations with
significant assets in Australia and New Zealand. To the extent possible, we conduct our Australian
and New Zealand operations on a self-funding basis. The carrying value of our Australian and New
Zealand assets fluctuate due to changes in the exchange rates between the US dollar and the
functional currency of Australia (Australian dollar) and New Zealand (New Zealand dollar). We have
no derivative financial instruments to hedge foreign currency exposure.
Presented in the table below are the currency exchange rates for Australia and New Zealand as
of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Dollar |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Australian Dollar |
|
$ |
0.7643 |
|
|
$ |
0.7709 |
|
New Zealand Dollar |
|
$ |
0.6938 |
|
|
$ |
0.7125 |
|
|
9
Note 5 (Loss) Earnings Per Share
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) earnings to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) earnings to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period after
giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that would have been outstanding if the
dilutive common shares had been issued. Stock options give rise to potentially dilutive common
shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Class A
Nonvoting |
|
|
539,850 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
|
|
481,350 |
|
|
|
1,448,200 |
|
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
|
|
1,181,700 |
|
Class B Voting |
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
185,100 |
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, we recorded net
operating losses. As such, the incremental shares of 215,056 and 648,414 in 2005 and 717,073 and
659,786 in 2004, respectively, from stock options to purchase shares of common stock were excluded
from the computation of diluted loss per share because they were anti-dilutive in those periods.
Note 6 Rental Property and Property and Equipment
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had investments in rental property and
property and equipment as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
50,978 |
|
|
$ |
29,579 |
|
Building |
|
|
70,416 |
|
|
|
69,288 |
|
Leasehold interest |
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
7,931 |
|
Construction-in-progress and property under development |
|
|
48,652 |
|
|
|
6,485 |
|
Fixtures and equipment |
|
|
50,777 |
|
|
|
48,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
228,831 |
|
|
|
162,231 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(38,701 |
) |
|
|
(30,559 |
) |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
190,130 |
|
|
$ |
131,672 |
|
|
As part of construction-in-progress, we recorded $1.8 million in capitalized interest for the
nine months period ended September 30, 2005. There was no capitalized interest during the period
ended December 31, 2004.
10
Note 7 Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of
accounting, and as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 include the following (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Mt. Gravatt Cinema Joint Venture |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
$ |
3,901 |
|
|
$ |
3,845 |
|
Berkeley Cinemas Joint Ventures |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,462 |
|
|
$ |
7,352 |
|
|
Cinema Joint Ventures. For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2005, we recorded
equity earnings from Mt. Gravatt of $92,000 and $311,000, respectively, and from Berkeley Cinemas
of $330,000 and $702,000, respectively.
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC. During the first quarter of 2005, we
increased our investment by $905,000 in the 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC, a
limited liability company formed to redevelop our former cinema site at 205 East 57th
Street in Manhattan, now known as Place 57. This increase maintained our 25% equity ownership in
the joint venture in light of increased budgeted construction costs.
Note 8 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of January 1, 2002, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
we do not amortize goodwill. Instead we perform an annual impairment review of our goodwill and
other intangible assets in the fourth quarter unless changes in circumstances indicate that an
asset may be impaired. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had goodwill consisting
of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cinema |
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
$ |
9,429 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
4,387 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,644 |
|
|
$ |
13,816 |
|
|
We have intangible assets other than goodwill which are subject to amortization and are being
amortized over various periods. We amortize our beneficial lease over 20 years and our option fee
and acquisition costs over 10 years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
amortization expense totaled $297,000 and $909,000, respectively.
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005 |
|
Lease |
|
|
Option Fee |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
11,370 |
|
|
$ |
2,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
$ |
15,301 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
Total, net |
|
$ |
8,746 |
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
$ |
775 |
|
|
$ |
9,986 |
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 |
|
Lease |
|
|
Option Fee |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
10,459 |
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
16,362 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
Total, net |
|
$ |
8,418 |
|
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
11,957 |
|
|
We amortize our beneficial leases over the lease terms of twenty years and our option fees and
acquisition costs over 10 years. To recognize the exercise of a portion of the City Cinemas Master
Lease Agreement in September 2005, we recorded $1.3 million of our option fees to the Cinemas 1, 2,
3 tenants ground lease interest that we purchased on September 19, 2005 (see Note 18 -
Acquisitions) thus reducing our option fee balance to $0.5 million.
Note 9 Prepaid and Other Assets
Prepaid and other assets are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Other |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
Total prepaid and other current assets |
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cinema and non-rental real estate assets |
|
$ |
1,468 |
|
|
$ |
2,073 |
|
Long-term restricted cash |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Deferred expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
$ |
2,662 |
|
|
$ |
3,933 |
|
|
Note 10 Income Tax
The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was
composed of the following amounts (dollars in thousands), respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Foreign income tax provision |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Foreign withholding tax |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Federal tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income tax |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Net tax provision |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
12
As of September 30 2005, approximately $11.8 million in taxable temporary differences exist
from the sale of the Glendale office building and its replacement with the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 fee
interest. Any future taxable income which may be related to the transaction may be offset by
approximately $22.8 million in future deductible temporary differences arising from available U.S.
operating loss carry forwards. Accordingly, no deferred tax provision has been recorded.
Note 11 Notes Payable
During the first nine months of 2005, we drew down $25.6 million (AUS$33.4 million) on our
Australian credit facilities consisting of $7.8 million (AUS$10.2 million) from our Australian
Corporate Credit Facility, used in part to purchase an office building in Melbourne for $1.9
million (AUS$2.5 million) to be used as the headquarters for our Australian and New Zealand
operations (which had previously been located in leased quarters) and to fit-out our new 8 screen
cinema in Adelaide, Australia for $1.1 million (AUS$1.5 million) and $17.8 million (AUS$23.2
million) from our Newmarket Construction Loan, used to finance the construction of our Newmarket
Shopping Centre development in Brisbane, Australia. These borrowings were partially offset by the
assumption by the buyer of the Glendale Building of the $10.1 million mortgage loan on the
property. Additionally, on September 19, 2005, we issued a $9.0 million promissory note bearing a
fixed interest rate of 8.25% and maturing on December 31, 2010 to Sutton Hill Capital (SHC) in
exchange for the underlying tenants ground lease interest of Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 (see Note 18 -
Acquisitions). The estimated fair value of our notes payable at September 30, 2005 and December
31, 2004 were approximately $104.7 million and $73.0 million, respectively.
During the period we were able to increase our Australian Corporate Credit Facility from $42.0
million (AUS$55.0 million) to $51.5 million (AUS$67.4 million), of which $2.9 million (AUS$3.8
million) has been allocated to landlord guarantees, including a ($7.6 million AUS$10.0 million)
working capital facility. This additional liquidity will allow us to continue to expand our
operations in Australia.
Note 12 Other Liabilities
Other liabilities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred payables |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
Other |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
599 |
|
|
Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign withholding taxes |
|
$ |
4,888 |
|
|
$ |
5,334 |
|
Straight-line rent liability |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,079 |
|
|
$ |
10,615 |
|
|
13
Note 13 Commitments and Contingencies
The following is an update of our commitments and contingencies set forth in our 2004 Annual
Report:
Whitehorse Litigation
On October 30, 2000, we commenced litigation in the Supreme Court of Victoria at Melbourne,
Commercial and Equity Division, against our joint venture partner and the controlling stockholders
of our joint venture partner in the Whitehorse Shopping Center. That action is entitled Reading
Entertainment Australia PTY, LTD vs. Burstone Victoria PTY, LTD and May Way Khor and David
Frederick Burr, and was brought to collect on a promissory note (the K/B Promissory Note)
evidencing a loan that we made to Ms. Khor and Mr. Burr and that was guaranteed by Burstone
Victoria PTY, LTD (Burstone and collectively with
Ms. Khor and Mr. Burr, the Burstone Parties).
This loan balance has been previously written off and is no longer
recorded on our books. The Burstone Parties asserted in defense certain set-offs and counterclaims, alleging, in essence,
that we had breached our alleged obligations to proceed with the development of the Whitehorse
Shopping Center, causing the Burstone Parties substantial damages. Following trial, the trial
court not only affirmed the liability of the Burstone Parties on the K/B Promissory Note but also
determined that we had breached certain obligations owed to WPG (the joint venture in which we own
a 50% interest and in which Burstone owns the remaining 50% interest). The trial court did not,
however, find us in breach of any direct obligations to any one or more of the Burstone Parties.
The trial court has entered judgment against us and in favor of WPG in the amount of $3.4
million (AUS$4.5 million). The trial court has also entered judgment against the Burstone Parties
and in our favor in the amount of $3.2 million (AUS$4.2 million). Further, the trial court has
found us responsible to reimburse the Burstone Parties for 65% of their out-of-pocket legal fees,
an amount not yet determined but estimated at approximately $764,000 (AUS$1.0 million) . In
addition, we have settled various ancillary claims against us for an additional $306,000
(AUS$400,000), which has now been paid to WPG.
As discussed in greater detail below, we have given timely notice of our intention to appeal
the judgment entered against us by the trial court and intend to vigorously prosecute that appeal.
The Burstone Parties have likewise appealed, arguing that the damages assessed in favor of WPG and
against us should be higher.
A provisional liquidator has been appointed for WPG, and that company is now in the process of
being wound up. As a consequence of our 50% interest in WPG, in the event that we are not
successful in our appeal, we currently anticipate that we will ultimately receive liquidating
distributions from WPG in an amount equal to approximately $1.8 million (AUS$2.3 million). During
the third quarter, the Burstone Parties paid us $229,000 (AUS$300,000) against our judgment against
them, and we have now entered into an agreement with the Burstone Parties, pursuant to which they
have agreed to pay the balance of our judgment against them, together with ongoing interest, over
time and have provided various undertakings and a guaranty to secure that obligation.
We are advised by senior Queens Counsel after conducting an independent review of the
evidence submitted at trial and the trial courts opinion that, in his opinion, the trial court
erred in a number of critical aspects, and that we should have no liability to WPG or any of the
Burstone Parties. Accordingly, we have appealed that part of the trial courts determination and
have recorded no liability for potential loss as of September 30, 2005.
14
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Ground Lease
As part of the purchase of the Cinemas 1, 2, 3 tenants ground lease interest, we have agreed
in principal, as a part of our negotiations to acquire the land and the SHC interests in the
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3, to grant an option to Messrs. Cotter and Forman to acquire, at cost, up to a 25%
non-managing membership interest in the limited liability company that we formed to acquire these
interests. That option has not yet been documented, as the final terms of that option have not yet
been agreed.
Rialto Joint Venture
As of September 30, 2005, we were under contract to acquire 100% of the stock of Rialto
Entertainment for $4.5 million (NZ$6.5 million). Rialto Entertainment is a 50% joint venture
partner with Village Roadshow/SkyCity Cinemas in the largest art cinema circuit in New Zealand.
The joint venture owns five cinemas with 22 screens in the New Zealand cities of Auckland,
Christchurch, Wellington, Dunedin and Hamilton.
Also, as of September 30, 2005, we were under contract to acquire for $694,000 (NZ$1.0
million) a 1/3 interest in Rialto Distribution. Rialto Distribution, an unincorporated joint
venture, is engaged in the business of distributing art film in New Zealand and Australia. (see
Note 20 Subsequent Events).
Note 14 Minority Interest
Minority interest is composed of the following enterprises:
|
|
|
50% of membership interest in Angelika Film Center LLC (AFC LLC) by a subsidiary of
National Auto Credit, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
33% minority interest in the Elsternwick Joint Venture by Champion Pictures Pty Ltd.;
and |
|
|
|
|
25% minority interest in Australian Country Cinemas by Panorama Cinemas for the
21st Century Pty Ltd. |
The components of minority interest are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
AFC LLC |
|
$ |
3,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,997 |
|
Australian Country Cinemas |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Elsternwick Unincorporated Joint Venture |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Others |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated affiliates |
|
$ |
3,470 |
|
|
$ |
3,470 |
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) expense for the |
|
|
(Income) expense for the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
AFC LLC |
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
Australian Country Cinemas |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Elsternwick Unincorporated
Joint Venture |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Minority interest expense |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
Note 15 Common Stock
During the third quarter of 2005, we issued 925,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock
at an exercise price of $3.80 per share to Mr. James J. Cotter, our Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, in connection with options issued to him under our stock based compensation
plan. Pursuant to the terms of the stock option award, Mr. Cotter paid the exercise price by
surrendering 486,842 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock to us as treasury stock, resulting
in a net increase in the number of shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock outstanding of 438,158
shares.
Also during the third quarter, we issued 12,000 shares Class A Non-Voting Common Stock at an
exercise price of $4.01 per share for cash to an employee of the corporation under our stock based
compensation plan.
During the second quarter of 2005, we issued 5,850 shares and 5,000 shares of Class A
Non-Voting Common Stock at exercise prices of $4.97 and $2.76 per share, respectively, for cash to
an employee of the corporation under our stock based compensation plan.
During the first quarter of 2005, we issued 20,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock
with an exercise price of $2.76 per share pursuant to the exercise by a former director of fully
vested and then currently exercisable stock options. The exercise price was paid in the form of a
promissory note in the amount of $55,000.
As noted in our 2004 Annual Report, the sellers of the Movieland Circuit were given
non-transferable options to put to us the Class A Common Stock issued to them in connection with
the acquisition of that circuit, at a put price of NZ$11.94 at any time through 2006. For the
period ended September 30, 2005, the put option liability is on our books for $184,000. We
remeasure this liability each period through the end of the option life in January 2006.
Note 16 Comprehensive Income
U.S. GAAP requires that the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized
gains and/or losses on securities that are available-for-sale (AFS) be classified as
comprehensive income. The following table sets forth our comprehensive income for the periods
indicated (dollars in thousands):
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,572 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
(5,011 |
) |
Unrealized loss on AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4,112 |
) |
|
$ |
597 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
(9,140 |
) |
|
Note 17 Discontinued Operations and Assets Held For Sale
In accordance with SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
we report as discontinued operations real estate assets that meet the definition of a component
of an entity and have been sold or meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale under SFAS
144. We included all results of these discontinued operations, less applicable income taxes, in
a separate component of operations on the consolidated statements of operations under the heading
discontinued operations. This treatment resulted in reclassifications of the 2004 financial
statement amounts to conform to the 2005 presentation.
Wilmington and Northern Property. On September 26, 2005, we sold a piece of property known as
our Wilmington and Northern property for cash totaling $515,000. This property was one of several
remaining tracks of railroad land, all of which are considered non-core assets under our current
business plan. The sale resulted in a negligible loss during the third quarter and the property
produced a nominal income per year.
Glendale Building. On May 17, 2005, we sold our Glendale office building in Glendale,
California for $10.3 million cash and $10.1 million of assumed debt resulting in a $12.0 million
gain. All the cash proceeds from the sale were used in the purchase for $12.2 million of the
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 fee interest and of the landlords interest in the ground lease, encumbering that
land, as part of a tax deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The assets and liabilities of the Glendale building were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
$ |
717 |
|
Rental property, net of depreciation |
|
|
7,396 |
|
Capitalized leasing costs |
|
|
277 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
200 |
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
8,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
A/P and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
Property taxes payable |
|
|
67 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
211 |
|
Mortgage payable |
|
|
10,188 |
|
|
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
12,533 |
|
|
17
The 2005 and 2004 quarterly results for the Glendale Property are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
$ |
1,103 |
|
|
$ |
2059 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
Income from discontinued
operations before gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
12,400 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
Puerto Rico Cinema Operations. On June 8, 2005, we sold our assets and certain liabilities
associated with our Puerto Rico cinema operations for $2.3 million resulting in a $1.6 million
gain. Net losses of $1.8 million and $714,000 were included in the loss from discontinued
operations for the nine months ending 2005 and 2004, respectively, relating to these operations. No
material income tax provision arises from this transaction.
The assets and liabilities of the Puerto Rico operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivable |
|
$ |
84 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
84 |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
185 |
|
Rental property, net of depreciation |
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
Total assets held for sale |
|
$ |
2,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
A/P and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
Property Taxes payable |
|
|
377 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
50 |
|
Other liabilities-non current |
|
|
678 |
|
|
Total liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
2,677 |
|
|
The 2005 and 2004 quarterly results for the Puerto Rico discontinued operations are as
follows:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,249 |
|
|
$ |
4,575 |
|
|
$ |
10,248 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
10,070 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
before gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
(714 |
) |
Gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(600 |
) |
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
$ |
(714 |
) |
|
Note 18 Acquisitions
Melbourne Office Building.
On September 29, 2005, we purchased an office building in Melbourne, Australia for $1.9
million (AUS$2.5 million) to serve as our Australia headquarters. We fully financed this property
by drawing on our Australian Corporate Credit Facility.
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Ground Lease.
On September 19, 2005, we acquired the tenants interest in the ground lease estate that is
currently between (i) our fee ownership of the underlying land and (ii) our current possessory
interest as the tenant in the building and improvements constituting the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 in
Manhattan. This tenants ground lease interest was purchased from Sutton Hill Capital LLC (SHC)
for a $9.0 million promissory note, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 8.25% and maturing on
December 31, 2010. As SHC is a related party to our corporation, our Boards Audit and Conflicts
Committee, comprised entirely of outside independent directors, and subsequently our entire Board
of Directors unanimously approved the purchase of the property. The Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 is located on
3rd Avenue between 59th and 60th Streets.
The acquisition of the tenants ground lease interest finalizes the acquisition side of a tax
deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code designed to exchange our interest
in our only non-entertainment oriented fee property in the United States for the fee interest
underlying our leasehold estate in the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3. The acquisition of this tenants ground
lease interest and the Cinemas 1, 2, 3 Fee Interest described below have resulted in a book value
of approximately $22.9 million (which includes $1.3 million of option fees paid in 2000 as part of
the City Cinemas Master Lease Agreement, see Note 8 Goodwill and Intangible Assets) and a tax
basis of $9.1 million.
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Fee Interest.
On June 1, 2005, we acquired for $12.6 million the fee interest and the landlords ground
lease interest underlying our Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property in Manhattan, as a part of a tax deferred
exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The funds used for the acquisition came
primarily from the sale proceeds of our Glendale, California office building.
19
As a result of the acquisition of this fee interest, the landlords interest in the ground
lease and the tenants interest in the ground lease, our effective rental expense with respect to
the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 and the Village East cinema has decreased by approximately $1.0 million
annually beginning September 30, 2005.
Note 19 Derivative Instruments
The following table sets forth the terms of our interest rate swap derivative instruments at
September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive Variable |
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Pay Fixed Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Maturity Date |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
16,943,000 |
|
|
|
6.1800 |
% |
|
|
5.6517 |
% |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
12,477,000 |
|
|
|
6.6800 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
11,465,000 |
|
|
|
6.4400 |
% |
|
|
5.7167 |
% |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
9,554,000 |
|
|
|
5.7000 |
% |
|
|
5.7167 |
% |
|
December 31, 2007 |
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
we marked our Australian interest swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet
resulting in an $204,000 (AUS$271,000) decrease and $194,000 (AUS$244,000) decrease to interest
expense during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. We have
recorded the fair market value of our interest rate swaps of $616,000 (AUS$806,000) as an other
long-term liability. The swap with a notional amount of $12,477,000 does not have a Receive
Variable Rate because the instrument will not be effective until March 31, 2006. In accordance
with SFAS No. 133, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as
financial reporting hedges.
Note 20 Subsequent Events
Effective October 1, 2005, we purchased 100% of the stock of Rialto Entertainment for $4.5
million (NZ$6.5 million). Rialto Entertainment is a 50% joint venture partner with Village
Roadshow/SkyCity Cinemas in the largest art cinema circuit in New Zealand. The joint venture owns
five cinemas with 22 screens in the New Zealand cities of Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington,
Dunedin and Hamilton.
Also, as of October 1, 2005, we purchased for $694,000 (NZ$1.0 million) a 1/3 interest in
Rialto Distribution. Rialto Distribution, an unincorporated joint venture, is engaged in the
business of distributing art film in New Zealand and Australia.
20
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
As Reading International, Inc. (Reading and we, us or our), we consider ourselves to
be essentially a cinema exhibition and live theater operating company with a strong focus on the
development, operation and holding of commercial real estate assets. We believe that this
strategic mix coupled with our management expertise allows us to bring value to developable land by
providing our own anchor tenant and to realize the value in older cinema sites by developing
them, on an opportunistic basis, to their highest and best use. This strategy allows us to use
our available free cash flow to build assets, while freeing us, to some extent, from the volatility
that can result from a focus on operating cinema assets in leased facilities.
Our fundamental business objective is to build value for our shareholders over time through
the acquisition, development, and operation of tangible assets. Accordingly, we will from time
to time trade off short term cash flow for longer term opportunities. For example:
|
|
|
This year we made the strategic decision to sell our Glendale, California Office
Building, a mature property producing cash flow of approximately $1.4 million per year (but
79% leased to a single tenant under a lease due to expire in 2007), to trade into various
real property interests allowing us ultimately to assemble a 7,840 square foot site on
3rd Avenue between 59th and 60th Streets in Manhattan,
commonly known as the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3. That property is currently zoned for development
of up to 78,400 square feet of commercial and/or residential development. |
|
|
|
|
Last year we sold our Sutton Cinema, to permit the development of Place 57, a 67 unit
residential condominium development on 57th Street in Manhattan just below
3rd Avenue. As we have no experience in residential condominium development,
we have, in essence, teamed up with an affiliate of the Prudential Life Insurance Company
to develop the project, in which we retain a 25% interest. We are advised by the
developer that units representing approximately 90% of the square footage of the structure
are now in escrow, at an aggregate sale price of approximately $123.7 million. The
building has been topped out, and we anticipate a closing in the second quarter of next
year. We have also retained the right to take, as a partial distribution of our interest,
the approximately 3,800 square foot ground floor retail condominium unit in the project. |
|
|
|
|
We own approximately 57 acres of raw developable land in suburban and urban areas of
Melbourne and Sydney in Australia and approximately one acre in the central business
district of Wellington, New Zealand. Generally, none of this land is currently producing
meaningful income. We believe that our patience with respect to these properties has, and
will continue, to pay off, particularly given the recent designation of our 50 acre Burwood
site in Melbourne as a Major Activity Centre. In November 2005, we will be opening a
94,000 square foot shopping center on our Newmarket property in a suburb of Brisbane. |
Our cash flow has in recent periods been adversely affected by various litigation costs. These costs related primarily to our
antitrust litigation aimed at improving our access to film at our Village East Cinema in Manhattan
and to litigation growing out of one of our initial joint venture development projects in
Australia. Discovery is complete with respect to the antitrust litigation, and a hearing on the
defendants summary judgment motions is scheduled for January of next year. The joint venture
litigation is on appeal. We believe that the significant cost of these two matters is
substantially behind us.
Our business operations currently include:
|
|
|
the development, ownership and operation of multiplex cinemas in the United States,
Australia, and New Zealand; |
21
|
|
|
the development and operation of cinema-based entertainment-themed retail centers
(ETRC) in Australia and New Zealand; |
|
|
|
|
the ownership and operation, typically as a landlord, of Off Broadway style live
theaters in Manhattan and Chicago; and |
|
|
|
|
the development, ownership and operation of commercial real estate in Australia, New
Zealand and the United States typically as a business ancillary to the development and
operation of cinemas, cinema-based ETRCs and live theaters. |
We manage our worldwide cinema business under various different brands:
|
|
|
in the US, under the Reading, Angelika Film Center and City Cinemas brands; |
|
|
|
|
in Australia, under the Reading brand; and |
|
|
|
|
in New Zealand, under the Reading, Berkeley Cinemas and
Rialto brands. |
We currently operate 33 cinemas with 220 screens, have interests in certain unconsolidated
joint ventures which own an additional eleven cinemas with 67 screens and manage three cinemas with
14 screens. On June 8, 2005, we completed the sale of our six cinemas with 48 screens in Puerto
Rico for $2.3 million. The assets were previously operated by us under the Cine Vista brand. The
sale of the CineVista circuit was the realization of a multi-year business goal, and reflects the
poor competitive situation in that market, where one exhibiter controls in excess of 80% of the
market, and has adopted a business plan of maintaining ticket prices at what we believe to be
uncommercially low prices.
Our business plan going forward is to continue to identify, develop and acquire cinema and
live theater properties, focusing on those opportunities where we can acquire either the fee
interest underlying the operating assets, or long term leases, which we believe provide flexibility
with respect to the usage of such leasehold assets and to focus on the development of our existing
real estate. In the near term, we are focusing principally on the operation of our existing cinema
assets and in the development of five parcels of undeveloped real estate in Melbourne, Brisbane,
and Sydney in Australia and Wellington in New Zealand while taking advantage of those opportunities
that may present themselves from time to time to strategically expand our existing cinema circuits.
Consistent with that intention to be opportunistic in our acquisition of additional cinemas, during
the second quarter we entered into a contract to acquire a 50% unconsolidated joint venture
interest in 5 cinemas with 22 screens. That acquisition closed effective October 1, 2005 and those
screens are included in the screen count set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph. Also,
as of October 20, 2005, we have now opened a new 8 screen cinema in Adelaide, Australia.
During the third quarter, our efforts on the real estate side of our business were focused in
large part on:
|
|
|
the advancement of the entitlements process for our 51 acre Burwood site in suburban
Melbourne, Australia as a Major Activity Center under Melbourne 2030, the Victoria
governments strategic plan for the development of Melbourne. On July 18, 2005, the City
Council voted unanimously to allow development on the site of a mixed-use retail,
entertainment, commercial and residential development. That approval is now before the
state government; |
|
|
|
|
the construction and finalization of the lease-up of our 4.1 acre Newmarket Shopping
Center in Brisbane, Australia (due to open in November 2005 with 94,000 square feet of
leased retail space); and |
|
|
|
|
completion of the assemblage of our Cinemas 1, 2, 3 site on 3rd Avenue in
Manhattan, by acquiring the tenants ground lease interest that is currently between (i)
our fee ownership of the underlying land and (ii) our current possessory interest as the
tenant in the building and improvements constituting the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3. |
22
A significant portion of our business is conducted in Australia and New Zealand, and as such,
we are subject to a certain degree of currency risk. We do not engage in currency hedging
activities. Rather, to the extent possible, we operate our Australian and New Zealand operations on
a self-funding basis. Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses,
whenever possible, in local currencies. As a result, a majority of our expenses in Australia and
New Zealand have been procured in local currencies. Due to the developing nature of our operations
in Australia and New Zealand, our revenues are not yet significantly greater than our operating
expenses. The resulting natural operating hedge has led to a negligible foreign currency effect on
our earnings. As we continue to progress with our acquisition and development activities in
Australia and New Zealand, we cannot assure you that the foreign currency effect on our earnings
will be insignificant in the future.
We continue to acquire, to dispose of or to reposition assets in accordance with our business
plan as follows:
|
|
|
Elizabeth Cinema. On October 20, 2005, we opened a new 8 screen cinema in Adelaide,
Australia. |
|
|
|
|
Rialto Joint Venture Purchase. Effective October 1, 2005, we purchased 100% of the
stock of Rialto Entertainment for $4.5 million (NZ$6.5 million). Rialto Entertainment is a
50% joint venture partner with Village Roadshow/SkyCity Cinemas in the largest art cinema
circuit in New Zealand. The joint venture owns five cinemas with 22 screens in the New
Zealand cities of Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington, Dunedin and Hamilton. Also, as of
October 1, 2005, we purchased for $694,000 (NZ$1.0 million) a 1/3 interest in Rialto
Distribution. Rialto Distribution, an unincorporated joint venture, is engaged in the
business of distributing art film in New Zealand and Australia. |
|
|
|
|
Melbourne Office Building. On September 29, 2005, we purchased an office building in
Melbourne, Australia for $1.9 million (AUS$2.5 million) to serve as our Australia
headquarters. We fully financed this property by drawing on our Australian Corporate
Credit Facility. Previously, we operated in leased space. |
|
|
|
|
Wilmington and Northern Property. On September 26, 2005, we sold our Wilmington and
Northern property for $515,000. This property was one of several remaining tracks of
railroad land, all of which are considered non-core assets under our current business plan. |
|
|
|
|
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Ground Lease. On September 19, 2005, we acquired the tenants ground
lease interest that is currently between (i) our fee ownership of the underlying
land and (ii) our current possessory interest as the tenant in the building and
improvements constituting the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 in Manhattan. This tenants ground lease
interest was purchased from Sutton Hill Capital LLC (SHC) for a $9.0 million note
payable. As SHC is a related party to our corporation, our Boards Audit and Conflicts
Committee, comprised entirely of outside independent directors, and subsequently our entire
Board of Directors unanimously approved the purchase of the property. The Cinemas 1, 2 & 3
is located on 3rd Avenue between 59th and 60th Streets. |
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Cinema Operations. As of June 8, 2005, we closed the sale of all of our
cinema assets located in Puerto Rico for $2.3 million, resulting in a book gain of $1.6
million. |
|
|
|
|
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Fee Interest. On June 1, 2005, we purchased the approximately 7,840
square-foot fee interest and the landlords interest in the ground lease underlying our
current sub-leasehold interest in the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property located in Manhattan on
3rd Avenue between 59th Street and 60th Street for $12.6
million. Funding for this purchase came primarily from the net funds received from the
sale of the Glendale office building. |
|
|
|
|
Glendale Building. On May 17, 2005, we closed the sale of our Glendale California office
building for $21.0 resulting in a book gain of $12.0 million. At the closing, we received
net cash of approximately $10.3 million and the buyer assumed our liability under the $10.1
million mortgage encumbering the property. This was our only domestic commercial property (other than our leasehold interest
in our Los Angeles County headquarters and certain landholdings) that had no entertainment
components. |
23
|
|
|
205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC. During the first quarter of 2005,
we increased our investment by $905,000 to $3.2 million in the 205-209 East 57th
Street Associates, LLC (57th Street Associates). The increase in investment
maintained our 25% equity ownership in the joint venture, in light of certain higher than
initially budgeted construction costs. Construction is currently anticipated to be
complete by mid-2006, and condominium units in the project are currently being offered for
sale. The managing member of 57th Street Associates reports that it now has
under contract 61 out of 67 units, at an average selling price of $1,321 per square foot an
increase of $221 per square foot or 20.1% from the projects budget. We currently
anticipate that construction will be completed and the sale of individual condominium units
closed, during the second quarter of 2006. |
Results of Operations
During the third quarter of 2005, we directly operated 32 cinemas with 212 screens, have
interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have varying interests, which own an
additional six cinemas with 45 screens and managed three cinemas with 14 screens. Regarding real
estate, we own and operated during the quarter three ETRCs that we developed in Australia and New
Zealand; own the fee interests in four developed commercial properties in Manhattan and Chicago,
all of which are improved with live theaters comprising seven stages and, in two cases, ancillary
retail and commercial space; own the fee interests underlying one of our Manhattan cinemas and hold
for development an additional five parcels (aggregating approximately
58 acres) in urbanized areas
of Australia and New Zealand. Two of these parcels (comprising
approximately 54 acres) are in
areas designated by the provincial government of Victoria, Australia as major activity centers,
and we are currently in the land use planning phases of their development. In an effort to reduce
general and administrative rental costs in Australia, during the third quarter of 2005, we
purchased our Melbourne Office Building which we intend to use for our Australia headquarters.
The tables below summarize the results of operations for each of our principal business
segments for the three (2005 Quarter) and nine (2005 Nine Months) months ended September 30,
2005 and the three (2004 Quarter) and nine (2004 Nine Months) months ended September 30, 2004,
respectively. Operating expenses include costs associated with the day-to-day operations of the
cinemas and live theaters and the management of rental properties. All operating results from
discontinued operations are included in (Loss) income from discontinued operations. (Loss)
income from discontinued operations from the Puerto Rico operations and the Glendale building is
presented separately from gain on disposal of business operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
21,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,380 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,809 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
17,140 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,624 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(4,133 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(5,858 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
(6,048 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,572 |
) |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
20,919 |
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,164 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
16,327 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,923 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(3,411 |
) |
|
|
(707 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
Income (loss) before (loss) income from
discontinued operations and income tax
expense |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(4,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
(4,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
64,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,858 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,186 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
52,375 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,523 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
9,409 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8,727 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
(8,971 |
) |
|
|
(5,225 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations
and income tax expense |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
(11,809 |
) |
|
|
(8,063 |
) |
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on
disposal of business operations |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
12,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,610 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
15,313 |
|
|
$ |
(12,452 |
) |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
|
Cinema |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
54,934 |
|
|
$ |
9,262 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,196 |
|
Operating expense |
|
|
43,842 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,771 |
|
Depreciation & amortization expense |
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
General & administrative expense |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
7,667 |
|
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
|
|
(3,840 |
) |
Minority interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
Income (loss) before (loss) income from
discontinued operations and income tax expense |
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(6,816 |
) |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,616 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
(7,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,098 |
) |
|
Cinema
Included in the cinema segment above is revenue and expense from the operations of 32 cinema
complexes with a total of 212 screens.
25
|
|
|
Cinema revenue increased for the 2005 Quarter by $510,000 or 2% and by $9.4 million or
17% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004. Approximately $8.3
million of the 2005
Nine Months increase was from the new operations in Australia and New Zealand. The
remaining increase of $1.1 million was the result of an increase in our domestic theatre
revenue. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expense increased for the 2005 Quarter by $813,000 or 5% and by $8.5 million
or 19% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004. Approximately
$7.9 million of the 2005 Nine Months increase was from the newly acquired Anderson Cinemas
in Australia and the Movieland Cinemas in New Zealand. The remaining increase of $600,000
was the result of increased theater film rental costs directly related to an increase in
our domestic theatre revenue. Overall our operating expenses for nine months year-to-year
were reasonably consistent at 81% of gross revenue for 2005 and 80% of gross revenue for
2004. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense increased for the 2005 Quarter by $418,000 or 24% and increased by
$1.5 million or 30% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004.
The 2005 Nine month increase was primarily from our late-year 2004 acquisitions of the
Anderson and Movieland Circuits and the addition of two new Anderson circuit cinemas in
December 2004. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense increased for the 2005 Quarter by $1.3 million or
368% and by $1.9 million or 67% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods
in 2004. The increase was primarily related to legal services for our continuing
anti-trust litigation with respect to the access of our Village East cinema to first run
commercial film products. |
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of business operations was $1.6 million from the disposition of our
Puerto Rico operations in June 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations increased for the 2005 Nine Months by $1.0 million
compared to the 2004 Nine months as a result of deteriorating operating results from our
Puerto Rico operations in the first two quarters of 2005 when compared to the three
quarters of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of the above, net income for the cinema segment decreased for the 2005
Quarter and 2005 Nine Months by $1.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively, when compared
to the same periods in 2004. |
Real Estate
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, our rental generating real estate
holdings consisted of:
|
|
|
our Belmont, Perth ETRC, our Auburn, Sydney ETRC and our Wellington , New Zealand ETRC; |
|
|
|
|
three single auditorium live theaters in Manhattan (Minetta Lane, Orpheum, and Union
Square) and a four auditorium live theater complex in Chicago (The Royal George) and, in
the case of the Union Square and the Royal George their accompanying ancillary retail and
commercial tenants; |
|
|
|
|
the ancillary retail and commercial tenants at some of our non-ETRC cinema locations; |
|
|
|
|
an office building located in Glendale, California (which we sold on May 17, 2005); and |
|
|
|
|
certain raw land, used in our historic activities. |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, our real estate segment generated the
following income statement activity:
|
|
|
Revenue increased for the 2005 Quarter by $136,000 or 4% and by $1.6 million or 17% for
the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004. Of the 2005 Nine Months
increase, approximately $827,000 was attributable to an increase in rent from our domestic
live theaters and |
26
|
|
|
$747,000 was from higher rental revenue and higher occupancy rates from
our New Zealand ETRCs and domestic properties. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expense for the real estate segment decreased for the 2005 Quarter by $112,000
or 7% and increased by $219,000 or 4% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same
periods in 2004. This 2005 Quarter decrease was primarily related to reduced operating
expenses in our New Zealand operations whereas the 2005 Nine Months change mostly relates
to an increase in variable costs associated with our live theater facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the real estate segment decreased by $354,000 or 28% for the
2005 Quarter and by $654,000 or 19% for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same
periods in 2004. The majority of this decrease was attributed to the sale of our Glendale
office building. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense decreased for the 2005 Quarter by $181,000 and by
$271,000 for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of business operations was $12.0 million from the disposition of our
Glendale office building. |
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations decreased for the 2005 Quarter by $67,000 and
increased by $134,000 for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in 2004.
The increase in the year-to-date income was primarily related to the fact that the Glendale
office building was held for sale from January 2005 to its sale date on May 17, 2005. As
such, we did not record depreciation expense for the building for the five months in
accordance with SFAS 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of the above, real estate net income increased for the 2005 Quarter by
$715,000 and by $14.5 million for the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the same periods in
2004. |
Corporate
General and administrative expense includes expenses that are not directly attributable to
other operating segments. The increase in general and administrative expense of $1.1 million in
the 2005 Nine Months when compared to the 2004 Nine Months was primarily due to additional bonus
accrual of $1.1 million related to our Chief Executive Officers new employment contract with the
Company.
Corporate other expense (income) is primarily comprised of:
|
|
|
interest expense/income; |
|
|
|
|
gain/loss on sale of assets; |
|
|
|
|
equity income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
gain recognized on foreign currency translation; and |
|
|
|
|
other miscellaneous income and loss items. |
Other expense for the 2005 Nine Months was $2.3 million compared to other income of $1.2
million for the same period in 2004. The change was primarily related to a decrease in income in
equity earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures of $343,000, a decrease in interest income of
$636,000, an increase in interest expense of $906,000, and a decrease in gains recognized for
currency fluctuation of $1.2 million. Other income for the 2005 Quarter decreased by $1.1 million
primarily due to a decrease of $150,000 in interest income and an increase interest expense of
$902,000.
27
Acquisitions
Rialto Joint Venture Purchase
Effective October 1, 2005, we purchased 100% of the stock of Rialto Entertainment for $4.5 million
(NZ$6.5 million). Rialto Entertainment is a 50% joint venture partner with Village
Roadshow/SkyCity Cinemas in the largest art cinema circuit in New Zealand. The joint venture owns
five cinemas with 22 screens in the New Zealand cities of Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington,
Dunedin and Hamilton.
Also as of October 1, 2005, we purchased for $694,000 (NZ$1.0 million) a 1/3
interest in Rialto Distribution. Rialto Distribution, an unincorporated joint venture, is engaged
in the business of distributing art film in New Zealand and Australia.
Melbourne Office Building
On September 29, 2005, we purchased an office building in Melbourne, Australia for $1.9
million (AUS$2.5 million) to serve as our Australia headquarters. We fully financed this property
by drawing on our Australian Corporate Credit Facility.
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Ground Lease
On September 19, 2005, we acquired a tenants ground lease interest that is currently between
(i) our fee ownership of the underlying land and (ii) our current possessory interest as the tenant
in the building and improvements constituting the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 in Manhattan. This tenants
ground lease interest was purchased from Sutton Hill Capital LLC (SHC) for a $9.0 million
promissory note, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 8.25% and maturing on December 31, 2010. As
SHC is a related party to our corporation, our Boards Audit and Conflicts Committee, comprised
entirely of outside independent directors, and subsequently our entire Board of Directors
unanimously approved the purchase of the property. The Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 is located on
3rd Avenue between 59th and 60th Streets.
The acquisition of the tenants ground lease interest finalizes the acquisition side of a tax
deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code designed to exchange our interest
in our only non-entertainment oriented fee property in the United States for the fee interest
underlying our leasehold estate in the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3. The acquisition of this tenants ground
lease interest and the Cinemas 1, 2, 3 Fee Interest described below have resulted in a book value
of approximately $22.9 million (which includes $1.3 million of option fees paid in 2000 as part of
the City Cinemas Master Lease Agreement, see Note 8 Goodwill and Intangible Assets) and a tax
basis of $9.1 million as compared to an appraised value of the property of $27.5 million, based on
an independent appraisal dated April 25, 2005.
For the time being, SHC will retain ownership of the building and improvements constituting
the Cinemas and in which we hold a tenancy interest. However, as a part of the transaction, we
have obtained the right to acquire these improvements for $100,000, in the event that we should
decide to redevelop the property. Accordingly, upon the acquisition of SHCs interest in the
ground lease we will have brought together under Reading the ownership interest of all of the
interests necessary for Reading to be, on a consolidated basis, the absolute fee owner of the
Cinemas property subject only to SHCs interest in the building which we have an option to
acquire for a further $100,000. Additionally, under the Master Operating Lease with SHC, the
exercise price of the option to purchase all assets under that lease was reduced by $9.0 million
resulting in a final option price of $6.0 million for the purchase of the Village East Cinema,
certain theater management and real estate rental contracts, and a reduction in rent from $1.2
million to $495,000 annually.
28
Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 Fee Interest
On June 1, 2005, we acquired for $12.6 million the fee interest and the landlords ground
lease interest underlying our Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property in Manhattan, as a part of a tax deferred
exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. The funds used for the acquisition came
primarily from the sale proceeds of our Glendale, California office building.
As a result of the acquisition of this fee interest, the landlords interest in the ground
lease and the tenants interest in the ground lease, our effective rental expense with respect to
the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 and the Village East cinema has decreased by approximately $1.0 million
annually as of September 30, 2005.
Dispositions
Wilmington and Northern Property
On September 26, 2005, we sold our Wilmington and Northern property for a cash total of
$515,000 resulting in a negligible loss on sale. This property was one of several remaining tracks
of railroad land, all of which are considered non-core assets under our current business plan. The
sale resulted in a negligible loss during the third quarter and the property produced a nominal
income per year.
Puerto Rico Cinema Assets
As of June 8, 2005, we closed the sale of all of our cinema assets located in Puerto Rico for
$2.3 million, resulting in a book gain of $1.6 million. This sale has likewise been booked as a
discontinued operation, and the resulting gain appears under gain on disposal of business
operations. In connection with the sale, we have entered into a covenant not to compete, and do
not currently intend to engage further in cinema operations in Puerto Rico.
The loss from discontinued operations of our Puerto Rico cinema operations was $1.8 million
for the 2005 Nine Months and $714,000 for the 2004 Nine Months. These operations produced net
losses of $338,000 and $1.7 million, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Included in the sold assets were our litigation claims against Plaza Las Americas. However,
we are continuing to pursue our antitrust action against the dominant exhibitor in Puerto Rico.
Glendale Office Building
On May 17, 2005, we closed the sale of our Glendale California office building for $21.0
million resulting in a book gain of $12.0 million. At the closing, we received net cash of
approximately $10.3 million and the buyer assumed our liability under the $10.1 million mortgage
encumbering the property. This sale has been booked as a discontinued operation, and the resultant
gain appears under gain on disposal of business operations.
This property was our only wholly owned property in the United States that was not used
directly in connection with our cinema and live theater operations. It was sold as a part of a
tax deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, with the intention of
reinvesting the profit and basis in the fee and ground lease interests underlying our Cinema 1, 2 &
3 leasehold property in Manhattan. Any future taxable income which may be related to the
transaction may be offset by approximately $22.8 million in future deductible temporary differences
arising from available U.S. operating loss carry forwards.
29
The income from discontinued operations of our Glendale Property was $387,000 for the 2005
Nine Months and $253,000 for the 2004 Nine Months.
Business Plan, Capital Resources and Liquidity
Business Plan
Our cinema exhibition business plan is to continue to identify, develop and acquire cinema
properties, focusing, where reasonably available, on those opportunities where we can acquire
either the fee interest underlying such operating assets, or long term leases, which provide
flexibility with respect to the usage of such leasehold estates. Our real estate business plan is
to continue to develop our existing land assets, focusing principally on uses that incorporate
entertainment elements such as cinemas, and to continue to be sensitive to opportunities to convert
our entertainment assets to higher and better uses such as the ongoing redevelopment of our
Sutton Cinema property into residential and retail condominium units.
We are currently concentrating our acquisitions and development activities primarily in
Australia and New Zealand, as we believe that there are currently better opportunities in these
markets than domestically and have now disposed of our cinema assets in Puerto Rico. We continue
to close under-performing cinema assets, or to sell or put to other purposes those cinema assets
which have value as real estate significantly in excess of their value as cinemas.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled
principal repayments of our secured debt and lease obligations at September 30, 2005 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
1,849 |
|
|
$ |
5,047 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
$ |
78,351 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
Long-term debt to related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
Lease obligations |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
11,513 |
|
|
|
10,964 |
|
|
|
10,842 |
|
|
|
75,172 |
|
Estimated interest on long-term debt |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
7,383 |
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
3,662 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,626 |
|
|
$ |
21,059 |
|
|
$ |
28,943 |
|
|
$ |
21,469 |
|
|
$ |
92,855 |
|
|
$ |
88,786 |
|
|
Estimated interest on long-term debt is based on the anticipated loan balances for future
periods calculated against current fixed and variable interest rates.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities in order to meet our
obligations and commitments drives our liquidity position. This is further affected by our ability
to obtain adequate, reasonable financing and/or to convert non-performing or non-strategic assets
into cash. We cannot separate liquidity from capital resources in achieving our long-term goals in
order to meet our debt servicing requirements.
Currently, our liquidity needs arise mainly from:
|
|
|
working capital requirements; |
|
|
|
|
debt servicing requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures. |
30
Operating Activities
Cash used in operations was $2.9 million in the 2005 Nine Months compared to $545,000 of cash
provided by operations in the 2004 Nine Months. The change in cash used in operations of $3.4
million is due primarily to:
|
|
|
an increase of interest payments of $2.1 million primarily related to our increased
borrowings in Australia for the Newmarket construction and our larger credit facility New
Zealand and |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.8 million in cash provided by discontinued operations. |
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the first nine months of 2005 increased by $16.9 million
compared to the same period in 2004. The 24.4 million cash used for the 2005 Nine Months was
primarily related to:
|
|
|
$12.6 million in net proceeds from the sales of our Glendale office building and Puerto
Rico operations; |
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million cash provided by a decrease in restricted cash; and |
|
|
|
|
$515,000 in cash proceeds from the sale of our Wilmington and Northern property; offset by |
|
|
|
|
$14.4 million paid for acquisitions including $11.8 million for the acquisition of the
fee interest and tenants ground lease interest of the Cinemas 1, 2 & 3 property in New
York City, $700,000 deposit paid to secure a contract to acquire a company whose sole
assets is a 50% interest in an unincorporated joint venture that owns 20 screens, and $1.9
million (AUS$2.5 million) paid for our new Melbourne Office Building; |
|
|
|
|
$23.2 million in purchases of property and equipment related to approximately $21.4
million for the on-going construction work on our Newmarket development in Brisbane,
Australia and the fit-out of our 8 screen Adelaide, Australia cinema which opened on
October 20, 2005 and $1.8 million in purchases of equipment primarily related to our
renovation of our New Zealand Movieland sites; |
|
|
|
|
$905,000 cash paid as additional capital contributions with respect to our investment in
the 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC. |
The $7.6 million cash used for the 2004 Nine Months was primarily related to:
|
|
|
$14.3 million of acquisition costs related to the Anderson Circuit acquisition, of $9.5
million (AUS$13.3 million) and the Movieland Circuit acquisition of $4.8 million (NZ$7.2
million); |
|
|
|
|
$617,000 in purchases of property and equipment in our US; |
|
|
|
|
$1.1 million (AUS$1.4 million) related to the purchase of additional land adjacent to
our Newmarket Shopping Centre development; |
|
|
|
|
$2.3 million of restricted cash related to the purchase of the Anderson circuit; |
|
|
|
|
$2.4 million for the acquisition of our membership interest in 205-209 E.
57th Street Associates LLC (the developer of Place 57); offset by |
|
|
|
|
$13.0 million receivable payment on the Sutton Promissory Note. |
31
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $24.9 million for the first nine months of 2005
compared to cash used in financing activities of $6.9 million during the same period in 2004. This
increase is attributable to our increase in borrowings of approximately $25.7 million primarily
used to finance the on-going construction work on our Newmarket development in Brisbane, Australia.
During the period we were able to extend our Australian Corporate Credit Facility from $42.0
million (AUS$55.0 million) to $51.5 million (AUS$67.4 million) including a ($7.6 million AUS$10.0
million) working capital facility. This additional liquidity will allow us to continue to expand
our operations in Australia.
Summary
Our cash position at September 30, 2005 was $10.2 million compared to $12.3 million at
December 31, 2004. The majority of the $2.1 million change related to the following transactions:
|
|
|
$10.3 million increase related to the sale of our Glendale Building; |
|
|
|
|
$2.3 million increase related to the sale of our Puerto Rico cinema operation; |
|
|
|
|
$515,000 increase in cash proceeds from the sale of our Wilmington and Northern property; |
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million cash provided by a decrease in restricted cash; and |
|
|
|
|
$25.7 million of new borrowings; offset by |
|
|
|
|
$21.4 million of capital expenditures related to the on-going construction work on our
Newmarket development and the fit-out of our 8 screen Adelaide, Australia cinema which
opened on October 20, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
$1.8 million related to the purchase of property and equipment in the U.S. and New Zealand; |
|
|
|
|
$2.1 million of additional interest payments; |
|
|
|
|
$905,000 additional capital contributions with respect to maintaining our 25% interest
in 205-209 East 57th Street Associates, LLC; and |
|
|
|
|
$11.8 million paid for the fee interest in the Cinemas 1, 2, 3 property in New York
City. |
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission defines critical accounting policies as those that are,
in managements view, most important to the portrayal of the companys financial condition and
results of operations and the most demanding in their calls on judgment. Although accounting for
our core business of cinema and live theater exhibition with a real estate focus is relatively
straightforward, we believe our most critical accounting policies relate to:
|
|
|
impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets; |
|
|
|
|
tax valuation allowance and obligations; and |
|
|
|
|
legal and environmental obligations. |
These critical accounting policies are fully discussed in our 2004 Annual Report and you are
advised to refer to that discussion.
32
Financial Risk Management
Our internally developed risk management procedure, seeks to minimize the potentially negative
effects of changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates on the results of operations. Our
primary exposure to fluctuations in the financial markets is currently due to changes in foreign
exchange rates between U.S and Australia and New Zealand, and interest rates.
After the Consolidation on December 31, 2001, we began recognizing unrealized foreign currency
translation gains and losses. As our operational focus continues to shift to Australia and New
Zealand, unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses could materially affect our
financial position. We currently manage our currency exposure by creating natural hedges in
Australia and New Zealand. This involves local country sourcing of goods and services as well as
borrowing in local currencies.
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises out of our long-term debt obligations. Consistent
with our internally developed guidelines, we seek to reduce the negative effects of changes in
interest rates by changing the character of the interest rate on our long-term debt, converting a
variable rate into a fixed rate. Our internal procedures allow us to enter into derivative
contracts on certain borrowing transactions to achieve this goal. As detailed in our 2004 Annual
Report, our Australian credit facilities provide for floating interest rates but require that not
less than a certain percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations using the
derivative contracts.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
we marked our Australian interest swap instruments to market on the consolidated balance sheet
resulting in an $194,000 (AUS$281,000) decrease and $180,000 (AUS$254,000) decrease to interest
expense during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. We have
recorded the fair market value of our interest rate swaps of $846,000 (AUS$1.1 million) as an other
long-term liability. The swap with a notional amount of $12,477,000 does not have a Receive
Variable Rate because the instrument will not be effective until March 31, 2006. In accordance
with SFAS No. 133, we have not designated any of our current interest rate swap positions as
financial reporting hedges.
Inflation
We continually monitor inflation and the effects of changing prices. Inflation increases the
cost of goods and services used. Competitive conditions in many of our markets restrict our
ability to fully recover the higher costs of acquired goods and services through price increases.
We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation by implementing continuous process improvement
solutions to enhance productivity and efficiency and, as a result, lower costs and operating
expenses. In our opinion, the effects of inflation have been managed appropriately and as a
result, have not had a material impact on our operations and the resulting financial position or
liquidity.
Litigation
We are currently, and are from time to time, involved with claims and lawsuits arising in the
ordinary course of our business. Some examples of the types of claims are:
|
|
|
contractual obligations; |
|
|
|
|
insurance claims; |
|
|
|
|
IRS claims; |
|
|
|
|
employment matters; and |
33
Where we are the plaintiffs, we expense all legal fees on an on-going basis and make no
provision for any potential settlement amounts until received. In Australia, the prevailing party
is entitled to recover its attorneys fees, which typically works out to be approximately 60% of the
amounts actually spent where first class legal counsel is engaged at customary rates. Where we are
a plaintiff, we have likewise made no provision for the liability for the defendants attorneys
fees in the event we were determined not to be the prevailing party.
Where we are the defendants, we accrue for probable damages, which may not be covered by
insurance, as they become known and can be reasonably estimated. In our opinion, any claims and
litigation in which we are currently involved are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity. However, we do not
give any assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such claims and litigation. The resolution of
such claims and litigation could be material to our operating results for any particular period,
depending on the level of income for such period. An update of our current litigation since our
Companys 2004 Annual Report is described below.
Whitehorse Litigation
On October 30, 2000, we commenced litigation in the Supreme Court of Victoria at Melbourne,
Commercial and Equity Division, against our joint venture partner and the controlling stockholders
of our joint venture partner in the Whitehorse Shopping Center. That action is entitled Reading
Entertainment Australia PTY, LTD vs. Burstone Victoria PTY, LTD and May Way Khor and David
Frederick Burr, and was brought to collect on a promissory note (the K/B Promissory Note)
evidencing a loan that we made to Ms. Khor and Mr. Burr and that was guaranteed by Burstone
Victoria PTY, LTD (Burstone and collectively with Ms. Khor and Mr. Burr, the Burstone Parties).
This loan balance has been previously written off and is no longer
recorded on our books. The Burstone Parties asserted in defense certain set-offs and counterclaims, alleging, in essence,
that we had breached our alleged obligations to proceed with the development of the Whitehorse
Shopping Center, causing the Burstone Parties substantial damages. Following trial, the trial
court not only affirmed the liability of the Burstone Parties on the K/B Promissory Note but also
determined that we had breached certain obligations owed to WPG (the joint venture in which we own
a 50% interest and in which Burstone owns the remaining 50% interest). The trial court did not,
however, find us in breach of any direct obligations to any one or more of the Burstone Parties.
The trial court has entered judgment against us and in favor of WPG in the amount of $3.4
million (AUS$4.5 million). The trial court has also entered judgment against the Burstone Parties
and in our favor in the amount of $3.2 million (AUS$4.2 million). Further, the trial court has
found us responsible to reimburse the Burstone Parties for 65% of their out-of-pocket legal fees,
an amount not yet determined but estimated at approximately $764,000 (AUS$1.0 million) . In
addition, we have settled various ancillary claims against us for an additional $306,000
(AUS$400,000), which has now been paid to WPG.
As discussed in greater detail below, we have given timely notice of our intention to appeal
the judgment entered against us by the trial court and intend to vigorously prosecute that appeal.
The Burstone Parties have likewise appealed, arguing that the damages assessed in favor of WPG and
against us should be higher.
A provisional liquidator has been appointed for WPG, and that company is now in the process of
being wound up. As a consequence of our 50% interest in WPG, in the event that we are not
successful in our appeal, we currently anticipate that we will ultimately receive liquidating
distributions from WPG in an amount equal to approximately $1.8 million (AUS$2.3 million). During
the third quarter, the Burstone Parties paid us $229,000 (AUS$300,000) against our judgment against
them, and we have now entered into an agreement with the Burstone Parties, pursuant to which they
have agreed to pay the balance of our judgment against them, together with ongoing interest, over
time and have provided various undertakings and a guaranty to secure that
34
obligation. Accordingly, we believe that our judgment against the Burstone Parties is adequately secured and,
even if we do not prevail on appeal, we will still net in the range of $1.2 million (AUS$1.6
million) from the litigation, less such attorneys fees as may be assessed against us when the
final accounting for such fees is made and our own costs of collection.
We are advised by senior Queens Counsel after conducting an independent review of the
evidence submitted at trial and the trial courts opinion that, in his opinion, the trial court
erred in a number of critical aspects, and that we should have no liability to WPG or any of the
Burstone Parties. Accordingly, we have appealed that part of the trial courts determination.
Forward-Looking Statements
Our statements in this interim quarterly report contain a variety of forward-looking
statements as defined by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements
reflect only our expectations regarding future events and operating performance and necessarily
speak only as of the date the information was prepared. No guarantees can be given that our
expectation will in fact be realized, in whole or in part. You can recognize these statements by
our use of words such as, by way of example, may, will, expect, believe, and anticipate
or other similar terminology.
These forward-looking statements reflect our expectation after having considered a variety of
risks and uncertainties. However, they are necessarily the product of internal discussion and do
not necessarily completely reflect the views of individual members of our Board of Directors or of
our management team. Individual Board members and individual members of our management team may
have different view as to the risks and uncertainties involved, and may have different views as to
future events or our operating performance.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
or underlying our forward-looking statements are the following:
|
|
|
With respect to our cinema operations: |
|
o |
|
The number and attractiveness to movie goers of the films released in future periods; |
|
|
o |
|
The amount of money spent by film distributors to promote their motion pictures; |
|
|
o |
|
The licensing fees and terms required by film distributors from motion
picture exhibitors in order to exhibit their films; |
|
|
o |
|
The comparative attractiveness of motion pictures as a source of
entertainment and willingness and/or ability of consumers (i) to spend their
dollars on entertainment and (ii) to spend their entertainment dollars on movies in
an outside the home environment; and |
|
|
o |
|
The extent to which we encounter competition from other cinema
exhibitors, from other sources of outside of the home entertainment, and from
inside the home entertainment options, such as home theaters and competitive film
product distribution technology such as, by way of example, cable, satellite
broadcast, DVD and VHS rentals and sales, and so called movies on demand; |
|
|
|
With respect to our real estate development and operation activities: |
|
o |
|
The rental rates and capitalization rates applicable to the markets in
which we operate and the quality of properties that we own; |
|
|
o |
|
The extent to which we can obtain on a timely basis the various land
use approvals and entitlements needed to develop our properties; |
35
|
o |
|
The availability and cost of labor and materials; |
|
|
o |
|
Competition for development sites and tenants; and |
|
|
o |
|
The extent to which our cinemas can continue to serve as an anchor
tenant which will, in turn, be influenced by the same factors as will influence
generally the results of our cinema operations; and |
|
|
|
With respect to our operations generally as an international company involved in both
the development and operation of cinemas and the development and operation of real estate;
and previously engaged for many years in the railroad business in the United States: |
|
o |
|
Our ongoing access to borrowed funds and capital and the interest that
must be paid on that debt and the returns that must be paid on such capital; |
|
|
o |
|
The relative values of the currency used in the countries in which we
operate; |
|
|
o |
|
Changes in government regulation, including by way of example, the
costs resulting from the implementation of the requirements of Sarbanes Oxley; |
|
|
o |
|
Our labor relations and costs of labor (including future government
requirements with respect to pension liabilities, disability insurance and health
coverage, and vacations and leave); |
|
|
o |
|
Our exposure from time to time to legal claims and to uninsurable risks
such as those related to our historic railroad operations, including potential
environmental claims and health related claims relating to alleged exposure to
asbestos or other substances now or in the future recognized as being possible
causes of cancer or other health related problems; |
|
|
o |
|
Changes in future effective tax rates and the results of currently
ongoing and future potential audits by taxing authorities having jurisdiction over
our various companies; and |
|
|
o |
|
Changes in applicable accounting policies and practices. |
The above list is not necessarily exhaustive, as business is by definition unpredictable and
risky, and subject to influence by numerous factors outside of our control such as changes in
government regulation or policy, competition, interest rates, supply, technological innovation,
changes in consumer taste and fancy, weather, and the extent to which consumers in our markets have
the economic wherewithal to spend money on beyond-the-home entertainment.
Given the variety and unpredictability of the factors that will ultimately influence our
businesses and our results of operation, it naturally follows that no guarantees can be given that
any of our forward-looking statements will ultimately prove to be correct. Actual results will
undoubtedly vary and there is no guarantee as to how our securities will perform either when
considered in isolation or when compared to other securities or investment opportunities.
Finally, please understand that we undertake no obligation to publicly update or to revise any
of our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as may be required under applicable law. Accordingly, you should always note
the date to which our forward-looking statements speak.
Additionally, certain of the presentations included in this interim quarterly report may
contain pro forma information or non-GAAP financial measures. In such case, a reconciliation
of this information to our GAAP financial statements will be made available in connection with such
statements.
36
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that registrants include information about
potential effects of changes in currency exchange and interest rates in their filings. Several
alternatives, all with some limitations, have been offered. The following discussion is based on a
sensitivity analysis, which models the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates and
interest rates. This analysis is constrained by several factors, including the following:
|
|
|
It is based on a single point in time. |
|
|
|
|
It does not include the effects of other complex market reactions that would arise from
the changes modeled. |
|
|
Although the results of such an analysis may be useful as a benchmark, they should not be
viewed as forecasts. |
At September 30, 2005, approximately 51% and 22% of our assets were invested in assets
denominated in Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New
Zealand), respectively, including approximately $1.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. At
December 31, 2004, approximately 48% and 25% of our assets were invested in assets denominated in
Australian dollars (Reading Australia) and New Zealand dollars (Reading New Zealand) including
approximately $9.3 million in cash and cash equivalents.
Our policy in Australia and New Zealand is to match revenues and expenses, whenever possible,
in local currencies. As a result, a majority of our expenses in Australia and New Zealand have
been procured in local currencies. Due to the developing nature of our operations in Australia and
New Zealand, our revenue is not yet significantly greater than our operating expense. The
resulting natural operating hedge has led to a somewhat negligible foreign currency effect on our
earnings.
Our policy is to borrow in local currencies to finance the development and construction of our
ETRCs in Australia and New Zealand whenever possible. As a result, the borrowings in local
currencies have provided somewhat of a natural hedge against the foreign currency exchange
exposure. Even so, approximately 53% and 32% of our Australian and New Zealand assets,
respectively, remain subject to such exposure unless we elect to hedge our foreign currency
exchange between the US and Australian and New Zealand dollars. At the present time, we have no
plan to hedge such exposure.
We recognize unrealized foreign currency translation gains or losses which could materially
affect our financial position. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we have recorded a
cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gain of approximately $31.3 million and $32.4
million, respectively. A change of 10% in foreign currency rates would result in an approximately
$73,000 increase or decrease in our 2005 Nine Months net income.
Historically, we maintained most of our cash and cash equivalent balances in short-term money
market instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Some of our money market
investments may decline in value if interest rates increase. Due to the short-term nature of such
investments, a change of 1% in short-term interest rates would not have a material effect on our
financial condition.
37
Item 3A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Interest Risk
The majority of our U.S. bank loans have fixed interest rates; however, one of our domestic
loans has a variable interest rate and a change of approximately 1% in short-term interest rates
would have resulted in an approximately $20,000 increase or decrease in our 2005 Nine Months
interest expense.
While we have typically used fixed rate financing (secured by first mortgages) in the U.S.,
fixed rate financing is typically not available to corporate borrowers in Australia and New
Zealand. The majority of our Australian and New Zealand bank loans have variable rates. The
Australian facilities provide for floating interest rates, but require that not less than a certain
percentage of the loans be swapped into fixed rate obligations (see Financial Risk Management
above). If we consider the interest rate swaps, a 1% increase in short-term interest rates would
have resulted in approximately $617,000 increase in our 2005 Nine Months Australian and New Zealand
interest expense while a 1% decrease in short-term interest rates would have resulted in
approximately $609,000 decrease the 2005 Nine Months of Australian and New Zealand interest
expense.
38
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report.
39
PART II Other Information
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
For a description of legal proceedings, please refer to Item 3 entitled Legal Proceedings
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 2 Change in Securities
Not applicable.
Item 3 Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6 Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
READING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 7, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James J. Cotter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Cotter |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 7, 2005
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrzej Matyczynski |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
41
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James J. Cotter, certify that:
|
1) |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International Inc.; |
|
|
2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
|
3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|
|
4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
general accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as
of the Evaluation Date; |
|
5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
|
6) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James J. Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Cotter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2005 |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Andrzej Matyczynski, certify that:
|
1) |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reading International Inc.; |
|
|
2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
|
3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|
|
4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
general accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
a) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as
of the Evaluation Date; |
|
5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
|
6) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrzej Matyczynski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2005 |
|
|
exv32
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Reading
International, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:
|
|
|
The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and |
|
|
|
|
The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Dated: November 7, 2005
|
|
|
/s/ James J. Cotter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: James J. Cotter |
|
|
Title Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Andrzej Matyczynski |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Andrzej Matyczynski |
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|